LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HM

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: humanities, social sciences, behavior and behavior mechanisms
Many hail wives’ part-time employment as a work—family balance strategy, but theories offer competing predictions as to the effects of wives’ employment on relationship stability. We use panel data to test these competing hypotheses among recent cohorts of first-married couples in Great Britain, West Germany 1 and the United States. We find effects of wives’ employment on marital stability var y across the countries. In West Germany with its high-quality part-time employment, couples where the wife works part time are significantly more stable. In the more liberal British and US labour markets, neither wives’ part- nor full-time employment significantly alters divorce risk. In the United States, however, mothers working part time have significantly lower divorce risk. West German and British husbands’ unemployment proves more detrimental to marital stability than wives’ employment. These results highlight the importance of the socioeconomic context in structuring the optimal employment participation of both partners.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Allison, P. D. 1984. Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Analysis, Sage University Paper series in Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 07-046, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Bardasi, E. and J. C. Gornick. 2008. Working for Less? Woes Pat -time Wage Penalties Aoss Couties. Feminist Economics 14: 37 - 72.
    • Becker, G. S. . Hua Capital, Effot, ad the “eual Diisio of Lao. Journal of Labor Economics 3, Part 2: S33-S58.
    • Becker, G. S., E. M. Landes and R. T. Michael. 1977. An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability. The Journal of Political Economy 85: 1141-88.
    • Beveridge, W. 1942. Social Insurance and Allied Service. London: HMSO.
    • Blossfeld, H. P. and C. Hakim. 1997. Between Equalization and Marginalization: Women Working Part-Time in Europe and the United States of America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Blossfeld, H.P., M. Mills and F. Bernardi. (eds). 2006. Gloalizatio, Uetait ad Mes Careers: An International Comparison. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Böheim, R. and Ermisch, J. 2001. Partnership Dissolution in the UK: The Role of Economic Circumstances. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 63: 197-208.
    • Chan, T. W. and B. Halpin. 2002. Union Dissolution in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Sociology 32: 76-93.
    • Cherlin, A. 1992. Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Conger, R. D., G. H. Elder, Jr., F. O. Lorenz, K. J. Conger, R. L. Simons, L. B. Whitbeck, S. M. Huck and J. N. Mel. . Likig Economic Hardship to Marital Quality and Istailit. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52: 643-656
    • Cooll, “. ad M. Gego. . Moig Do: Wo e's Pat -Time Work and Occupational Change in Britain 1991-. Economic Journal. 118(526): F52-F76, 02.
    • Cooke, L. P. ad J. Bate. Fothoig. Failies i Iteatioal Pespetie: Copaig Istitutioal Effets Aoss Weste “oieties. Journal of Marriage and Family 2010 Decade Review.
    • Cooke, L. P. 2007. Pesistet Policy Effects on Gender Equity in the Home: The Division of Doesti Tasks i 'euified Gea. Journal of Marriage and Family 69: 930-950.
    • Cooke, L. P. 2006. Doig Gede i Cotet: Household Bagaiig ad t he 'isk of Dioe in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology 112: 442-72.
    • Crompton, R. 2002. Employment, Flexible Working and the Family. British Journal of Sociology 53: 537-58.
    • Crompton, R. and E. Harris. 1998. Eplaiig Woes Eploet Pattes: Oietatio s to Wok 'eisited . British Journal of Sociology 49: 118-36.
    • Cummins, R. A. 1996. The Domains of Life Satisfaction: An Attempt to Order Chaos. Social Indicators Research 38: 303-28.
    • Dal, M. ad '. Valletta. . Ieualit ad Poet i Uited “tates : The Effects of Rising Dispesio of Me's Eaigs ad Chagig Fail Behai ou. Economica 73: 289, 75- 98.
    • Dex, S. and L. B. Shaw. 1986. British and American Women at Work: Do Equal Opportunity Policies Matter? London: Macmillan Press.
    • Drobnič, S., H-P. Blossfeld and G. Rohwer. 1999. Dais of Woes Eploet Patterns over the Family Life Course: A Comparison of the United States and Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family 61: 133-46.
    • Eurydice. 2009. Early Childhood Education and Care in Europe: Tackling Social and Cultural Inequalities. Brussels: European Commission.
    • Fagan, C. and P. Walthery. . The 'ole ad Effetieess of Tie Poliies fo 'eoiliatio of Cae 'esposiilities. Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs Working Paper DELSA/ELSA/WP1(2007). Paris: OECD.
    • Fischer, T. and A. C. Liefbroer. 2006. For Richer, For Poorer: The Impact of Macroeconomic Conditions on Union Dissolution Eates in the Netherlands 1972 - 1996. European Sociological Review 22: 519 - 532.
    • Fisher, H. 1993. Anatomie de liebe [Anatomy of Love]. Munich: Droemer Knaur.
    • Fraser, N. 1994. Afte the Fail Wage: Gede Euit ad the Welfae “tate. Political Theory 22: 591-618.
    • Frevert, U. 1989. Women in German History: From Bourgeois Emancipation to Sexual Liberation. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
    • Gash, V., A. Mertens and L. Romeu-Gordo. 2007. Ae Fied -Term Jobs Bad for your Health? A Copaiso of “pai ad Gea. European Societies 9: 429-458.
    • Gash, V. 2008. Costaits o Pefee nces? Identifying Answers from Part-tie Wokes Transitions in Denmark, France and the United Kingdom. Work, Employment and Society, 22: 655-674.
    • Goode, W. J. 1970. World Revolution and Family Patterns. New York: The Free Press.
    • Gornick, J. C. and M. K. Meyers. 2003. Families that Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment. New York: Russell Sage.
    • Greenhaus, J.H. and G. N. Powell. 2006. When Work and Family are Allies: a Theory of Work-Family Enrichment. Academy of Management Review 1: 72-92.
    • Gregg, P., M. Gutierrez-Doeeh ad J. Waldfogel. . The Eploet of Maied Mothers in Great Britain, 1974-. Economica 74: 842 - 864.
    • Hakim, C. 2000. Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    • Ha, W. J., C. J. 'uh, J. Waldfogel ad E. Washook. . The Tiig of Mothes Eploet afte Childith. Monthly Labor Review 131: 15 - 27.
    • Hansen, H-T. . Ueploet ad Maital Dissolutio: A Pae l Data “tud of Noa. European Sociological Review 21: 135 - 148.
    • Härkönen, J. and J. Dronkers. 2006. Stability and Change in the Educational Gradient of Dioe. A Copaiso of “eetee Couties. European Sociological Review 22: 501 - 518.
    • Henz, U., and J. O. Jonsson. 2003. Union Disruption in Sweden. International Journal of Sociology 33: 3 - 39.
    • Hoffman, S. D. and G. J. Duncan. 1995. The Effect of Incomes, Wages, and AFDC Benefits on Marital Disruptions. Journal of Human Resources 30: 19-41.
    • Jacobs, J. A. and K. Gerson. 2004. The Time Divide: Work, Family, and Gender Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Jacobs, J. A. and J. C. Gornick. 2002. Hours of Paid Work in Dual-earner Couples: the United States in Cross-national Perspective. Sociological Focus 35: 169 - 187.
    • Jaumotte, F. 2003 Female Labour Force Participation: Past Trends and Main Determinants in OECD Countries. Economics Working Paper ECO/WKP 30, Paris: OECD.
    • Jaloaaa, M. . The Joit Effets of Maiage Pat es “oioeooi P ositions on the 'isk of Dioe. Demography 40: 67 - 81.
    • Jaloaaa, M. . “oio -economic Status and Divorce in First Marriages in Finland 1991- . Population Studies 55: 19 - 133.
    • Johnson, D. and A. Booth. 1998. Is Marital Quality a Product of the Dyadic Environment or Individual Factors? Panel Evidence from Individuals in Successive Marriages. Social Forces 76: 883-904.
    • Joshi, H., P. Pai ad J. Waldfogel. The ages of othe hood: ette o ose?, Cambridge Journal of Economics. 23:543-564.
    • Kalleberg, A., B. F. Reskin and K. Hudson. 2000. Bad Jobs in America: Standard and Nonstandard Employment Relations and Job Quality in the United States. American Sociological Review 65: 256-78.
    • Kamerman, S. B., M. Neuman, J. Waldfogel and J. Brooks-Gu. . “oial Poliies, Fail Tpes ad Child Outoes i “eleted OECD Cou ties. “oial, Eploet ad Migration Working Paper #6. Paris: OECD.
    • Liefbroer, A. C. and E. Dourleijn, E. 2006. Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography, 43, 203 - 221.
    • Lipset, S. M. 1990. Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.
    • Lgstad, T. H. . Wh Do Couples ith Hig hly Educated Parents Have Higher Divorce 'ates? European Sociological Review 22: 49 - 60.
    • MGiit, F. ad P. MMaus. . Paig the pie fo eoilig ok ad fail life: Comparing the wage penalty for women's part-time work in Britain, Germany and the Uited “tates. Journal Of Comparative Policy Analysis. 9: 115-134.
    • McKnight, A., P. Elias and R. Wilson. 1998. Low Pay and the National Insurance System: A Statistical Picture. Equal Opportunities Commission, Research Discussion Series, July 1998.
    • McRae, S. 2003. Costaits ad Choies i Mothes Eploet Caee s: A Cosideatio of Hakis Pefeee Theo . British Journal of Sociology 54: 317-38.
    • Machin, S. 1996. "Wage inequality in the UK." Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12(1): 47- 64.
    • OECD 2007. Family Data Base, http://www.oecd.org/els/social/family/database. Accessed 11 September 2008.
    • OECD 2002. Employment Outlook, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
    • O'Connell, P. and V. Gash. 2003. The Effects of Working-time, Segmentation and Labour Market Mobility on Wages and Pensions in Ireland. British Journal of Industrial Relations 41: 71-95.
    • Oppeheie, V. K. . Woes Eploet ad th e Gai to Marriage: The “peializatio ad Tadig Model. Annual Review of Sociology 23: 431-453.
    • Ostner, I. 1992. Ideas, Institutions, Traditions: The Experience of West German Women, 1945-1990. German Politics and Society 24 and 25: 87-99.
    • Palie, B. ad K. Thele. . Istitutioalizig Dualis: Copleetaities ad Chage i France ad Gea. Pape peseted at the aual eetig o f the “oiet fo the Advancement of Socio-Economics, Paris, 18 - 19 July 2009.
    • Pascall, G. 1997. Social Policy: A New Feminist Analysis. London: Routledge.
    • Plantenga, J. and C. Remery. 2006. Reconciliation of Work and Private Life: A Comparative Review of Thirty European Countries. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. Brussels: The European Commission.
    • Previti, D. and P. '. Aato. . Wh “ta Maied? 'eads , Barriers, and Marital Istailit. Journal of Marriage and Family 65: 561-572
    • 'uggles, “tee. . The 'ise of Dioe ad “epaat io i the Uited “tates, -. Demography 34: 455-466.
    • Sigle-'ushto, W. ad J. Waldfogel. . Mothehood ad Women's Earnings in AngloAeia, Cotietal Euopea, ad Nodi Couties. Feminist Economics 13: 55 - 91.
    • Skocpol, T. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Töns, K. and B. Youg. . The Case of Gea. Pp. -156 in Ute Behning and Amparo Serrano Pascual (Eds.), Gender Mainstreaming in the European Employment Strategy. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
    • Trappe, H. 2000. Wok ad Fail i Woes Lies i the Gea Deo ati 'epuli . In T. L. Parcel and D. B. Cornfield (eds), Work and Family: Research Informing Policy, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    • von Oertzen, C. 1999. Women, Work and the State: Lobbying for Part-Time Work and Patial Eualit i the West Gea Ciil “e vice 1958-1969. In R. Torstendahl (ed.), State Policy and Gender System in the Two German States and Sweden 1945- 1989, Lund, Sweden: Bloms i Lund Tryckeri AB.
    • Voyandoff, P. . Toad a Coeptualizatio of Pee ived Work-Family Fit and Balance: A Demads ad 'esoues Appoah. Journal of Marriage and the Family 67: 822-836.
    • Wal, “. . The Case of the Uited Kigdo. Pp. -250 in Ute Behning and Amparo Serrano Pascual (Eds), Gender Mainstreaming in the European Employment Stragegy. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
    • Walters, S. 2005. Making the Best of a Bad Job? Female Part-Ties Oietatios ad Attitudes Toward Work. Gender, Work and Organization 12: 193-216.
    • Wage, “. . Eeastätigkeit, Aeitszeit ud A eitsolue nach Geschlecht und Altesguppe. Working Paper 2/2006. Nuremberg: Instituts für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung.
    • Warren, T. 2004. Working Part-tie: Ahieig a “uessful Wok -Life Balae? British Journal of Sociology 55: 99-122.
    • Western, B., D. Bloome and C. Percheski. 2008. Inequality among American Families with Children, 1975 to 2005. American Sociological Review. 73: 903 - 920.
    • White, M., S. Hill, P. McGovern, C. Mills and D. Smeaton. 2003. High Pefoae Management Practices, Working Hours and Work-life Balance. British Journal of Industrial Relations 41: 175-195.
    • Yamaguchi, K. 1991. Event History Analysis (Applied Social Research Methods Series Volume 28). London: Sage Publications.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article