LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: C800

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: humanities
Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation has not been investigated in friendships. The current studies investigated Machiavellianism, emotional manipulation, and six friendship functions in women's same-sex friendships. For study 1, women (N = 221) completed the Mach IV, emotional manipulation measure (with reference to their own behaviour and their friend's behaviour), mood worsening and use of inauthentic displays from the managing emotions of others scale, and the friendship function measure. Machiavellianism predicted the self-perceived ability to employ emotional manipulation towards a same-sex friend and perceiving their friend to use emotional manipulation towards them. Machiavellianism predicted lower scores on all six friendship functions. For study 2, women (N = 186) completed the Mach IV, the modified emotional manipulation measure (with reference to their own behaviour and their friend's behaviour), and the friendship function measure. Women high on Machiavellianism reported using emotional manipulation more frequently towards their same-sex friend and perceived their same-sex friend to frequently use emotional manipulation towards them. Machiavellianism predicted lower scores on five of the friendship functions. These studies demonstrated that women higher on Machiavellianism employ emotional manipulation in their same-sex friendships. Women with higher Machiavellianism scores also perceived that they themselves were manipulated by their friend.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • managing the emotions of others. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 834-839.
    • Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2003). The Friendship Questionnaire: An investigation of adults with Asperger Sydrome or high functioning Autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 509-517.
    • Benenson, J. F., & Christakos, A. (2003).The greater fragility of females' versus males' closest samesex friendships. Child Development, 74, 1123-1129.
    • Black, P. J., Woodworth, M., & Porter, S. (2014). The Big Bad Wolf? The relation between the Dark Triad and the interpersonal assessment of vulnerability. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 52-56.
    • Blieszer, R., & Adams, R. G. (1992). Adult Friendship. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    • Booth-Kewley, S., Larson, G. E., & Miyoshi, S. K. (2007). Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 463-477.
    • Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 203-252.
    • Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. London: Academic Press.
    • David-Barrett T., Rotkirch A., Carney J., Behncke Izquierdo I., Krems J. A., et al. (2015). Women favour dyadic relationships, but men prefer clubs: Cross-cultural evidence from social networking. PLoS ONE, 10, e0118329.
    • Duffy P. J., Shiflett, S., & Downey, R. G. (1977). Locus of control: Dimensionality and predictability using Likert scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 214-219.
    • Grovle, L., Haugen, A. J., Keller, A., Natvig, B., Brox, J. I., & Grotle, M. (2012). Poor agreement found between self-report and a public registry on duration of sickness absence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, 212-218.
    • Holden, R. R., Wheeler, S., & Marjanovic, Z. (2012). When does random responding distort selfreport personality assessment? An example with the NEO PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 15-20.
    • Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 521- 526.
    • Jonason, P. K., & Schmitt, D. P. (2012). What have you done for me lately? Friendship-selection in the shadow of the Dark Triad traits. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 400-421.
    • Ináncsi, T., Láng, A. G., & Bereczkei, (2015). Machiavellianism and adult attachment in general interpersonal and close relationships. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 11, 139-154.
    • Lyons, M., & Aitken, S. (2010). Machiavellian friends? The role of Machiavellianism in friendship formation and maintenance. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 4, 194- 202.
    • Miller-Ott, A. E., & Kelly, L. (2013). Mean girls in college: An analysis of how college women communicatively construct and account for relational aggression. Women's Studies in Communication, 36, 330-347.
    • Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice Sensitivity: Assessment and Location in the Personality Space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202- 211.
    • Sherry, S. B., Hewitt, P. L., Besser, A., Flett, G. C., & Klein, C. (2006). Machiavellianism, trait perfectionism, and perfectionistic self-presentation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 829-839.
    • Silverman, I., & Choi, J. (2005). Locating places. In D. Buss (Ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology (pp.177-199). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    • Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884.
    • Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2012). The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 794.799.
    • Wastell, C., & Booth, A. (2003). Machiavellianism: An Alexithymic Perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22, 730-744.
    • Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A Synthesis of the Evolutionary and Psychological Literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 285-299.
    • Veselka, L., Aitken Schermer, J., & Vernon, P. A. (2011). Beyond the big five: The dark triad and the supernumerary personality inventory. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 14, 158-168.
    • Vigil, J. M. (2007). Asymmetries in the friendship preferences and social styles of men and women. Human Nature, 18, 143-161.
    • Xie, H., Cairns, B. D., & Cairns, R. B. (2005). The development of aggressive behaviours among girls: Measurement issues, social functions, and differential trajectories. In D. J. Pepler, K. C. Masden, C. Webster & K. S. Levenes (Eds.), The development and treatment of girlhood aggression (pp.105-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • 1 = Age, 2 = Friendship Length, 3 = Machiavellianism, 4 = Emotional Manipulation Frequency, 5 = Emotional Manipulation Friend Frequency, 6 = Companionship, 7 = Help, 8 = Intimacy, 9 = Reliable alliance, 10 = Self-Validation, 11 = Emotional Security Note *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level **Correlations is significant at the 0.01 level
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
    72
    72%
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article