LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: V590
This paper explores the usefulness of the ‘ethical matrix’, proposed by Ben Mepham, as a tool in technology assessment, specifically in food ethics. We consider what the matrix is, how it might be useful as a tool in ethical decisionmaking, and what drawbacks might be associated with it. We suggest that it is helpful for fact-finding in ethical debates relating to food ethics; but that it is\ud much less helpful in terms of weighing the different ethical problems that it uncovers. Despite this drawback, we maintain that, with some modifications, the ethical matrix can be a useful tool in debates in food ethics. We argue that useful modifications might be to include future generations amongst the stakeholders in the matrix, and to substitute the principle of solidarity for the principle of justice.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baier K (1965) The moral point of view-a rational basis for ethics. Random House, New York
    • Beauchamp T, Childress J (1994) Principles of biomedical ethics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
    • Benn P (1998) Ethics. UCL, London
    • Boxsel JAM (1991) Konstruktive Technikfolgenabscha¨tzung in den Niederlanden. In: Kornwachs K (ed) Reichweite und Potential der Technikfolgenabscha¨tzung. Stuttgart, pp 137-154
    • European Commission (1999) Consumer policy and health protection directorate: Report on animal welfare aspects of the use of bovine somatrophin. Bruxelles
    • Food Ethics Council (2001) After FMD: aiming for a values-driven agriculture, Food Ethics Council Report IV. http://wwwfoodethicscouncilorg
    • Gethmann CF, Grunwald A (1996) Technikfolgenabscha¨tzung: Konzeptionen im U¨ berblick. In: Graue Reihe, Europa¨ische Akademie zur Erforschung von Folgen wissenschaftlichtechnischer Entwicklungen, no 1
    • Gewirth A (1984) The justificatory argument for human rights. Social Philosophy & Policy 1(2): 1-24
    • Goodin R (2000) Democratic deliberation within. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20: 81-109
    • Gosepath S (1999) Praktische Rationalita¨t-Eine Problemu¨bersicht. In: Gosepath S (ed) Motive, Gru¨nde, Zwecke-Theorien praktischer Rationalita¨t. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt
    • Kaiser M, Forsberg E-M (2001) Assessing fisheries-using an ethical matrix in a participatory process. J Agric Environ Ethics 14: 191-200
    • LaFollette H (ed) (2000) Ethical theory. Blackwell, Oxford
    • MAFF (1995) Report of the committee to consider the ethical implications of emerging technologies in the breeding of farm animals. HMSO, London
    • Mepham B (2000) A framework for the ethical analysis of novel foods: the ethical matrix. J Agric Environ Ethics 12: 165-176
    • Mepham B (2001) Comments on the matrix
    • O'Neill O (2002) A question of trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
    • Plato (1993) Der Staat. Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg
    • Plumwood V (2000) Deep ecology, deep pockets and deep problems: a feminist ecosocialist analysis. In: Light, Katz, Rothenberg (eds) Beneath the surface: critical essays in the philosophy of deep ecology. Cambridge MIT Press, pp 59-84
    • Rachels J (1993) Elements of moral philosophy
    • Rawls J (1951) Outline of a decision procedure for ethics. The Philosophical Review 60: 177-197
    • Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice, rev edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
    • Rawls J (1999a) The law of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts
    • Rorty R (1989) Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
    • Singer P (ed) (1991) A companion to ethics. Blackwell, Oxford
    • Sterba J (ed) (1998) Ethics: the big questions. Blackwell, Oxford
    • Steiner H (2002) Persons and times. In: Chadwick R, Schroeder D (eds) Applied ethics, vol VI. pp 286-297
    • UCDavis Health Systems (2000) Cirrhosis. http://wellnessucdavisedu/medical_conditions_az/cirrhosis75html
    • UK Transplant (2002) Activity summary for 2001. http://wwwuktransplantorguk/statistics/ general_statistics/activity_summary_2001htm
    • Van De Veer D (1979) Interspecific justice. Inquiry 22: 55-79
    • World Health Organisation (2002) Water and sanitation. http://wwwwhoint/water_sanitation_health/General/factsandfigureshtm
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article