LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Understanding the effects of website design features on website usage is complicated when buyers differ in their willingness to process information to make decisions for some are maximizers and others satisficers. However it becomes more difficult for a new-to-market estore with no established familiarity. While extant literature suggests the use of interactivity and personalization features offered by e-stores to reduce consumers’ risk perceptions and improve trustworthiness of such stores, there is little guidance on the level of feature provision required to enhance consumer satisfaction in making product selections from a new and unfamiliar e-store. The authors explore this issue in an online experiment with 273 subjects browsing 4 websites offering identical products but with variable levels of interactivity and personalization features. Findings reveal a positive association between the level of feature provision and browser decision-making outcomes. However, interactivity features are more effective for maximizers, whereas personalization ones are more effective for satisficers.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A., 2005. Personalization technologies: a process-oriented perspective. Commun. ACM. 48, 83-90.
    • Ansari, A., Mela, C.F., 2003. E-Customization. J. Marketing Res. XL, 131-145.
    • Ariely, D., 2000. Controlling the information flow: effects on consumers' decision making and preferences. J. Consum Res. 27. 233-248.
    • Ballantine, P.W., 2005. Effects of interactivity and product information on consumer satisfaction in an online retail setting. Int. J. Retail and Dist. Manag. 33, 461-471.
    • Bart, Y., Shankar, V., Sultan, F., Urban, G.L., 2005. Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study. J. Marketing. 69, 133-152.
    • Berry, L.L., 1995. Relationship marketing of services - growing interest, emerging perspective. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 23, 236-245.
    • Berthon, P.L., Pitt, L.F., Watson, R.T., 1996. Marketing communication and the world wide web. Bus. Horizons 39, 151-163.
    • Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., 1981. Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. Cogn. Assess. 309-392.
    • Chowdhury, T. G., Ratneshwar, S., Mohanty, P., 2009. The time-harried shopper: exploring the differences between maximizers and satisficers. Market. Lett. 20, 155-167.
    • Chung, H., Zhao, X., 2004. Effects of Perceived Interactivity on Web Site Preference and Memory: Role of Personal Motivation. J. Comput. Commun. 10, 00-00.
    • Cohen, J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement of nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37- 46.
    • Corritore, C.L., Kracher, B., Wiedenbeck, S., 2003. Online trust: concepts, evolving themes: a model. Int. J. Hum-Comput. St. 58, 737-358.
    • Dholakia, R.R., Zhao, M., 2009. Retail web site interactivity. Int. J. Retail. and Dist. Manag. 37, 821-838.
    • Dowling, G.R., Staelin, S., 1994. A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. J. Consum. Res, 21, 119-134.
    • Fornell, C., Johnson, M.D., Anderson, E.W., Cha, J., Bryant, B.E., 1996. The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. J. Marketing. 60, 7-18.
    • Ganesh, J. Reynolds, K.E., Luckett, M., Pomirleanu, N., 2010. Online shopper motivations, and e-store attributes: an examination of online patronage behavior and shopper typologies. J. Retailing. 86, 106-115.
    • Geissler, G.L., Zinkhan, G.M., Watson, R.T., 2006. The influence of home page complexity on consumer attention, attitudes, and purchase intent. J. Advertising. 35, 69-80.
    • Ghose, S., Dou, W., 1998. Interactive Functions and Their Impacts on the Appeal of Internet Presence Sites. J. Advertising Res. 38, 29-43.
    • Gist, M.E., Mitchell, T.R., 1992. Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Acad. Manag. Rev. 17, 183-211.
    • Heitmann, M., Lehmann, D.R., Herrman, A., 2007. Choice goal attainment and decision and consumption satisfaction. J. Marketing Res. XLIV, 234-250.
    • Hershberger, W.A., 1989. Volitional action: conation and control. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
    • Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P., 1996. Marketing in hypermedia: computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. J. Marketing. 60, 50-68.
    • Iyengar, S.S., Wells, R.E., Schwartz, B. 2006. Doing better but feeling worse: looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychol. Sci. 17, 143-150.
    • Iyengar, S.S., Lepper, M.R., 2000. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79, 995 -1006.
    • Jacoby, J., Speller, D. E., Kohn, C.A., 1974. Brand choice behavior as a function of information load. J. Marketing Res. XI , 63-69.
    • Jarvenpaa, S., Tractinsky, N., Vitale, M., 2000. Consumer trust in an internet store, Inform. Technol Manage, 1, 45-71.
    • Johnson, M.S., Sivadas, E., Garbarino, E., 2008. Customer satisfaction, perceived risk and affective commitment: an investigation of directions of influence. J. Serv. Mark. 22, 353-362.
    • Jones, M.A., Mothersbaugh, D.L., Beatty, S.E,. 2000. Switching barriers and repurchase intentions in services. J. Retailing. 76, 259-274.
    • Koufaris, M., Hampton-Sosa, W., 2004. The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Inform. Manage. 41, 377-397.
    • Lee, E.J., Park, J.K., 2009. Online service personalization for apparel shopping. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 16, 83-91.
    • Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., Brown, J. 2006. Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! Beh. Inform. Tech., 25, 115-126.
    • Liu, Y., Shrum, L. J., 2009. A dual-process model of interactivity effects. J. Advertising. 38, 53-68.
    • Silverman, B.G., Bachann, M., Al-Akharas, K., 2001. Implications of buyer decision theory for design of e-commerce websites. Int. J. Hum-Comput. St. 55, 815-844.
    • Song, J.H., Zinkhan, G.M., 2008. Determinants of perceived web site interactivity. J. Marketing. 72, 99-113.
    • Sternthal, B., Tybout, A., Calder, B.J. (1994), Experimental design: Generalization and theoretical explanation. In R.P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Principles of Marketing Research (pp. 195-223). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    • Urban, G.L., Hauser, J.R., Liberali, G., Braun, M., Sultan, F., 2009. Morph the web to build empathy, trust and sales. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50, 53-61.
    • Van Noort, G., Voorveld, H.A.M., van Reijmersdal, E.A., 2012. Interactivity in Brand Web Sites: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Responses Explained by Consumers' Online Flow Experience. J. Interact. Mark. 26, 223-234.
    • Vesanen, J., 2007, What is personalization? A conceptual framework. Eur. J. Marketing, 41 409-418.
    • Voorveld, H.A.M., Neijens, P.C., Smit, E.G., 2011. The relation between actual and perceived interactivity. J Advertising, 40, 77-92.
    • Wang, Y.J., Minot, M.S., Wei, J., 2011. Aesthetics and the online shopping environment: understanding consumer responses. J. Retailing. 87, 46-58.
    • Wolfinbarger, M., Gilly, M.C. 2001. Shopping online for freedom, control and fun. Calif. Manage. Rev. 43, 34-55.
    • Wu, L-L., Lin, J-Y., 2006. The quality of consumers' decision-making in the environment of e-commerce. Psychol. and Market. 23, 297-311.
    • Yeh, Y.S., Li, Y.M., 2014. Design-to-lure in the e-shopping environment: A landscape preference approach. Inf. Manag. 51, 995-1004.
    • Zhang, S., Fitzsimons, G. J. 1999. Choice-process satisfaction: The influence of attribute alignability and option limitation. Org. Beh. Hum. Dec. Proc.77, 192-214.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article