Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Article
This paper examines the strategic implications of resource allocation models (RAMs). Four interrelated aspects of resource allocation are discussed: degree of centralisation, locus of strategic direction, cross-subsidy, and locus of control. The paper begins with a theoretical overview of these concepts, locating the study in the contexts of both strategic management literature and the university. The concepts are then examined empirically, drawing upon a longitudinal study of three UK universities, Warwick, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), and Oxford Brookes. Findings suggest that RAMs are historically and culturally situated within the context of each university and this is associated with different patterns of strategic direction and forms of strategic control. As such, the RAM in use may be less a matter of best practice than one of internal fit. The paper concludes with some implications for theory and practice by discussing the potential trajectories of each type of RAM.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ahuja, G., and Lampert, C. M. (2001). “Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions.” Strategic Management Journal, 22, 6-7, 521- 544.
    • Barley, S.B. (1995). Images of Imaging: Notes on Doing Longitudinal Fieldwork. In G.P. Huber & A.H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Longitudinal Field Research Methods: Studying Processes of Organisational Change. (pp. 1-37). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
    • Bastin, N. A. (1990). “The Composition of Governing Bodies of Higher Education Corporations.” Higher Education Quarterly, 44, 3, 245-263.
    • Bettis, R. A., and Prahalad, C. K. (1995). “The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension.” Strategic Management Journal, 16, 5-14.
    • Campbell, A., and Gould, M. (1988). “Adding Value from Corporate Headquarters.” London Business School Journal, Summer.
    • Campbell, A., Goold, M., & Alexander, M. (1995). The Value of the Parent Company. California Management Review, 38, 79-97.
    • Child, J (1997). "Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect." Organization Studies, 18, 1, 43-76.
    • Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Oxford, UK: IAU Press.
    • Cohen, M. D., and Bacdayan, P. (1994). “Organizational Routines are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study.” Organization Science, 5, 4, 554-568.
    • Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., and Winter, S., (1996). “Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 3, 653-698.
    • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1972). “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1, 1-25.
    • Cohen, M. D. and March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and Ambiguity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • Curren, P. (2000). “Competition in UK Higher Education: Competitive Advantage in the Research Assessment Exercise and Porter‟s Diamond Model.” Higher Education Quarterly, 54, 4, 386-410.
    • Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    • Deem, R., and Johnson, R. (1999). “Managerialism and University Managers: Building New Academic Communities or Disrupting Old Ones?” Society for Research in Higher Education, Manchester, 15 December.
    • Denzin, N. K. (1989, 1978, 1970) The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
    • Eisenhardt K.M. (1989). "Building Theories From Case Study Research." The Academy of Management Review, 14, 4, 532-50.
    • El Khawas, E. (1995). “Where is the Faculty Voice in Recent Academic Decisions?” Tertiary Education and Management, 1, 1, 31-35.
    • Eustace, R. (1994). “University Autonomy: The 80s and After.” Higher Education Quarterly, 48, 2, 86-117.
    • Ferlie, E. (1992). The Creation and Evolution of Quasi Markets in the Public Sector: A Problem for Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 79-97.
    • Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., and Pettigrew, A. (1996). The New Public Management in Action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    • Finkelstein, S., and Hambrick, D. (1996) Strategic Leadership. Top Executives and Their Effects on Organisations. St. Paul, Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.
    • Fox-Wolfgramm, S.J. (1997). Towards Developing a Methodology for Doing Qualitative Research: the Dynamic-Comparative Case Study Method. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13, 439-456.
    • Garvin, D. A. (1998). "The Processes of Organization and Management." Sloan Management Review, Summer, 33-50.
    • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    • Gioia, D. A., and Thomas, J. B. (1996). "Identity, Image and Issue Interpretation: Sensemaking During Strategic Change in Academia." Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 3, 370-403.
    • Goedegebuure, L., and de Boer, H. (1996). “Governance and Decision-Making in Higher Education.” Tertiary Education and Management, 2, 2, 160-169.
    • Golden, B. R. (1992). "The Past Is the Past - or Is It? The Use of Retrospective Accounts As Indicators of Past Strategy." Academy of Management Journal, 35, 4, 848-60.
    • Goold, M. (1991). “Strategic Control in the Decentralized Firm.” Sloan Management Review, Winter, 69-81.
    • Goold, M., and Campbell, A. (2000). “Taking Stock of Synergy.” Long Range Planning, 33, 72-96.
    • Grant, R.M. (1988). On 'Dominant Logic', Relatedness and the Link between Diversity and Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 639-642.
    • Hackman, J. D. (1985). "Power and Centrality in the Allocation of Resources in Colleges and Universities." Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, March, 61-77.
    • Hambrick, D. C., and Mason, P. A. (1984). "Upper Echelons: The Organisation As a Reflection of Its Top Managers." Academy of Management Review, 9, 2, 193-206.
    • Handy, C. B. (1981). Understanding Organisations. Middlesex, UK: Penguin Books.
    • Hannan, M. T., and Freeman, J. (1984) “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review, 49, 149-164.
    • Hanks, S. H. (1990). “The Organisation Life Cycle: Integrating Content and Process.” Journal of Small Business Strategy, 1, 1, 1-12.
    • Hardy, C. (1996). “Understanding Power: Bringing About Strategic Change.” British Journal of Management, 7, Special Issue, 3-16.
    • Hardy, C., and Clegg, S.R. (1996). Some Dare Call it Power. In S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W.R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies. (pp. 622-641). London: Sage Publications.
    • Hardy, C., and Leiba-O‟Sullivan, L. (1998). “The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice.” Human Relations, 51, 4, 451-483.
    • Hedley, B. (1988). “Strategy and the Business Portfolio.” Long Range Planning, 10, 9-15.
    • Henderson, R. M., and Clark, K. B. (1990). “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
    • Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., Lee, A., Schneck, E., and Pennings, J. M. (1971). “A Strategic Contingencies Theory of Intraorganizational Power.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 8, 216-229.
    • Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    • Jick, T. D. (1979). "Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action." Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 4, 602-11.
    • Johnes, G., and Cave, M. (1994). “The Development of Competition Amongst Higher Education Institutions. “ In Bartlett, W. Propper, C., Wilson, D., and Le Grand, J. (Editors) Quasi Markets in the Welfare State. (pp. 269-282) Bristol, UK: SAUS Publications.
    • Johnson, R. (2000). “The Meaning of Collegiality When in Tension with Managerialism: The Value Basis of Academic Work and Organisation.” In Fowler, G. (editor), Academic Performance. UK: Edwin Millar Press.
    • Khandwalla, P. (1973). Effect of Competition on the Structure of Top Management Control. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 285-295.
    • Khandwalla, P. (1972). The Effect of Different Types of Competition on the Use of Management Controls. Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, 275-285.
    • Langley, A. (1989). "In Search of Rationality: The Purposes Behind the Use of Formal Analysis in Organizations." Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 598-631.
    • Langley, A. (1990). "Patterns in the Use of Formal Analysis in Strategic Decisions." Organization Studies, 11, 1, 17-45.
    • Le Grand, J. (1991) “Quasi Markets and Social Policy.” The Economic Journal, 101, 1256-1267.
    • Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.” Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111-125.
    • March, J. G. (1991) “Exploration and Exploitation in Organisational Learning.” Organization Science, 2, 1, 71- 87.
    • McNay, I. (1995). “From the Collegial Academy to Corporate Enterprise: The Changing Cultures of Universities.” In T. Schuller (ed.) The Changing University? (pp. 105-115). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
    • Miles, M. B., and Hubermann, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook; Qualitative Data Analysis. London, UK: SAGE Publications, Inc.
    • Miller, D. (1992). “The Icarus Paradox: How Excellent Companies Bring About Their Own Downfall.” Business Horizons, 35, 1, 24-36.
    • Miller, H. (1995). The Management of Change in Universities. Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.
    • Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper and Row.
    • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
    • Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Newby, H. (1997) “Anomic, Archaic, Enigmatic: Review of „LSE on Social Science‟. Times Higher Education Supplement. 20 June 1997.
    • Orton, J. D. (1997). "From Inductive to Iterative Grounded Theory: Zipping the Gap Between Process Theory and Process Data." Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13, 4, 419-38.
    • Parker, M., and Jary, D. (1995). “The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity.” Organization, 2, 2, 319-338.
    • Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). "Longitudinal Field Research on Change Theory and Practice." Organization Science, 1, 3, 267-92.
    • Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). "On Studying Managerial Elites." Strategic Management Journal, 13, Winter Special Issue, 163-82.
    • Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). "What Is a Processual Analysis?" Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13, 4, 337-48.
    • Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
    • Prahalad, C. K., and Hamel, G. (1990) “The Core Competence of the Organization.” Harvard Business Review, 68, 3, 79-91.
    • Prichard, C., and Willmott, H. (1997). “Just How Managed is the McUniversity?” Organization Studies, 18, 2, 287-316.
    • Richards, T. J., and Richards, L. (1994). "Using Computers in Qualitative Research." In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. London, UK: SAGE Publications, 445-62.
    • Robertson, D. (1993). “Establishing Strategic Direction in Higher Education Institutions.” Public Money and Management, July-Sept, 45-51.
    • Rumelt, R. (1995) “Inertia and Transformation.” Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Editor C. A. Montgomery, Boston,:Kluwer Academic Publishers, 101-132.
    • Shattock, M. (1999). “Governance and Management in Universities: The Way We Live Now.” Journal of Education Policy, 14, 3, 271-282.
    • Simons, R. (1991). "Strategic Orientation and Top Management Attention to Control Systems." Strategic Management Journal, 12, 49-62.
    • Simons, R. (1994). "How New Top Managers Use Control Systems As Levers of Strategic Renewal." Strategic Management Journal, 15, 169-89.
    • Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive University Structures. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    • Tashakori, M. (1980). Management Succession: From the Owner-Founder to the Professional Manager. New York: Praeger.
    • Thys-Clement, F., and Wilkin, L. (1998). “Strategic Management and Universities: Outcomes of a European Survey.” Higher Education Management, 10, 1, 13-28.
    • Van Maanen, J. (1979). "The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography." Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 539-50.
    • Weick, K.E. (1976). “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
    • Wenger, E. C., and Snyder, W. M. (2000). “Communities of Practice: The Organisational Frontier.” Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb, 139-145.
    • Whittington, R. (1989). Corporate Strategies in Recession and Recovery. London: Unwin Hyman.
    • Whittington, R. (1992). “Putting Giddens into Action: Social Systems and Managerial Agency.” Journal of Management Studies, 29, 6, 693-712.
    • Wiersema, M.F. & Bantel, K.A. (1992). Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 91-121.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article