LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: University of Nottingham
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects:
The opposition of uiut (the meaning of which is only partially rendered by the English ‘cosiness’) and chaos is identified as a fundamental structural element in Mikhail Bulgakov’s Belaia gvardiia, informing the novel’s construction on a variety of formal and thematic levels. This duality is not so much an objective feature of Bulgakov’s fictional world as an attribute of the fictional consciousnesses through which it is portrayed (those of the Turbin family and their sympathetic narrator). Thus, there are numerous instances of ironic authorial subversions of the uiut/chaos opposition: this is most evident in the case of the novel’s explicit intertexts, the classic works of Russian literature that are for the Turbins the supreme manifestation of the culture of uiut. Yet their wish (ironically fulfilled) to live the life portrayed in these “chocolate books,” from Pushkin’s Kapitanskaia dochka to Bunin’s “Gospodin iz San-Frantsisko,” ignores the focus of these works on chaos and the destruction of uiut. In his use of the literary tradition to convey the fragility/durability of uiut at a time of cultural crisis, Bulgakov echoes the writing of many of his contemporaries. In Pil’njak, Zamjatin, Pasternak and others, one finds notable examples of a similar leitmotif technique (e.g., the stove as a locus of both chaos and uiut) and symbolism (e.g., the house as a microcosm of Russian culture). The subtlety with which Bulgakov juxtaposes the poles of the chaos/uiut opposition through his choice of setting, narrative structure, symbols and leitmotifs proves that Belaia gvardiia is no beginner’s effort, as it has sometimes been regarded, but that it deserves the sort of detailed analysis that would remedy the double eclipse it has historically suffered within Bulgakov’s oeuvre from Master i Margarita and Dni Turbinykh.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 4Max Hayward, “Russian Literature in the Soviet Period, 1917-1973,” in his Writers in Russia: 1917- 1975 (San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1983), 77-8. (This essay was originally published in 1977.) 5Barratt 105. Barbara Kejna Sharratt makes a similar argument: “In Defense of Bulgakov‟s Belaja gvardija, Russian Language Journal 36 (1982, nos. 123-124).
    • 6 Violetta Gudkova, “Kogda otshumeli spory: Bulgakovedenie poslednego desiatiletiia,” Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (2008, no. 91). http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2008/91/gu33.html [Accessed 26 Jan. 2012.]
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article