Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fisher, Katie; Towler, John; Eimer, Martin (2016)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: psyc

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: genetic structures, sense organs, eye diseases
Face recognition is known to be impaired when the contrast polarity of the eyes is inverted. We studied how contrast affects early perceptual face processing by measuring the face-sensitive N170 component to face images when the contrast of the eyes and of the rest of the face was independently manipulated. Fixation was either located on the eye region or on the lower part of a face. Contrast-reversal of the eyes triggered delayed and enhanced N170 components independently of the contrast of other face parts, and regardless of gaze location. Similar N170 modulations were observed when the rest of a face was contrast-inverted, but only when gaze was directed away from the eyes. Results demonstrate that the contrast of the eyes and of other face parts can both affect face perception, but that the contrast polarity of the eye region has a privileged role during early stages of face processing.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551-565. doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
    • Chan, A.W.Y., Kravitz, D. J., Truong, S., Arizpe, J., & Baker, C. I. (2010). Cortical representations of bodies and faces are strongest in commonly experienced configurations. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 417-418. doi:10.1038/nn.2502
    • De Lissa, P., McArthur, G., Hawelka, S., Palermo, R., Mahajan, Y., & Hutzler, F. (2014). Fixation location on upright and inverted faces modulates the N170. Neuropsychologia, 57, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.006
    • Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44, 576-585. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001
    • Eimer, M. (1998). Does the face-specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor? Neuroreport, 9, 2945-2948. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199809140-00005
    • Eimer, M. (2000). Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 694-705. doi:10.1016/S1388- 2457(99)00285-0
    • Eimer, M. (2011). The face-sensitive N170 component of the event-related brain potential. In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. H. Johnson, & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception.(pp. 329-344). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Galper, R.E. (1970). Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Science, 19, 207- 208.
    • Gandhi, T., Suresh, N., & Sinha, P. (2012). EEG responses to facial contrast-chimeras. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 11, 201-211. doi:10.1142/S021963521250015X
    • Gilad, S., Meng, M., & Sinha, P. (2009). Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 5353-5358. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812396106
    • Hsiao, J. H., & Cottrell, G. (2008). Two Fixations Suffice in Face Recognition. Psychological Science, 19, 998-1006. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02191.x
    • Itier, R. J., Alain, C., Sedore, K., & McIntosh, A. R. (2007). Early face processing specificity: It's in the eyes! Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1815-1826. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1815
    • Itier, R. J., Latinus, M., & Taylor, M. J. (2006). Face, eye and object early processing: What is the face specificity? NeuroImage, 29, 667-676. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.041
    • Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2002). Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: a repetition study using ERPs. Neuroimage, 15, 353-372. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0982
    • Johnston, A., Hill, H., & Carman, N. (1992). Recognising faces: effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception, 21, 365-375. doi:10.1068/p210365
    • Kemp, R., Pike, G., White, P., & Musselman, A. (1996). Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: the role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues. Perception, 25, 37-52. doi:10.1068/p250037
    • Laguesse, R., Dormal, G., Biervoye, A., Kuefner, D., & Rossion, B. (2012). Extensive visual training in adulthood significantly reduces the face inversion effect. Journal of Vision, 12, 14-14. doi:10.1167/12.10.14
    • Liu, C. H., Collin, C. A., Burton, A. M., & Chaudhuri, A. (1999). Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative. Vision Research, 39, 4003-4009. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00109-1
    • Liu, C. H., Collin, C. A., & Chaudhuri, A. (2000). Does face recognition rely on encoding of 3-D surface? Examining the role of shape-from-shading and shape-from-stereo. Perception, 29, 729-743. doi:10.1068/p3065
    • Nederhouser, M., Yue, X., Mangini, M. C., & Biederman, I. (2007). The deleterious effect of contrast reversal on recognition is unique to faces, not objects. Vision Research, 47, 2134- 2142. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.007
    • Nemrodov, D., Anderson, T., Preston, F. F., & Itier, R. J. (2014). Early sensitivity for eyes within faces: A new neuronal account of holistic and featural processing. NeuroImage, 97, 81-94. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.042
    • Orban de Xivry, J.-J., Ramon, M., Lefèvre, P., Rossion, B. (2008). Reduced fixation on the upper area of personally familiar faces following acquired prosopagnosia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2, 245-268. doi: 10.1348/174866407X260199
    • Peterson, M. F., & Eckstein, M. P. (2012). Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, E3314-E3323. doi:10.1073/pnas.1214269109
    • Rossion, B. (2009). Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 132, 300-312. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.08.002
    • Rossion, B., Delvenne, J. F., Debatisse, D., Goffaux, V., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., & Guérit, J. M. (1999). Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study. Biological Psychology, 50, 173-189. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00013-7
    • Russell, R., Sinha, P., Biederman, I., & Nederhouser, M. (2006). Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation. Perception, 35, 749-759. doi:10.1068/p5490
    • Sinha, P. (2002). Qualitative representations for recognition. In H. H. Bulthoff, S-W. Lee, T. A. Poggio, & C. Wallraven (Eds.), In Biologically Motivated Computer Vision (pp. 249-262). Berlin: Springer.
    • Sormaz, M., Andrews, T. J., & Young, A. W. (2013). Contrast negation and the importance of
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article