Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Haddad, Mark; Menchetti, Marco; McKeown, Eamonn; Tylee, André; Mann, Anthony (2015)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: BMC Psychiatry
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2738, RC, Research Article, Psychiatry and Mental health
Background Depression is a common mental disorder associated with substantial disability. It is inadequately recognised and managed, and clinicians’ attitudes to this condition and its treatment may play a part in this. Most research in this area has used the Depression Attitude Questionnaire (DAQ), but analyses have shown this measure to exhibit problems in psychometric properties and suitability for the health professionals and settings where depression recognition may occur. Methods We revised the DAQ using a pooled review of findings from studies using this measure, together with a Delphi study which sought the opinions of a panel of relevant experts based in the UK, USA, Australia, and European countries (n = 24) using 3 rounds of questioning to consider attitude dimensions, content, and item wording. After item generation, revision and consensus (agreement >70%) using the Delphi panel, the revised DAQ (R-DAQ) was tested with 1193 health care providers to determine its psychometric properties. Finally the test-retest reliability of the R-DAQ was examined with 38 participants. Results The 22-item R-DAQ scale showed good internal consistency: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.84; and satisfactory test-retest reliability: intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.62 (95% C.I. 0.37 to 0.78). Exploratory factor analysis favoured a three-factor structure (professional confidence, therapeutic optimism/pessimism, and a generalist perspective), which accounted for 45.3% of the variance. Conclusions The R-DAQ provides a revised tool for examining clinicians’ views and understanding of depression. It addresses important weaknesses in the original measure whilst retaining items and dimensions that appeared valid. This revised scale is likely to be useful in examining attitudes across the health professional workforce and beyond the confines of the UK, and may be valuable for the purpose of evaluating training that aims to address clinicians’ attitudes to depression. It incorporates key dimensions of attitudes with a modest number of items making it applicable to use in busy clinical settings. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-014-0381-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. WHO. Depression: a global public health concern. Geneva: WHO; 2012. http://www.who.int/mental_health/management/depression/who_paper_ depression_wfmh_2012.pdf.
    • 2. Waraich P, Goldner EM, Somers JM, Hsu L. Prevalence and incidence studies of mood disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry. 2004;49(0706-7437; 0706-7437; 2):124-38.
    • 3. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet. 2009;373(1474-547; 0140-6736; 9672):1372-81.
    • 4. World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
    • 5. Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet. 2007;370(1474-547; 9590):851-8.
    • 6. Menchetti M, Murri MB, Bertakis K, Bortolotti B, Berardi D. Recognition and treatment of depression in primary care: effect of patients' presentation and frequency of consultation. J Psychosom Res. 2009;66 (1879-1360; 4):335-41.
    • 7. Mitchell AJ, Vaze A, Rao S. Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;374(1474-547; 0140-6736; 9690):609-19.
    • 8. Schomerus G, Schwahn C, Holzinger A, Corrigan PW, Grabe HJ, Carta MG, et al. Evolution of public attitudes about mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2012;125(6):440-52.
    • 9. Dumesnil H, Cortaredona S, Verdoux H, Sebbah R, Paraponaris A, Verger P. General practitioners' choices and their determinants when starting treatment for major depression: a cross sectional, randomized case-vignette survey. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52429.
    • 10. Ross S, Moffat K, McConnachie A, Gordon J, Wilson P. Sex and attitude: a randomized vignette study of the management of depression by general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49(438):17-21.
    • 11. Kendrick T, King F, Albertella L, Smith PW. GP treatment decisions for patients with depression: an observational study. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55 (513):280-6.
    • 12. Dowrick C, Gask L, Perry R, Dixon C, Usherwood T. Do general practitioners' attitudes towards depression predict their clinical behaviour? Psychol Med. 2000;30(2):413-9.
    • 13. Botega N, Mann A, Blizard R, Wilkinson G. General practitioners and depression - first use of the depression attitude questionnaire. Int J Meth Psych Res. 1992;2:169-80.
    • 14. Kerr M, Blizard R, Mann A. General practitioners and psychiatrists: comparison of attitudes to depression using the depression attitude questionnaire. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45(391):89-92.
    • 15. Haddad M, Walters P, Tylee A. District nursing staff and depression: a psychometric evaluation of Depression Attitude Questionnaire findings. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(3):447-56.
    • 16. Haddad M, Butler GS, Tylee A. School nurses' involvement, attitudes and training needs for mental health work: A UK-wide cross-sectional study. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(11):2471-80.
    • 17. Scheerder G, De Coster I, Van Audenhove C. Community pharmacists' attitude toward depression: a pilot study. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2009;5(3):242-52.
    • 18. Waller R, Hillam JC. Assessment of depression in older medical inpatients: practice, attitudes and the effect of teaching. Aging Ment Health. 2000;4(3):275-7.
    • 19. Haddad M, Menchetti M, Walters P, Norton J, Tylee A, Mann A. Clinicians' attitudes to depression in Europe: a pooled analysis of depression attitude questionnaire findings. Fam Pract. 2012;29(2):121-30.
    • 20. Botega NJ, Silveira GM. General practitioners attitudes towards depression: a study in primary care setting in Brazil. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1996;42(3):230-7.
    • 21. Richards JC, Ryan P, McCabe MP, Groom G, Hickie IB. Barriers to the effective management of depression in general practice. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004;38(10):795-803.
    • 22. James BO, Jenkins R, Lawani AO, Omoaregba JO. Depression in primary care: the knowledge, attitudes and practice of general practitioners in Benin City, Nigeria. S Afr Fam Pract. 2012;54(1):55-60.
    • 23. Ohtsuki T, Kodaka M, Sakai R, Ishikura F, Watanabe Y, Mann A, et al. Attitudes toward depression among Japanese non-psychiatric medical doctors: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:441-0500-5-441.
    • 24. Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(10):e1-8.
    • 25. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97.
    • 26. MORI Poll: Defeat Depression Campaign. 1992, in, Priest RG, Vize C, Roberts A, Roberts M, Tylee A. Lay people's attitudes to treatment of depression: results of opinion poll for Defeat Depression Campaign just before its launch. BMJ. 1996;313(7061):858-9.
    • 27. Scheerder G, Audenhove CV, Arensman E, Bernik B, Giupponi G, Horel AC, et al. Community and health professionals' attitude toward depression: a pilot study in nine EADD countries. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011;57(4):387-401.
    • 28. Mehta N, Kassam A, Leese M, Butler G, Thornicroft G. Public attitudes towards people with mental illness in England and Scotland, 1994-2003. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194(3):278-84.
    • 29. Taylor SM, Dear MJ. Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophr Bull. 1981;7(2):225-40.
    • 30. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-5.
    • 31. Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7):1-9. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7.
    • 32. Gaskin CJ, Happell B. On exploratory factor analysis: a review of recent evidence, an assessment of current practice, and recommendations for future use. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(3):511-21.
    • 33. Lusk C, Delclos GL, Burau K, Drawhorn DD, Aday LA. Mail versus internet surveys: determinants of method of response preferences among health professionals. Eval Health Prof. 2007;30(2):186-201.
    • 34. Inc SPSS. SPSS advanced models 15.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc; 2006.
    • 35. Kaiser HF. Computing measures of simplicity of fit for loadings in factor-analytically derived scales. Psychometrika. 1974;39:31-6.
    • 36. Childs D. The essentials of factor analysis. Holt: Rinehart and Winston; 1970.
    • 37. Bartlett MS. A note on multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. J R Stat Soc. 1954;16(Series B):296-8.
    • 38. Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res. 1966;1:245-76.
    • 39. Tabachnick BG. Using multivariate statistics, 6th international ed. Boston, Mass. London: Pearson; 2013.
    • 40. Streiner DL. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
    • 41. Stanley RM, Ridley K, Olds TS, Dollman J. Development and psychometric properties of the Y-PASS questionnaire to assess correlates of lunchtime and after-school physical activity in children. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:412-2458-14-412.
    • 42. Mcgraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:30-46.
    • 43. McHorney CA, Ware Jr JE, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item ShortForm Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32(1):40-66.
    • 44. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 1948;32:221-33.
    • 45. Shih T, Fan X. Comparing response rates from web and mail surveys: a meta-analysis. Field Methods. 2008;20(3):249-71.
    • 46. Haddad M, Walters P, Tylee A. Mood disorders in primary care. Psychiatr. 2009;8(2):71-5.
    • 47. TNS-BRMB: Attitudes to mental illness 2012 Research report, prepared for the Time to Change 2013. www.mind.org.uk/..118308-attitudes-to-mentalillness-2012-report-v6.docx. 2013.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article