LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Identifiers:doi:10.1111/hsc.12173
Reflective practice is used increasingly to enhance team functioning and service effectiveness; however, there is little evidence of its use in interdisciplinary teams. This paper presents the qualitative evaluation of the Interdisciplinary Management Tool (IMT), an evidence-based change tool designed to enhance interdisciplinary teamwork through structured team reflection. The IMT incorporates three components: an evidence-based resource guide; a reflective implementation framework based on Structured, Facilitated Action Research for Implementation methodology; and formative and summative evaluation components. The IMT was implemented with intermediate care teams supported by independent facilitators in England. Each intervention lasted 6 months and was evaluated over a 12-month period. Data sources include interviews, a focus group with facilitators, questionnaires completed by team members and documentary feedback from structured team reports. Data were analysed qualitatively using the Framework approach. The IMT was implemented with 10 teams, including 253 staff from more than 10 different disciplines. Team challenges included lack of clear vision; communication issues; limited career progression opportunities; inefficient resource use; need for role clarity and service development. The IMT successfully engaged staff in the change process, and resulted in teams developing creative strategies to address the issues identified. Participants valued dedicated time to focus on the processes of team functioning; however, some were uncomfortable with a focus on teamwork at the expense of delivering direct patient care. The IMT is a relatively low-cost, structured, reflective way to enhance team function. It empowers individuals to understand and value their own, and others' roles and responsibilities within the team; identify barriers to effective teamwork, and develop and implement appropriate solutions to these. To be successful, teams need protected time to take for reflection, and executive support to be able to broker changes that are beyond the scope of the team.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • GREENFIELD, D., NUGUS, P., TRAVAGLIA, J. & BRAITHWAITE, J. 2010. Auditing an organization's interprofessional learning and interprofessional practice: the interprofessional praxis audit framework (IPAF). Journal of interprofessional care, 24, 436-449.
    • GUMMESSON, D. 2000. Qualitative Methods in Management Research, Sage.
    • HARVEY, G., LOFTUS‐HILLS, A., RYCROFT‐MALONE, J., TITCHEN, A., KITSON, A., MCCORMACK, B. & SEERS, K. 2002. Getting evidence into practice: the role and function of facilitation. Journal of advanced nursing, 37, 577-588.
    • HENEGHAN, C., WRIGHT, J. & WATSON, G. 2013. Clinical Psychologists' Experiences of Reflective Staff Groups in Inpatient Psychiatric Settings: A Mixed Methods Study. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy.
    • KATZENBACH, J. R. & SMITH, D. K. 1992. The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization, Harvard Business Press.
    • KNOX, G. E. & SIMPSON, K. R. 2004. Teamwork: the fundamental building block of high-reliability organizations and patient safety. Patient Safety Handbook, 379-414.
    • LAFASTO, F. & LARSON, C. 2001. When teams work best: 6,000 team members and leaders tell what it takes to succeed, Sage.
    • LEARMONTH, M. 2005. Doing things with words: the case of 'management'and 'administration'. Public Administration, 83, 617-637.
    • LEATHARD, A. 2003. Interprofessional Collaboration: From Policy to Practice in Health and Social Care, London, Brunner-Routledge.
    • NANCARROW, S. 2004. Dynamic role boundaries in intermediate care services. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18, 141-151.
    • NANCARROW, S., ENDERBY, P., ARISS, S., SMITH, T., BOOTH, A., CAMPBELL, M., CANTRELL, A. & PARKER, S. 2012. The impact of enhancing the effectiveness of interdisciplinary working. Section 1.
    • NANCARROW, S., MORAN, A., ENDERBY, P., PARKER, S. G., DIXON, S., MITCHELL, C., BRADBURN, M., MCCLIMENS, A., GIBSON, C., JOHN, A., BORTHWICK, A. & BUCHAN, J. 2010. The relationship between workforce flexibility and the costs and outcomes of older peoples services. London: National Institute of Health Research.
    • NANCARROW, S. A., BOOTH, A., ARISS, S., SMITH, T., ENDERBY, P. & ROOTS, A. 2013. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Human resources for health, 11, 19.
    • RITCHIE, J. & SPENCER, L. 1995. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: BRYMAN, A. & BURGESS, R. G. (eds.) Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge.
    • SALAS, E., SIMS, D. E. & BURKE, C. S. 2005. Is there a “big five” in teamwork? Small group research, 36, 555-599.
    • SCHIPPERS, M. C., HOMAN, A. C. & KNIPPENBERG, D. 2013. To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 6-23.
    • SMITH, T., CROSS, E., BOOTH, A., ARISS, S., NANCARROW, S., ENDERBY, P. M. & BLINSTON, A. 2012. Interdisciplinary Management Tool - Workbook Southampton, National Institute of Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation Program.
    • STANIFORTH, D. & WEST, M. 1995. Leading and managing teams. Team Performance Management, 1, 28-33.
    • SVEEN, E., BAUTZ-HOLTER, K., MARGRETHE, S., TORGEIR, B. W. & KNUT LAAKE, U. 1999. Association between impairments, self-care ability and social activities 1 year after stroke. Disability & Rehabilitation, 21, 372-377.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article