LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Springer
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF, H1
Objectives: Current ‘geographical offender profiling’ methods that predict an offender’s base location from information about where he commits his crimes have been limited by employing aggregate distributions across a number of offenders, ignoring the possibility of axially distorted distributions and working with limited probability models. The efficacy of five ideographic models (derived only from individual crime series) was therefore tested.\ud \ud Methods: A dataset of 63 burglary series from the UK was analysed using five different ideographic models to make predictions of the likely location of an offenders home/base: (1) a Gaussian-based density analysis (kernel density estimation); (2) a regression-based analysis; (3) an application of the ‘Circle Hypothesis’; (4) a mixed Gaussian method; and (5) a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) analysis. These tests were carried out by incorporating the models into a new version of the widely utilised Dragnet geographical profiling system DragNetP. The efficacy of the models was determined using both distance and area measures.\ud \ud Results: Results were compared between the different algorithms and with previously reported findings employing nomothetic algorithms, Bayesian approaches and human judges. Overall the ideographic models performed better than alternate strategies and human judges. Each model was optimal for some series, no one model producing the best results for all series.\ud \ud Conclusions: Although restricted to one limited sample the current study does show that these offenders vary considerably in the spatial distribution of offence location choice and mathematical models therefore need to take this into account. Such models will improve geographically based investigative decision support systems.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article