Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Conner, M.; Grogan, S.; Lawton, R.; Armitage, C.; West, R.; Siddiqi, K.; Gannon, B.; Torgerson, C.; Flett, K.; Simms-Ellis, R. (2013)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Types: Article
Subjects: Study Protocol
Background The current literature suggests that forming implementation intentions (simple ?if-then? plans) about how to refuse the offer of a cigarette may be an effective intervention to reduce smoking initiation in adolescents. This study is a pragmatic trial to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of such an intervention in reducing smoking initiation in a sample of UK adolescents. Methods/Design A cluster randomised controlled trial with at least 36 schools randomised to receive an implementation intention intervention targeting reducing smoking initiation (intervention group) or increasing homework (control group). Interventions will be conducted at the classroom level and be repeated every six months for four years (eight interventions). Objectively assessed (carbon monoxide monitor) and self-reported smoking plus smoking related cognitions (e.g., smoking intentions, attitudes, norms and self-efficacy) will be assessed at baseline and 12, 24, 36 and 48 months post baseline. Objectively assessed smoking at 48 months post baseline will be the primary outcome variable. Health economic analyses will assess life years gained. Discussion The results of the trial will provide information on the impact of a repeated implementation intention for refusing offers of cigarettes on rates of smoking initiation in adolescents. Trial registration ISRCTN27596806
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Cancer Research UK: Smoking statistics.; 2012. [On-line] Available: http://info. cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/lung/smoking/ (accessed 12.11.12).
    • 2. Department of Health: Healthy lives, healthy people - A tobacco control plan for England. London: HMSO; 2011.
    • 3. ASH: Facts at a glance.; 2011. [On-line]. Available: http://www.ash.org.uk/ files/documents/ASH_93.pdf (accessed 28.4.11).
    • 4. Paavola M, Vartiainen P, Puska P: Predicting adult smoking: The influence of smoking during adolescent and smoking among friends and family. Health Educ Res 1996, 11:309-315.
    • 5. Royal College of Physicians: Smoking and the young. Suffolk: Lavenham Press; 1992.
    • 6. General Household Survey: 2007 report. London: ONS; 2009.
    • 7. Fuller E, Sanchez M: Smoking, drinking and drug use among young people in England in 2009. London: NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care; 2010.
    • 8. Conner M, Higgins A: Long-term effects of implementation intentions on prevention of smoking uptake among adolescents: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol 2010, 29:529-538.
    • 9. Roland M, Torgerson DT: Understanding controlled trials: What are pragmatic trials? Br Med J 1998, 316:285.
    • 10. Gollwitzer P: Goal achievement: The role of intentions. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 1993, 4:141-185.
    • 11. Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P: Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 2006, 38:69-119.
    • 12. Higgins A, Conner M: Understanding adolescent smoking: The role of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and implementation intentions. Psychol Health Med 2003, 8:177-190.
    • 13. Thomas RE, Perera R: School-based programmes for preventing smoking. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, 3(Art. No. CD001293). doi:10.1002/ 14651858.CD001293.pub2.
    • 14. Wiehe SE, Garrison MM, Christakis DA, Ebel BE, Rivara FP: A systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term followup. J Adolesc Health 2005, 36:162-169.
    • 15. Peterson AV, Kealey KA, Mann SL, Marek PM, Sarason IG: Hutchinson smoking prevention project: Long-term randomizes trial in school-based tobacco use prevention - results on smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000, 92:1979-1991.
    • 16. Campbell R, Starkey F, Holliday J, Audrey S, Bloor M, Parry-Langdon N, Hughes R, Moore I: An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): A cluster randomized trial. Lancet 2008, 371:1595-1602.
    • 17. Sheeran P, Milne S, Webb TL, Gollwitzer PM: Implementation intentions and health behaviours. In Predicting health behaviour. 2nd edition. Edited by Conner M, Norman P. Maidenhead: OU Press; 2005:276-323.
    • 18. Armitage CJ: Efficacy of a brief worksite intervention to reduce smoking: The roles of behavioral and implementation intentions. J Occup Health Psychol 2007, 12:376-390.
    • 19. Armitage CJ: A volitional help sheet to encourage smoking cessation: A randomized exploratory trial. Health Psychol 2008, 27:557-566.
    • 20. Carpenter JR, Kenwood MG: Missing data in clinical trials - a practical guide. Birmingham: National Institute for Health Research; 2008. Publication RM03/ JH17/MK.
    • 21. Campbell M, Elbourne D, Altman D: CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomised trials. Br Med J 2004, 328:702-708.
    • 22. Campbell M, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG: CONSORT 2010 statement: Extension to cluster randomised trials. Br Med J 2012, 345:e5661.
    • 23. Perera R, Heneghan C, Yudkin P: Graphical methods for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions. Br Med J 2007, 334:127-129.
    • 24. Stookey GK, Katz BL, Olson CA, Drook SL, Cohen SJ: Evaluation of biochemical validation measures in determination of smoking status. J Dent Res 1987, 66:1597-1601.
    • 25. Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend C, Vesey C, Saloojee Y: Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from non-smokers. Am J Public Health 1987, 77:1435-1438.
    • 26. Irving JM, Clark EC, Crombie IK, Smith WCS: Evaluation of a portable measure of expired-air carbon monoxide. Prev Med 1988, 17:109-115.
    • 27. Zack M, Belsito L, Scher R, Eissenberg T, Corrigall WA: Effects of abstinence and smoking on information processing in adolescent smokers. Psychopharmacology 2001, 153:249-257.
    • 28. Jarvis L: Smoking among secondary school children in 1996. England. London: HMSO; 1997.
    • 29. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J 2000, 321:694-696.
    • 30. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J 2008, 337:979-983.
    • 31. Conner M, Grogan S, Fry G, Gough B, Higgins AR: Direct, mediated and moderated impacts of personality variables on smoking initiation in adolescents. Psychol Health 2009, 24:1085-1104.
    • 32. Conner M, Sandberg T, McMillan B, Higgins A: Role of anticipated regret in adolescent smoking initiation. Br J Health Psychol 2006, 11:85-101.
    • 33. Grogan S, Conner M, Fry G, Gough B, Higgins A: Gender differences in smoking: A longitudinal study of beliefs predicting smoking in 11-15 year olds. Psychol Health 2009, 24:301-316.
    • 34. Lawton R, Conner M, Parker D: Beyond cognition: Predicting health risk behaviors from instrumental and affective beliefs. Health Psychol 2007, 26:259-267.
    • 35. Raikou M, McGuire A: A review of the cost-effectiveness of interventions (specifically point of sales measures and mass media) to prevent the uptake of smoking in young people under 18 years old, NICE.; 2007.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • RCUK | Smoking prevention in youn...

Cite this article