Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ingram, Julie (2008)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: G1, GE, S1
This paper explores how knowledge is exchanged between agricultural advisors and farmers in the context of sustainable farming practices in England. Specifically the paper examines the nature of the knowledge exchange at the encounters between one group of advisors, agronomists, and farmers. The promotion of best management practices, which are central to the implementation of sustainable agricultural policies in England, provide the empirical context for this study. The paper uses the notion of expert and facilitative approaches as a conceptual framework for analyzing knowledge exchange encounters between agronomists and farmers. Data were derived from semi-structured interviews with 31 agronomists and 17 farmers, in the context of three initiatives promoting a range of best management practices including (a) targeted use of nitrogen (N), (b) use of nutrients within manure, and (c) management practices to improve soil structure. The interviews revealed that, although many agronomist-farmer knowledge exchange encounters are characterized by an imbalance of power, distrust, and the divergence of knowledge, other encounters provide a platform for the facilitation of farmer learning in their transition to more sustainable practices.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Angell, B., J. Francis, A. Chalmers, and C. Flint. 1997. Agriculture and the rural economy: information and advice needs. London: DEFRA.
    • Arce, A.C., and N. Long. 1992. The dynamics of knowledge: interfaces between bureaucrats and peasants. Battlefields of knowledge: the interlocking theory and practice of social research and development, eds. N. Long and A. Long, 211-246. London: Routledge.
    • Archer, J. 2001. Review of current and recent knowledge transfer activities in relation to environmental protection in agriculture. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) Publications.
    • Auerswald, K., and M. Kutilek. 1998. A European view to the protection of the soil resource. Soil Tillage Research 46: 9-11.
    • Bager, T., and J. Proost. 1997. Voluntary regulation and farmers' environmental behaviour in Denmark and The Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis 37 (1): 79-90.
    • Bergsma, E. 1996. The bridge between land use and advisers. Land Husbandry, the International Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 1: 81-93.
    • Bergsma, E. 2000. Incentives of land users in projects of soil and water conservation: the weight of intangibles. Geojournal 50: 47-54.
    • Burgess, J., J. Clark, and C.M. Harrison. 2000. Knowledge in action: actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics 35: 119-132.
    • Busch, L. 1978. On understanding: Two views of communication. Rural Sociology 43 (3): 450- 473.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article