Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gibbs, Graham R. (2010)
Publisher: The Maths, Stats and OR Network
Languages: English
Types: Part of book or chapter of book
Subjects: BF, HM, H1

Classified by OpenAIRE into

The issues concerning numeracy and quantitative skills that exist for social scientists are somewhat different from those affecting many within the natural sciences and technology-related disciplines. In general students do not need to model systems algebraically or symbolically although they do need a good sense of number (scale, size, etc.) and an understanding of some of the logical principles and thinking that underlie mathematical proofs. The main area of application of these skills is in research methods and statistics.\ud Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) benchmarks and the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Training Guidelines for postgraduates are very clear about the importance of methods and statistics in the social science disciplines. However, key surveys suggest that there is ‘a crisis of numeracy’ in social science disciplines. Many students are ill equipped to undertake quantitative work and there is a shortage of suitably qualified teachers. The response by academics has been, in part, to provide a range of mathematics support for students who need it. Alongside this, teachers have adopted a range of approaches to teaching quantitative methods including teaching statistics using formulae, teaching statistics using step-by-step instructions, and even teaching statistics without either calculations or formulae.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Dancey, C.P. & Reidy, J. Statistics Without Maths for Psychology (Harlow: Pearson, 2004, 3rd ed.).
    • Howitt, D. & Cramer, D. Introduction to Statistics in Psychology (Harlow: Pearson. 2005, 3rd ed.).
    • Mulhern, G. & Wylie, J. “Mathematical Prerequisites for Learning Statistics in Psychology: Assessing Core Skills of Numeracy and Mathematical Reasoning among Undergraduates”, Psychology Learning and Teaching, vol. 5, no. 2 (2005): 119‑132.
    • Murtonen, M. & Lehtinen, E. “'Difficulties Experienced by Education and Sociology Students in Quantitative Methods Courses”, 'Studies in Higher Education, vol 28, no. 2 (2003): 171-185.
    • QAA. “Honours Degree Benchmark Statements”. Accessible via www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/honours/default.asp, (25 February 2010).
    • Williams, M.. Baseline Study of Quantitative Methods in British Sociology, CSAP Project Report (2007). Accessible via www.csap.bham.ac.uk/resources/project_reports/findings/ (25 February 2010).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article