Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RE

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: parasitic diseases, fluids and secretions, body regions, education
Does human vision show the contrast invariance expected of an ideal stereoscopic system for computing depth from disparity? We used random-dot stereograms to investigate the luminance contrast effect on perceived depth from disparity. The perceived depth of disparity corrugations was measured by adjusting the length of a horizontal line to match the perceived depth of the corrugations at various luminance contrasts. At each contrast, the perceived depth increased with disparity up to a critical value, decreasing with further increases in disparity. Both the maximum perceived depth and the disparity modulation level where this maximum occurred changed as a sigmoid function of luminance contrast. These results show that perceived depth from disparity depends in a complex manner on the luminance contrast in the image, providing significant limitations on depth perception at low contrasts in a lawful manner but that are incompatible with existing models of cortical disparity processing.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Backus, B. T., Fleet, D. J., Parker, A. J., & Heeger, D. J. (2001). Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2054-2068.
    • Bevington, P. R., & Robinson, D. K. (2003). Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
    • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
    • Chen, C. C., & Tyler, C. W. (2001). Lateral sensitivity modulation explains the flanker effect in contrast discrimination. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/ The Royal Society, 268, 509-516.
    • Cormack, R., & Fox, R. (1985). The computation of retinal disparity. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 176-178.
    • Cormack, L. K., Stevenson, S. B., & Schor, C. M. (1991). Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing. Vision Research, 31, 2195-2207.
    • Da Vinci, L. (1802). Treatise on painting [J. S. Hawkins, Trans.]. London: J. Taylor.
    • Fleet, D. J., Wagner, H., & Heeger, D. J. (1996). Neural encoding of binocular disparity: Energy models, position shifts and phase shifts. Vision Research, 36, 1839-1857.
    • Fry, G. A., Bridgman, C. S., & Ellerbrock, V. J. (1949). The effects of atmospheric scattering on binocular depth perception. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 26, 9-15.
    • Green, D. M., & Swets, J.A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
    • Halpern, D. L., & Blake, R. R. (1988). How contrast affects stereoacuity. Perception, 17, 483-495.
    • Heckmann, T., & Schor, C. M. (1989). Is edge information for stereoacuity spatially channeled? Vision Research, 29, 593-607.
    • Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What's new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36, 14.
    • Kontsevich, L., & Tyler, C. (1999). Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold. Vision Research, 39, 2729-2737.
    • Legge, G. E., & Gu, Y. C. (1989). Stereopsis and contrast. Vision Research, 29, 989-1004.
    • Lit, A., Finn, J. P., & Vicars, W. M. (1972). Effect of target-background luminance contrast on binocular depth discrimination at photopic levels of illumination. Vision Research, 12, 1241-1251.
    • Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co.
    • Ogle, K. N., & Weil, M. P. (1958). Stereoscopic vision and the duration of the stimulus. A.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmology, 59, 4-17.
    • Ohzawa, I. (1998). Mechanisms of stereoscopic vision: the disparity energy model. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 509-515.
    • Ohzawa, I., DeAngelis, G. C., & Freeman, R. D. (1990). Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: Neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science, 249, 1037-1041.
    • Poggio, G. F., Motter, B. C., Squatrito, S., & Trotter, Y. (1985). Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms. Vision Research, 25, 397- 406.
    • Qian, N. (1997). Binocular disparity and the perception of depth. Neuron, 18, 359-368.
    • Qian, N., & Zhu, Y. (1997). Physiological computation of binocular disparity. Vision Research, 37, 1811-1827.
    • Read, J. C., Parker, A. J., & Cumming, B. G. (2002). A simple model accounts for the response of disparity-tuned V1 neurons to anticorrelated images.
    • Vision Neuroscience, 19, 735-753.
    • Rohaly, A. M., & Wilson, H. R. (1994). Disparity averaging across spatial scales. Vision Research, 34, 1315-1325.
    • Rohaly, A. M., & Wilson, H. R. (1999). The effects of contrast on perceived depth and depth discrimination. Vision Research, 39, 9-18.
    • Schor, C. M., & Howarth, P. A. (1986). Suprathreshold stereo-depth matches as a function of contrast and spatial frequency. Perception, 15, 249-258.
    • Tyler, C. W. (1974). Depth perception in disparity gratings. Nature, 251, 140-142.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article