Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Anstey, K.M.
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: RT
This thesis looks at the concept of involvement as it applies to older patients and their informal carers in the assessment of their own continuing care needs. In particular it is concerned with the nurse's role within the multidisciplinary team in facilitating the involvement of patients and informal carers in this process. The study was conducted in a district general hospital in London. Patient involvement in continuing care assessments was explored by following the care of 20 individual patients and their informal carers throughout their hospital stay, and after discharge in the community. Observations of key decision making activities in respect of these patients were contrasted with interviews with multidisciplinary staff who had been involved in their care, to provide insights into assessment practice. Interviews with patients and informal carers gave an indicator of how involved they felt in their own assessments. In addition, interviews with 32 multidisciplinary staff provided more general data on professionals' perceptions of their own roles with regard to involving patients in assessments. Analysis of the data revealed nurses were not being seen to be contributing to the assessment of patients' continuing care needs. Nurses' marginal position in continuing care assessments meant that it was particularly difficult for them to facilitate the involvement of patients and informal carers. What makes these findings all the more remarkable is the fact that nurses' continual presence on the ward was almost universally seen by the multidisciplinary team as offering them unrivalled opportunities to build a rapport with patients and thereby develop better understandings of their needs. Furthermore findings suggest that continuing care assessments and patient and informal carer involvement in this process may be affected by strategic and practice issues, as well as factors relating to patients and informal carers themselves. One explanation for these findings may be offered by Nolan et al.'s (2002) 'senses' framework. The application of the framework to the data suggests that a lack of attention to, 'the fundamentals of care' may affect professional practice. In particular, applying the framework to this multidisciplinary context suggests that a lack of these 'fundamentals of care' in one discipline may also affect the practice of other members of the multidisciplinary team. Moreover, the findings indicate that the framework may be incomplete and that it may require modification by the addition of a 'sense of expertise'. It is intended that generalizations may be made at a theoretical level from this case study.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 44 44 44 45 46 48 48 48 57 59 67 68 68 100 102 102 124 Abbott, S., Johnson, L. and Lewis, H. (2001) Participation in Arranging Continuing Health Care Packages: Experiences and aspirations of service users. Journal of Nursing Management 9: 79-85.
    • Abramson, J. (1988) Participation of Elderly Patients in Discharge Planning: Is SelfDetermination a Reality? Social Work 33: 443-448.
    • Agard, A., Hermeren, G. and Herlitz, J. (2000) Should cardiopulmonary resuscitation be performed on patients with heart failure? The role of the patient in the decision-making process. Journal of Internal Medicine 248: 4, 279-286.
    • Age Concern (1996) Not at my Age. London: Age Concern.
    • Allen, D. (1997) 'Sorry nurse I didn't want to tell you your job': Negotiating care in hospital wards. Paper presented at the British Sociological Association's annual Medical Sociology conference. York.
    • Allen, D., Lyne, P. and Griffiths, L. (2002) Studying complex caring interfaces: key issues arising from a study of multi-agency rehabilitative care for people who have suffered a stroke. Journal of Clinical Nursing 11: 3, 297-305.
    • Allen, I., Hogg, D. and Peace, S. (1992) Elderly People: Choice participation and satisfaction. London: Policy Studies Institute.
    • Altheide, D. and Johnson, J. (1994) Criteria for Assessing Interpretive Validity in Qualitative Research In: Denzin N. and Lincoln Y. (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
    • Armstrong, D. (1983) The Fabrication of Nurse-Patient Relationships. Social Science and Medicine 17: 8, 457-460.
    • Arnstein, S. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35: 4, 216-224.
    • Arora, N. and McHorney, C. (2000) Patient Preferences for Medical Decision Making: Who really wants to participate? Medical Care 38: 3, 335-341.
    • Ashworth, P., Longmate, M. and Morrison, P. (1992) Patient Participation: Its Meaning and Significance in the Context of Caring. Journal of Advanced Nursing 17: 1430-1439.
    • Audit Commission (1997) The Coming of Age: Improving care services for older people. London: Audit Commission.
    • Baldock, J. and Ungerson, C. (1994) Becoming Consumers of Community Care: Households within the mixed economy of welfare. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    • Baron, R. (1988) Negative Effects of Destructive Criticism: Impact on Conflict, Self-Efficacy, and Task Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 73: 2, 199-207.
    • Barnes, M. and Walker, A. (1996) Consumerism versus empowerment: a principled approach to the involvement of older service users. Policy and Politics 24: 4, 375-393.
    • Barnes, M. and Wistow, G. (1992) Researching User Involvement. Leeds: Nuffield Institute for Health Studies.
    • Basco, W. and Reigart, J. (2001) When do medical students identify career-influencing physician role models? Academic Medicine 76: 4, 380-382.
    • Beattie, A. (1991) Knowledge and Control in Health Promotion: A test case for social policy and social theory. In Gabe, J., Calnan, M. and Bury, M. (Eds) The Sociology of the Health Service. London: Routledge.
    • Beaver, K., Luker, K., Owens, R., Leinster, S., Degner, L. and Sloan, J. (1996) Treatment Decision-making in Women Newly Diagnosed with Breast Cancer. Cancer Nursing 19: 8-19.
    • Beisecker, A. and Beisecker, T. (1990) Patient Information-Seeking Behaviors when Communicating with Doctors. Medical Care 28: 19-28.
    • Beisecker, A., Helmig, L., Graham, D. and Moore, W. (1994) Attitudes of Oncologists, Oncology Nurses, and Patients from a Women's Clinic Regarding Medical Decision Making for Older and Younger Breast Cancer Patients. The Gerontologist 34: 4, 505- 512.
    • Beldcer, H., Thornton, J., Airey, C., Connelly, J., Hewison, J., Robinson, M., et al. (1999) Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 3 (1).
    • Bengston, V., Burgess, E. and Parrat, T. (1997) Theory, explanation and a third generation of theoretical development in social gerontology. Journal of Gerontology (Social Series) 52: 2, 572-88.
    • Black, D., Morris, J., Smith, C. and Townsend, P. (1982) Inequalities in Health: The Black Report. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    • Blanchard, C., Labrecque, M., Ruckdeschel, J. and Blanchard, E. (1988) Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Social Science and Medicine 27: 11, 1139-1145.
    • Caress, A., Luker, K. and Acicrill, P. (1998) Patient-sensitive Treatment Decision-making? Preferences and perceptions in a sample of renal patients. NT Research 3: 5, 364-372.
    • Caress, A., Luker, K., Woodcock, A. and Beaver, K. (2002) A qualitative exploration of treatment decision-making role preference in adult asthma patients. Health Expectations 5: 3, 223-325.
    • Carr-Hill, R. and Jenkins-Clarke S. (1995) The chimera of nursing workload management systems. Health Informatics 1: 22-25.
    • Cassileth, B., Zupkis, R., Sutton-Smith, K. and March, V. (1980) Information and Participation Preferences Among Cancer Patients. Annals of Internal Medicine 92: 832-836.
    • Chadderton, H. (1995) An analysis of the concept of participation within the context of health care planning. Journal of Nursing Management 3: 221-228.
    • Chang, B. (1980) Evaluation of health care professionals in facilitating self-care: review of the literature and a conceptual model. Advanced Nursing Science 3: 1, 43-58.
    • Clark, H., Dyer, S. and Hartman, L. (1996) Going Home: Older People leaving hospital. Bristol: Policy Press.
    • Davies, S., Nolan, M., Brown, J. and Wilson, F. (1999) Dignity on the Ward: Promoting Excellence in Care. London: Help the Aged.
    • Davies, S., Powell, A. and Aveyard, B. (2002) Developing Continuing Care: Towards a teaching nursing home. British Journal of Nursing 11: 20, 1320-1328.
    • Davies, S. and Nolan, M. (2003) A relationship-centred approach to working with older people and their families. In: Nursing Practice and Health Care. London: Arnold. (forthcoming).
    • Deber, R., Kraetschmer, N. and Irvine, J. (1996) What Role do Patients Wish in Treatment Decision Making? Archives of Internal Medicine 156: 1414-1420.
    • Degner, L. and Sloan, J. (1992) Decision Making During Serious Illness: What role do patients really want to play? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 45: 9, 941-950.
    • Dellasega, C. and Mastrian, K. (1995) The Process and Consequences of Institutionalizing an Elder. Western Journal of Nursing Research 17: 2, 123-40.
    • Department of Health (1989) Caring for People: Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond. [CM 849] London: HMSO.
    • Department of Health (2001a) National Service Framework for Older People. [LAC 2001/12, (HSC) 2001/007] London: Department of Health.
    • Fennell, G., Phillipson, C. and Evers, H. (1988) The Sociology of Old Age. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    • Ferrie, J., Shipley, M., Stansfeld, S. and Marmot M. (2002) Effects of chronic job insecurity and change in job security on self reported health, minor psychiatric morbidity, physiological measures, and health related behaviours in British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Journal of Epide,niology and Community Health 56: 6, 450-454.
    • Froland, C., Pancoast, D., Chapman, N. and Kimboko, P. (1981) Helping Networks and Human Services. London: Sage.
    • Gay, P. and Pitkeathley, J. (1979) When I Went Home ... a study of patients discharged from hospital. London: King Edward's Hospital Fund for London.
    • Gearing, B. and Dant, T. (1990) Doing Biographical Research. In: Peace (Ed) Researching Social Gerontology: concepts, methods and issues. London: Sage.
    • Gerteis, M., Edgman-Levitan, S., Daley, J. and Delbanco, T. (Eds) (1993) Through the Patient's Eyes. San Fancisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
    • Gilbert, H. (1995) Redressing the Balance: a brief survey of literature on patient empowerment. London: King's Fund.
    • Gilbert, N. (1993) Research, theory and method. In: Gilbert N. (Ed) Researching Social Life. London: Sage.
    • Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. (1998) Old people as users and consumers of healthcare: a third age rhetoric for a fourth age reality? Ageing and Society; 18: 235-248.
    • Godfrey, M. and Moore, J. (1996) Hospital Discharge: User, Carer and Professional Perspectives. Leeds: Nuffield Institute for Health.
    • House of Commons Health Committee (1996) Long-Term Care: Future Provision and Funding. Third Report, Session 1995-1996, HC 59-1, HMSO.
    • Kadushin, G. and Kulys, R. (1994) Patient and Family Involvement in Discharge Planning. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 22: 3/4, 171-199.
    • McCormack, B. and Wright, J. (1999) Achieving dignified care for older people through practice development: A systematic approach. NT Research 4: 5, 340-352.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article