LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Edsig (Educators Special Interest Group)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: other, QA75, LB2300
This paper focuses on the difficulties of assessing multi-year team projects, in which a team of students drawn from all three years of a full-time degree course works on a problem with and for a real-life organization. Although potential solutions to the problem of assessing team projects may be context-dependent, we believe that discussing these in our paper will allow readers\ud to relate to their teaching cases and increase the general appreciation of team project related work. Findings discussed in this paper are based on the first cycle of action research in relation to an existing multi-year team project scheme. Based on the interpretivist perspective, this work draws on data from staff and student focus groups, semi structured interviews and surveys.\ud Team project clients were also asked to comment on their experiences and the way they would like team projects to be\ud improved in the future. Since issues affecting the success of team projects are quite closely inter-related, a systemic view is adopted rather than analysis of a single issue in isolation. Overall there is a feeling that multi-year team projects are a good idea in theory but can be challenging to implement in practice. It is argued that the main areas of concern are the assessment process, the dilemmas and tensions that it can introduce, and the related inconsistencies in stakeholder involvement, which can compromise the learning experience if not handled well. We believe that the assessment process holds the key to a successful learning experience in team project work.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baily, J., M. Sass, et al. (2005). "Teaching with and through teams: Student-written, instructor facilitated case writing and the signatory code." Journal of management education 29(1): 39-59.
    • Baskerville, R. and M. D. Myers (2004). "Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice - foreword." MIS Quarterly 28(3): 329 - 335.
    • Bate, P. (2001). Synthesizing Research and Practice: Using the Action Research Approach in Health Care settings. The business of research; issues and policy and practice. C. J. Finer and G. L. Hundt. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.: 478-493.
    • Beck, R. H. (1965). A social History of Education. London, Prentice Hall.
    • Boud, D. and N. Falchikov (1989). "Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings." Higher Education 18: 529-549.
    • Brooks, C. and J. Ammons (2003). "Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificy of criteria in peer assessments." Journal of Education for Business 78(5): 268-272.
    • Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods. London, Sage Publications.
    • Connerley, M. and F. Mael (2001). "The importance and the ivasiveness of student team selection criteria." Journal of management education 25(5): 471-494.
    • Cullen, J., K. Hadjivassiliou, et al. (2002). Review of current pedagogic research and practice in the fields of postcompulsory education and lifelong learning. London, The Tavistock Institute.
    • Forrester, J. (1994). "System Dynamics, Systems Thinking, and Soft OR." System Dynamics Review 10(2).
    • Gibbs, G. (1992). Assessing more students. Oxford, UK, Polytechniques and Colleges Funding Council.
    • Hult, M. and S. Lennung (1987). "Towards the Definition of Action Research: A Note and Bibliography." Journal of Management Studies 17(2): 241 - 250.
    • Humphreys, P., K. Greenan, et al. (1997). "Developing work based transferable skills in a university environment." Journal of European Industrial Training 21(2): 63-69.
    • Jones, M. C. and T. McMaster (2004). "Addressing Commercial Realism and Academic Issues In GroupBased IS Undergraduate Project Work." Journal of Information Systems Education 15(4): 375 - 381.
    • Lau, F. (1997). A Review on the Use of Action Research in Information Systems Studies. IFIP 8.2., London, Chapman & Hall.
    • Lynch, K., A. Heinze, et al. (2007). "Information technology team projects in higher education: An international viewpoint." Journal of Information Technology Education 6: 181-198.
    • Mumford, E. (Unknown). Enid Mumford Biography, http://www.enid.u-net.com/Biography.htm. 2007: Private website.
    • Mumford, E. and M. Weir (1979). Computer Systems Work Design: The ETHICS Method. London.
    • Perry, W., G., Jr. (1981). Cognitive and Ethical Growth: The Making of Meaning. The Modern American College. A. W. C. a. Associates, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 76 - 116.
    • Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Reprinted by Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1999.
    • Smith, H. H. and D. L. Smarkusky (2005). Competency Matrices for Peer Assessment of Individuals in Team Projects. Proceedings of the 6th conference on Information technology education, Newark, NJ, USA.
    • Thomas, S. and S. Busby (2003). "Do industry collaborative projects enhance students' learning?" Education + Training 45(4/5): 226-235.
    • Willcoxson, L. E. (2006). ""It's not fair!" Assessing the dynamics and resourcing of teamwork." Journal of management education 30(6): 798-808.
    • Wood-Harper, T. (1985). Research Methods in Information Systems: Using Action Research. Research Methods in Information Systems. E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, G. Fitzgerald and T. Wood-Harper. North-Holland: Amsterdam: 169-191.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article