LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: LA

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
This paper provides a critical perspective on the attempts to promote the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in teaching and learning in England. It describes the rationale given for the introduction of ICT in terms of its potential to impact on educational standards to contribute to developing a curriculum which has more vocational/social significance and, more generally, to provide a catalyst for curriculum reform. The introduction of ICT is underpinned by the argument that schools should show a higher degree of correspondence with a wider world where the use of technology is pervasive. However, the claims made for ICT display excessive optimism and a sense of “inevitability.” ICT has had only a modest impact on schools, though impact has to be considered in the context of what can realistically be expected: the contribution of ICT has not been negligible. Future development in the use of ICT should be more measured and adaptive, taking account of the multidimensional nature of technology.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agalianos, A., Noss, R., & Whitty, G. (2001). Logo in Mainstream Schools: The struggle over the soul of an educational innovation. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(4), 479-500.
    • Alexander, E. (2010). A successful child: early years practitioners' understandings of quality. Early Years, 30(2), 107-118.
    • Andrews, R., Dan, H., Freeman, A., McGuinn, N., Robinson, A., & Zhu, D. (2005). The effectiveness of different ICTs in the teaching and learning of English (written composition), 5-16. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
    • Ball, S. (1990). Politics and Policy in Education. London: Routledge.
    • Bassey, M. (2001). A Solution to the Problem of Generalisation in Educational Research: Fuzzy prediction. Oxford Review of Education, 27(1), 5-22.
    • Bijker, W. (1997). Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.
    • Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond Technology: Children's learning in the age of digital culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    • Cartwright, V., & Hammond, M. (2007). 'Fitting it in': a study exploring ICT use in a UK primary school. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 390-407.
    • Chapman, J. (2002). Systems Failure: Why Government Must Learn to Think Differently. London: Demos.
    • Condie, R., Munro, B., Seagraves, L., & Kenesson, S. (2007). The Impact of ICT in Schools- a landscape review. Coventry: Becta.
    • Conlon, T. (2004). A Failure of Delivery: the United Kingdom's New Opportunities Fund programme of teacher training in information and communications technology. Journal of In-Service Education, 30(1), 115-140.
    • Convery, A., Mavers, D., Lewin, C., & Somekh, B. (2006). ICT Test Bed Action Research Reports Cross-Case Analysis, December 2006. Manchester: ICT Test Bed.
    • Cox, M., Abbott, C., Webb, M., Blakeley, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2003). A review of the research literature relating to ICT and attainment. Coventry: Becta.
    • Cox, M., & Marshall, G. (2007). Effects of ICT: Do we know what we should know? Education and Information Technologies, 12(2), 59-70.
    • Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
    • Department for Education and Employment. (1997). Connecting the Learning Society: National Grid for Learning, The Government's consultation paper. London: DfEE.
    • Department for Education and Skills. (2005). Fulfilling the Potential: Transforming teaching and learning through ICT in schools. London: DfES.
    • Desjardins, R. (2008). Researching the links between education and well-being. European Journal of Education, 43(1), 23-35.
    • DfES. (2005). Harnessing Technology Transforming Learning and Children's Services. London: DfES.
    • Dillon, P. (2004). Trajectories and tensions in the theory of information and communication technology in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(2), 12.
    • Drenoyianni, H., & Selwood, I. D. (1998). Conceptions or misconceptions? Primary teachers' perceptions and use of computers in the classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 3(2), 87-99.
    • Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E., et al. (2006). The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Pupil Learning and Attainment. Coventry: Becta.
    • Hawkridge, D. (1990). Who needs computers in schools, and why? Computers & Education, 15(1- 3), 1-6.
    • Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192.
    • Higgins, S. (2003). Does ICT Improve Learning and Teaching in Schools? A professional user review of UK research undertaken for the British Educational Research Association. Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
    • Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213-225.
    • Higgins, S., & Moseley, D. (2001). Teachers' thinking about information and communications technology and learning: beliefs and outcomes. Teacher Development, 5(2), 191-210.
    • Hodkinson, P. (1991). Liberal Education and the New Vocationalism: a progressive partnership? Oxford Review of Education, 17(1), 73 - 88.
    • Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2003). Individuals, Communities of Practice and the Policy Context: School teachers' learning in their workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 25(1), 3-21.
    • Holmes, B., Gardner, J., & Galanouli, D. (2007). Striking the right chord and sustaining successful professional development in information and communications technologies. Journal of In-Service Education, 33(4), 389-404.
    • Infogroup/ORCInternational. (2010). Harnessing Technology School Survey: 2010. Coventry: Becta.
    • Jephcote, M., & Abbott, I. (2005). Tinkering and tailoring: the reform of 14-19 education in England. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 57(2), 181-202.
    • Jewitt, C., Hadjithoma-Garstka, C., Clark, W., Banaji, S., & Selwyn, S. (2010). School Use of Learning Platforms and Associated Technologies. Coventry: Becta.
    • John, P. (2005). The sacred and the profane: subject sub-culture, pedagogical practice and teachers' perceptions of the classroom uses of ICT. Educational Review, 57(4), 471 - 490.
    • Kennewell, S. (2004). Meeting the Standards in Using ICT for Secondary Teaching: A Guide to the ITT NC. London: Routledge.
    • Kent, N., & Facer, K. (2004). Different worlds? A comparison of young people's home and school ICT use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 440-455.
    • Latour, B. (2002). Morality and technology, the end of the means. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(5/6), 247 -260 (translated by Couze Venn).
    • Lewin, C., Mavers, D., & Somekh, B. (2003). Broadening access to the curriculum through using technology to link home and school: a critical analysis of reforms intended to improve students' educational attainment. Curriculum Journal, 14(1), 23-53.
    • Livingstone, D. (1995). Searching for the missing links: neo Marxist theories of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16(1), 53-73.
    • Looi, C. K. (2001). Regional editorial: IT programmes and policies in the Asia-Pacific region. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 1-3.
    • Marsh, J., Brooks, G., Hughes, J., Ritchie, L., Roberts, S., & Wright, K. (2005). Report of the 'Young Children's Use of Popular Culture, Media and New Technologies' Study, funded by BBC Worldwide and the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation. Sheffield: Literacy Research Centre, University of Sheffield.
    • Mastrangelo, J.-G., & Loncarevic, M. E. (2004). UNESCO's Basic Texts on the Information Society. Paris: UNESCO.
    • McKinsey and Company. (1997). The Future of Information Technology in UK Schools. London: McKinsey and Company.
    • Miliband, D. (2004). Personalised Learning: Building a New Relationship with Schools. London: DfES.
    • Moran-Ellis, J., & Cooper, G. (2000). Making connections: children, technology and the national grid for learning. Sociological Research Online 5(3). Published at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/3/moran-ellis.html.
    • Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levaaic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A., & Castle, F. (2007). The Interactive Whiteboard, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance Evaluation: An evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) Project London Challenge. London: Institute of Education, University of London/DfES.
    • Mumtaz, S., & Hammond, M. (2002). The word processor re-visited: observations on the use of the word processor to develop literacy at key stage 2. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 345-347.
    • Ofsted. (2004). ICT in Schools 2004: the impact of government initiatives five years on. London: Ofsted.
    • Ofsted. (2011). ICT in Schools 2008-11, An evaluation of information and communication technology education in schools in England 2008-11. London: Ofsted.
    • Olson, J. (1988). Schoolworlds/Microworlds: Computers and the culture of the school. Oxford: Pergamon.
    • Olson, J. (2005). Information technology in schools: Should the product be marked hazardous? "Seminar.net": International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 1(2). Published at http://seminar.net/index.php/volume-1-issue-2-2005-previousissuesmeny-2109/2040- information-technology-in-schools-should-the-product-be-marked-hazardous.
    • Passey, D., Rogers, C., Machell, J., & McHugh, G. (2004). The Motivational Effect of ICT on Pupils. Lancaster: Lancaster University Department of Educational Research.
    • Perry, A., Amadeo, C., Fletcher, M., & Walker, E. (2010). Instinct or Reason: How education policy is made and how we might make it better. Reading: LSN and CfBT.
    • Peters, M. (2001). National education policy constructions of the knowledge economy towards a critique. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(1), 1-21.
    • Plomp, T., Anderson, R., & Law, N. (2009). Cross-National Information and Communication Technology Policies and Practices in Education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    • Reynolds, D., Treharne, D., & Tripp, H. (2003). ICT-the hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 151-167.
    • Robins, K., & Webster, F. (1999). Times of the Technoculture. London: Routledge.
    • Rushby, N., & Seabrook, J. (2008). Understanding the past - illuminating the future. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(2), 198-233.
    • Scrimshaw, P. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. Coventry: Becta.
    • Selwyn, N. (1999). Why the Computer is not dominating schools: a failure of policy or a failure of practice? Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(1), 77 - 91.
    • Selwyn, N. (2008). Realising the potential of new technology? Assessing the legacy of New Labour's ICT agenda 1997-2007. Oxford Review of Education, 34(6), 701-712.
    • Selwyn, N. (2011). Editorial: In praise of pessimism-the need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 713-718.
    • Selwyn, N., & Gorard, S. (2003). Reality bytes: examining the rhetoric of widening educational participation via ICT. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(2), 169-181.
    • Selwyn, N., Potter, J., & Cranmer, S. (2010). Primary schools and ICT: Learning from learner perspectives. London: Continuum.
    • Stevenson, D. (1997). Information and Communication Technology: an independent inquiry. London: Independent ICT in Schools Commission.
    • Tearle, P. (2003). ICT implementation: what makes the difference? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 567-583.
    • Twining, P. (2002). ICT in Schools: Estimating the level of investment. MEeD8. Published at www.meD8.info/docs/meD8_02-01.pdf:.
    • Twining, P., Broadie, R., Cook, D., Ford, K., Morris, D., Twiner, A., et al. (2006). Educational Change and ICT: an exploration of priorities 2 & 3 of the DfES eStrategy in schools and colleges. Coventry: Becta.
    • Underwood, J. (2009). The Impact of Digital Technology: a review of the evidence of the impact of digital technologies on formal education. Coventry: Becta.
    • Underwood, J., Baguley, T., Banyard, P., Dillon, G., Farrington-Flint, L., et al. (2009). Personalising Learning. Coventry: Becta.
    • Valentine, G., Marsh, J., & Pattie, C. (2005). Children and Young People's Home Use of ICT for Educational Purposes: The Impact on Attainment at Key Stages 1-4. London: Department for Education and Skills.
    • Watson, D. [Ed] (1993). The ImpacT Report - An evaluation of the impact of Information technology on children's achievements in primary and secondary schools. London: Kings College.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article