Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Polymers have been used as biomaterials for nearly a century and have recently become the material of choice for use in tissue engineering. However, the classes of biodegradable and biocompatible polymers available for use in biomedical devices and as tissue engineering scaffolds are limited. This lack of available polymers with suitable properties could inhibit the development of biomedical devices with improved biocompatibility and hinder the growth of the fledgling tissue engineering field. Researchers in the polymer and biomaterials fields have tried to remedy this problem by applying combinatorial and high throughput methods developed in drug discovery to the search for new polymers. A recent advance has been the development of combinatorial polymer libraries printed as microarrays. This format allows the polymers to be readily screened for their cell adhesion and differentiation properties, allowing ‘hit’ materials with ideal properties to be identified. However, without knowledge of the surface properties of these novel polymers it is impossible to rationalise their biological properties. The surface characterisation of such microarrays presents numerous practical problems included small sample size, sample number and even analysis of such large amounts of data. It is the aim of this thesis to develop methods for the characterisation of the surface chemistry, wettability and protein adsorption properties of polymers in situ in microarray format and within realistic timeframes. The thesis will explore multivariate statistics in the form of PCA and PLS as methods of analysing the large amount of data acquired. The first part of this thesis describes the surface chemical analysis of a polymer microarray using ToF-SIMS and XPS. A comparison of the polymers’ surface to bulk chemistries by XPS indicated that 64 % of the polymers had a surface chemistry which differed from the bulk. This reinforces the need for characterisation of the polymers’ surface chemistries, as it is obvious that this can not be inferred from their bulk chemistries. ToF-SIMS imaging was shown to be an ideal method of studying the distribution of specific ion species across the array and to confirm that the microarray was printed in the intended layout. Principal component analysis is shown to be an ideal technique to analyse both ToF-SIMS and XPS spectral data from the arrays, allowing similarities and differences in the surface chemistry of the polymers to be easily visualised. To estimate the surface energies of the arrayed polymers it is necessary to use picolitre volume droplets to make contact angle measurements. In Chapter 4 it is shown that contact angle measurements taken from picolitre volume water droplets are equivalent to those measured from more conventional microlitre droplets. In Chapter 5 picolitre contact angle measurements are used to estimate the polar and dispersive surface energies of a polymer microarray, which has been specifically designed to exhibit a maximum range of surface energy values. The analysis shows that there is indeed great variation in the WCA and polar surface energies of the polymers, demonstrating the power of intelligently designed combinatorial libraries. To understand the chemical basis of this large range of surface energies the results are compared to surface chemical data from ToF-SIMS and XPS. Surface atomic and functional data from XPS is unable to provide any definitive explanations for the range of surface energies observed. However, information about the molecular structure of the surface from ToF-SIMS gives an insight into what surface functionalities are responsible for high and low surface energies. In Chapter 6 PLS regression is investigated further as a method for investigating surface structure-property relationships in large polymer libraries. Specifically two issues are investigated: the influence of sample number on the results obtained and the ability of PLS to make quantitative predictions. The ToF-SIMS and surface energy dataset discussed in Chapter 5 is used for this task. It is demonstrated that the results obtained from PLS models of large polymer libraries are equivalent to those obtained from much smaller datasets, in terms of the ions identified in the regression vector. Using various test sets of polymers it is shown that there is a limit to the predictive ability of PLS: specifically, as the difference between the training and test sets increases, the quality of the predictions decreases. Potential problems with data pre-processing and re-scaling are also identified. In the final experimental chapter two methods are described for investigating protein adhesion and adsorption to micro-arrayed polymers using AFM and fluorescently labelled proteins. Both methods indicate a wide range of protein adsorption properties within the group of polymers analysed. A good correlation between the two sets of data was observed which appears to validate both methods. In summary the work described in this thesis has demonstrated the feasibility of the characterisation of the surface chemistry, energetics and protein adsorption properties of a micro-arrayed polymer library within realistic time-frames. PCA and PLS have been shown to be useful tools for analysing the data obtained. It is hoped that the methods described in this thesis will allow the biological data from polymer microarrays to be rationalised using the surface properties of the polymers, allowing the design of new biomaterials.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 2. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen JF, Lemons JE. Biomaterials Science, an Introduction to Materials in Medicine. San Diego: Academic, 1996.
    • 3. Blaine G. The Uses of Plastics in Surgery. Lancet 1946;251(OCT12):525- 528.
    • 4. Ingraham FD, Alexander E, Matson DD. Synthetic Plastic Materials in Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine 1947;236(10):362-368.
    • 5. Langer R, Tirrell DA. Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature 2004 Apr;428(6982):487-492.
    • 6. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue Engineering. Science 1993 May;260(5110):920-926.
    • 7. Stevens MM, George JH. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 2005 Nov;310(5751):1135-1138.
    • 8. Young RJ, Lovell PA. Introduction to Polymers. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
    • 9. Walton D, Lorimer P. Polymers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
    • 10. Dumitriu S. Polymeric Biomaterials. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2001.
    • 11. Kohn J, Welsh WJ, Knight D. A new approach to the rationale discovery of polymeric biomaterials. Biomaterials 2007 Oct;28(29):4171-4177.
    • 12. Eisenberger P. Biomaterials and medical implant science. Bethesda MD: NIH; 1995 October 16-17.
    • 13. Webster DC. Combinatorial and high-throughput methods in macromolecular materials research and development. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics 2008 Feb;209(3):237-246.
    • 14. Meredith JC. A current perspective on high-throughput polymer science. Journal of Materials Science 2003 Nov;38(22):4427-4437.
    • 15. Brocchini S, James K, Tangpasuthadol V, Kohn J. A combinatorial approach for polymer design. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1997 May;119(19):4553-4554.
    • 16. Brocchini S, James K, Tangpasuthadol V, Kohn J. Structure-property correlations in a combinatorial library of degradable biomaterials. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1998 Oct;42(1):66-75.
    • 17. Meredith JC, Karim A, Amis EJ. High-throughput measurement of polymer blend phase behavior. Macromolecules 2000 Aug;33(16):5760-5762.
    • 18. Washburn NR, Yamada KM, Simon CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ. Highthroughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials 2004 Mar-Apr;25(7- 8):1215-1224.
    • 19. Zelzer M, Majani R, Bradley JW, Rose FRAJ, Davies MC, Alexander MR. Investigation of cell-surface interactions using chemical gradients formed from plasma polymers. Biomaterials 2008;29:172-184.
    • 20. Kohn J. Implants: the biodegradable future. Medical Device Development 2006:35-36.
    • 21. Tourniaire G, Collins J, Campbell S, Mizomoto H, Ogawa S, Thaburet JF, et al. Polymer microarrays for cellular adhesion. Chemical Communications 2006 May(20):2118-2120.
    • 22. Urquhart AJ, Anderson, D.G., Taylor, M., Alexander, M.R., Langer, R., Davies, M.C. High Through-put Surface Characterisation of a Combinatorial Material Library. Advanced Materials (In press) 2007.
    • 23. Lynn DM, Anderson DG, Putnam D, Langer R. Accelerated discovery of synthetic transfection vectors: Parallel synthesis and screening of degradable polymer library. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2001 Aug;123(33):8155-8156.
    • 24. Anderson DG, Lynn DM, Langer R. Semi-automated synthesis and screening of a large library of degradable cationic polymers for gene delivery. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition 2003;42(27):3153-3158.
    • 25. Morgenthaler S, Zink C, Spencer ND. Surface-chemical and morphological gradients. Soft Matter 2008;4:419-434.
    • 26. Meredith JC, Sormana JL, Keselowsky BG, Garcia AJ, Tona A, Karim A, et al. Combinatorial characterization of cell interactions with polymer surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 2003 Sep;66A(3):483-490.
    • 27. Simon CG, Eidelman N, Kennedy SB, Sehgal A, Khatri CA, Washburn NR. Combinatorial screening of cell proliferation on poly(D,L-lactic acid)/poly(D,L-lactic acid) blends. Biomaterials 2005 Dec;26(34):6906-6915.
    • 28. Hubbell JA. Biomaterials science and high-throughput screening. Nature Biotechnology 2004 Jul;22(7):828-829.
    • 29. Diaz-Mochon JJ, Tourniaire G, Bradley M. Microarray platforms for enzymatic and cell-based assays. Chemical Society Reviews 2007;36(3):449-457.
    • 30. Takeuchi I, Lauterbach J, Fasolka MJ. Combinatorial Materials Synthesis. Materials Today 2005:18-26.
    • 31. de Gans BJ, Duineveld PC, Schubert US. Inkjet printing of polymers: State of the art and future developments. Advanced Materials 2004 Feb;16(3):203-213.
    • 32. de Gans BJ, Schubert US. Inkjet printing of well-defined polymer dots and arrays. Langmuir 2004 Aug;20(18):7789-7793.
    • 33. Zhang R, Liberski A, Khan F, Diaz-Mochon JJ, Bradley M. Inkjet fabrication of hydrogel microarrays using in situ nanolitre-scale polymerisation. Chemical Communications 2008 Mar(11):1317-1319.
    • 34. Anderson DG, Levenberg S, Langer R. Nanoliter-scale synthesis of arrayed biomaterials and application to human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotechnology 2004 Jul;22(7):863-866.
    • 35. Folkman J, Moscona A. Role of Cell-Shape in Growth-Control. Nature 1978;273(5661):345-349.
    • 36. Anderson DG, Putnam D, Lavik EB, Mahmood TA, Langer R. Biomaterial microarrays: rapid, microscale screening of polymer-cell interaction. Biomaterials 2005 Aug;26(23):4892-4897.
    • 37. Hern DL, Hubbell JA. Incorporation of adhesion peptides into nonadhesive hydrogels useful for tissue resurfacing. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1998 Feb;39(2):266-276.
    • 38. Mant A, Tourniaire G, Diaz-Mochon JJ, Elliott TJ, Williams AP, Bradley M. Polymer microarrays: Identification of substrates for phagocytosis assays. Biomaterials 2006 Oct;27(30):5299-5306.
    • 39. Liberski AR, Tizzard GJ, Diaz-Mochon JJ, Hursthouse MB, Milnes P, Bradley M. Screening for Polymorphs on Polymer Microarrays. Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry 2008;10:24-27.
    • 40. Simon CG, Stephens JS, Dorsey SM, Becker ML. Fabrication of combinatorial polymer scaffold libraries. Review of Scientific Instruments 2007 Jul;78(7).
    • 41. Yang Y, Bolikal D, Becker ML, Kohn J, Zeiger DN, Simon CG. Combinatorial polymer scaffold libraries for screening cell-biomaterial interactions in 3D. Advanced Materials 2008 Jun;20(11):2037-+.
    • 42. Garbassi F, Morra, M., Occhiello, E. Polymer Surfaces: from physics to technology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1998.
    • 43. Thissen H, Johnson G, McFarland G, Verbiest BCH, Gengenbach T, Voelckera NH. Microarrays for the evaluation of cell-biomaterial surface interactions - art. no. 64130B. In: Voelcker NH, editor. Smart Materials Iv, 2007. p. B4130-B4130.
    • 44. Meredith JC, Karim A, Amis EJ. Combinatorial methods for investigations in polymer materials science. MRS Bull 2002 Apr;27(4):330-335.
    • 45. Tweedie CA, Anderson DG, Langer R, Van Vliet KJ. Combinatorial material mechanics: High-throughput polymer synthesis and nanomechanical screening. Advanced Materials 2005 Nov;17(21):2599-+.
    • 46. Sormana JL, Meredith JC. High-throughput discovery of structuremechanical property relationships for segmented poly(urethane-urea)s. Macromolecules 2004 Mar;37(6):2186-2195.
    • 47. Thaburet JFO, Mizomoto H, Bradley M. High-throughput evaluation of the wettability of polymer libraries. Macromolecular Rapid Communications 2004 Jan;25(1):366-370.
    • 48. Vickerman JC, Briggs D, editors. ToF-SIMS - Surface Analysis by Mass Spectrometry. Manchester: IM Publications and SurfaceSpectra Ltd, 2001.
    • 49. Briggs D. Surface Analysis of Polymers by XPS and Static SIMS. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
    • 50. Feldman LC, Mayer JW. Fundamentals of Surface and Thin Film Analysis. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing Co., 1986.
    • 51. Briggs D, Seah MP. Practical Surface Analysis: Auger and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Chichester: Wiley, 1990.
    • 52. Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C. Atomic Force Microscope. Physical Review Letters 1986 Mar;56(9):930-933.
    • 53. Morris VJ, Kirby AR, Gunning AP. Atomic Force Microscopy for Biologists. London: Imperial College Press, 1999.
    • 54. Lal R, John SA. Biological Applications of Atomic-Force Microscopy. Am J Physiol 1994 Jan;266(1):C1-&.
    • 55. Vansteenkiste SO, Davies MC, Roberts CJ, Tendler SJB. Scanning probe microscopy of biomedical interfaces. Prog Surf Sci 1998 Feb;57(2):95-136.
    • 56. Vansteenkiste SO, Corneillie SI, Schacht EH, Chen X, Davies MC, Moens M, et al. Direct measurement of protein adhesion at biomaterial surfaces by scanning force microscopy. Langmuir 2000 Apr;16(7):3330-3336.
    • 57. Bhushan B, Koinkar VN. Nanoindentation Hardness Measurements Using Atomic-Force Microscopy. Appl Phys Lett 1994 Mar;64(13):1653-1655.
    • 58. Castner DG, Ratner BD. Biomedical surface science: Foundations to frontiers. Surface Science 2002 Mar;500(1-3):28-60.
    • 59. Colbourn EA. Computer-Simulation of Defects and Reactions at Oxide Surfaces. Surface Science Reports 1992;15(8):281-319.
    • 60. Lamberti C. The use of synchrotron radiation techniques in the characterization of strained semiconductor heterostructures and thin films. Surface Science Reports 2004;53(1-5):1-197.
    • 61. Taylor M, Urquhart AJ, Anderson DG, Williams PM, Langer R, Alexander MR, et al. A Methodology for Investigating Protein Adhesion and Adsorption to Microarrayed Combinatorial Polymers. Macromolecular Rapid Communications 2008;29(15):1298-1302.
    • 62. Graham DJ, Wagner MS, Castner DG. Information from complexity: Challenges of TOF-SIMS data interpretation. Applied Surface Science 2006 Jul;252(19):6860-6868.
    • 63. Tyler B. Interpretation of TOF-SIMS images: multivariate and univariate approaches to image de-noising, image segmentation and compound identification. Applied Surface Science 2003 Jan;203:825-831.
    • 64. Biesinger MC, Paepegaey PY, McIntyre NS, Harbottle RR, Petersent NO. Principal component analysis of TOF-SIMS images of organic monolayers. Analytical Chemistry 2002 Nov;74(22):5711-5716.
    • 65. Henry M, Dupont-Gillain C, Bertrand P. Characterization of insulin adsorption in the presence of albumin by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Langmuir 2008 Jan;24(2):458-464.
    • 66. Wagner MS, Castner DG. Characterization of adsorbed protein films by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry with principal component analysis. Langmuir 2001 Jul;17(15):4649-4660.
    • 67. Yang L, Lua YY, Jiang GL, Tyler BJ, Linford MR. Multivariate analysis of TOF-SIMS spectra of monolayers on scribed silicon. Analytical Chemistry 2005 Jul;77(14):4654-4661.
    • 68. Baytekin HT, Wirth T, Gross T, Treu D, Sahre M, Theisen J, et al. Determination of wettability of surface-modified hot-embossed polycarbonate wafers used in microfluidic device fabrication via XPS and ToF-SIMS. Surface and Interface Analysis 2008 Mar-Apr;40(3-4):358-363.
    • 69. Belu AM, Yang ZP, Aslami R, Chilkoti A. Enhanced TOF-SIMS imaging of a micropatterned protein by stable isotope protein labeling. Analytical Chemistry 2001 Jan;73(2):143-150.
    • 70. Hashimoto H, Nakamura K, Takase H, Okamoto T, Yamamoto N. Quantitative TOF-SIMS imaging of DNA microarrays produced by bubble jet printing technique and the role of TOF-SIMS in life science industry. Applied Surface Science 2004 Jun;231-2:385-391.
    • 71. Lee CY, Harbers GM, Grainger DW, Gamble LJ, Castner DG. Fluorescence, XPS, and TOF-SIMS surface chemical state image analysis of DNA microarrays. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2007 Aug;129(30):9429-9438.
    • 72. Belu AM, Graham DJ, Castner DG. Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry: techniques and applications for the characterization of biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials 2003 Sep;24(21):3635-3653.
    • 73. Green FM, Gilmore IS, Seah MP. Mass accuracy- TOF-SIMS. Applied Surface Science 2006 Jul;252(19):6591-6593.
    • 74. Briggs D, Fletcher IW, Goncalves NM. Positive secondary ion mass spectrum of poly(methyl methacrylate): a high mass resolution ToF-SIMS study. Surface and Interface Analysis 2000 May;29(5):303-309.
    • 75. Ward RJ, Wood BJ. A Comparison of Experimental and Theoretically Derived Sensitivity Factors for Xps. Surface and Interface Analysis 1992 Sep;18(9):679-684.
    • 76. Urquhart AJ, Taylor M, Anderson DG, Langer R, Davies MC, Alexander MR. TOF-SIMS analysis of a 576 micropatterned copolymer array to reveal surface moieties that control wettability. Analytical Chemistry 2008 Jan;80(1):135-142.
    • 77. Barnes G. Interfacial science: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
    • 78. Whitesides GM, Laibinis PE. Wet Chemical Approaches to the Characterization of Organic-Surfaces - Self-Assembled Monolayers, Wetting, and the Physical Organic-Chemistry of the Solid Liquid Interface. Langmuir 1990 Jan;6(1):87-96.
    • 79. Bain CD, Whitesides GM. A Study by Contact-Angle of the Acid-Base Behavior of Monolayers Containing Omega-Mercaptocarboxylic Acids Adsorbed on Gold - an Example of Reactive Spreading. Langmuir 1989 NovDec;5(6):1370-1378.
    • 80. Wenzel RN. Surface Roughness and Contact Angle. Journal of Physical and Colloid Chemistry 1949;53(9):1466-1467.
    • 81. Herzberg WJ, Marian JE. Relationship between Contact Angle and Drop Size. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 1970;33(1):161-&.
    • 82. Pease DC. The Significance of the Contact Angle in Relation to the Solid Surface. Journal of Physical Chemistry 1945;49(2):107-110.
    • 83. Urquhart AJ, Anderson DG, Taylor M, Alexander MR, Langer R, Davies MC. High throughput surface characterisation of a combinatorial material library. Advanced Materials 2007 Sep;19(18):2486-2490.
    • 84. Gustavsson P, Johansson, F., Kanje, M., Wallman, L., Linsmeier, C.E. Neurite guidance on protein micropatterns generated by a piezoelectric microdispenser. Biomaterials 2007;28:1141-1151.
    • 85. Barry JJA, Howard D, Shakesheff KM, Howdle SM, Alexander MR. Using a core-sheath distribution of surface chemistry through 3D tissue engineering scaffolds to control cell ingress. Advanced Materials 2006 Jun 6;18(11):1406-+.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article