LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: HS
The process of ‘cumulative extremism,’ whether known as ‘tit-for-tat radicalisation’, ‘echoes of\ud extremism’, ‘reciprocal radicalisation’, ‘connectivity between extremisms’ or simply as an\ud ‘escalating spiral of tension’, will be familiar to most researchers working in the field of\ud terrorism and political violence. In recent years, the concept has been used effectively to call for greater attention to be paid to the interactions between opposing groups and ideologies – arguably a welcome adjustment to the\ud overwhelming focus on Islamist terrorism in the immediate post-9/11 context. However, in spite of\ud the growing popularity of this concept – particularly in policy circles – there has been surprisingly little attempt made either to define and describe these processes of ‘cumulative extremism’ and the mechanisms through which they operate in any significant detail, or to critically engage with possible limitations of this concept. \ud This paper calls for just such a project, and sets out a series of issues that such a\ud project ought to address. In particular, we argue\ud that, to be properly understood, beyond a simplistic binary notion of two opposing political poles locked into a cycle of escalating antagonism, a more holistic range of factors and actors needs to be considered including the role played by public authorities and the mainstream media, whose actions can be equally important in shaping how political actors frame contentious issues and the repertoires of protest that they deploy.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article