LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: The American Physiological Society
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Imagined movements are thought to simulate physical ones, with similar behavioral constraints and neurophysiological activation patterns and with an inhibition mechanism that suppresses movement execution. When upper body movements such as reaching with the arm are made from an upright stance, lower body and trunk muscles are also activated to maintain body posture. It is not clear to what extent parameters of imagined manual movements are sensitive to the postural adjustments their execution would necessitate, nor whether such postural responses are as effectively inhibited as the imagined movements themselves. We asked healthy young participants to imagine reaching movements of the arm while in upright stance, and we measured their self-reported movement times and postural sway during imagined movements. We manipulated mediolateral stance stability and the direction of arm movement (mediolateral or anteroposterior). Imagined arm movements were reportedly slower when subjects were standing in a mediolaterally less stable stance, and the body swayed more when arm movements were imagined in the direction of postural vulnerability. The results suggest that the postural state of the whole body, not just the involved limbs, informs trajectory planning during motor imagery and that measurable adjustments to body posture accompany imagined manual actions. It has been suggested that movement is suppressed during motor imagery by a premotor inhibitory mechanism operating at brain stem or spinal level. Any such inhibition must be incomplete because, for example, it does not eliminate autonomic arousal. Our results suggest that it also does not effectively suppress postural adjustments planned in support of imagined movements.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bardy BG, Marin L, Stoffregen TA, Bootsma RJ. Postural coordination modes considered as emergent phenomena. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25: 1284 -1301, 1999.
    • Bonnet M, Decety J, Jeannerod M, Requin J. Mental simulation of an action modulates the excitability of spinal reflex pathways in man. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 5: 221-228, 1997.
    • Calabrese P, Messonnier L, Bijaoui E, Ebherhard A, Benchetrit G. Cardioventilatory changes induced by mentally imaged rowing. Eur J Appl Physiol 91: 160 -166, 2003.
    • Cerritelli B, Maruff P, Wilson P, Currie J. The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 18: 91-96, 2000.
    • Clark S, Tremblay F, Ste-Marie D. Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation, mental imagery and imitation of hand actions. Neuropsychologia 42: 993-996, 2004.
    • Collet C, Guillot A. Peripheral responses elicited by motor imagery: a window on central and peripheral nervous system relationships related to motor inhibition. In: Cognitive Psychology Research Developments, edited by Weingarten SP, Penat HO. Hauppauge, NY: Nova, 2009, p. 245-259.
    • Collet C, Di Rienzo F, El Hoyek N, Guillot A. Autonomic nervous system correlated in movement observation and motor imagery. Front Hum Neurosci 7: 415, 2013.
    • Davidson PR, Wolpert DM. Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review. J Neural Eng 2: S313-S319, 2005.
    • Decety J, Jeannerod M. Fitts' law in mentally simulated movements. Behav Brain Res 72: 127-134, 1996.
    • Decety J, Jeannerod M, Durozard D, Baverel G. Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions in man. J Physiol 461: 549 - 63, 1993.
    • Decety J, Jeannerod M, Prablanc C. The timing of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 34: 35- 42, 1989.
    • De Lange FP, Hagoort P, Toni I. Neural topography and content of movement representations. J Cognitive Neurosci 17: 97-112, 2005.
    • De Lange FP, Helmich RC, Toni I. Posture influences motor imagery: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 33: 609 - 617, 2006.
    • Frak VG, Paulignan Y, Jeannerod M. Orientation of the opposition axis in mentally simulated grasping. Exp Brain Res 136: 120 -127, 2001.
    • Grangeon M, Guillot A, Collet C. Postural control during visual and kinesthetic motor imagery. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 36: 47-56, 2011.
    • Grèzes J, Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 12: 1-19, 2001.
    • Guillot A, Collet C, Nguyen V, Maloiun F, Richards C, Doyon J. Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 30: 2157-2172, 2009.
    • Guillot A, Di Rienzo F, MacIntyre T, Moran A, Collet C. Imagining is not doing but involves specific motor commands: a review of experimental data related to motor inhibition. Front Hum Neurosci 6: 247, 2012.
    • Guillot A, Lebon F, Rouffet D, Champely S, Doyon J, Collett C. Muscular responses during motor imagery as a function of muscle contraction types. Int J Psychophysiol 66: 18 -27, 2007.
    • Hamel MF, Lajoie Y. Mental imagery: effects on static balance and attentional demands of the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 17: 223-228, 2005.
    • Jeannerod M. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci 17: 187-245, 1994.
    • Jeannerod M. Motor Cognition: What Actions Tell the Self. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2006.
    • Johnson SH. Thinking ahead: the case for motor imagery in prospective judgments of prehension. Cognition 74: 33-70, 2000.
    • Kaneko F, Murakami T, Onari K, Kurumadani H, Kawaguchi K. Decreased cortical excitability during motor imagery after disuse of an upper limb in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 114: 2397-2403, 2003.
    • Krishnan V, Aruin AS, Latash ML. Early and late components of feedforward postural adjustments to predictable perturbations. Clin Neurophysiol 123: 1016 -1026, 2012.
    • Kuo AD. An optimum state estimation model of sensory integration in human postural balance. J Neural Eng 2: S2350 -S249, 2005.
    • Lebon F, Rouffet D, Collet D, Guillot A. Modulation of EMG power spectrum frequency during motor imagery. Neurosci Lett 435: 181-185, 2008.
    • Lotze M, Montoya P, Erb M, Hülsmann E, Flor H, Klose U, Birbaumer N, Grodd W. Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 11: 491-501, 1999.
    • Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK. A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Gerontol 49: M72-M84, 1994.
    • Maylor EA, Schlaghecken F, Watson DG. Aging and inhibitory processes in memory, attentional, and motor tasks. In: Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology, edited by Engle RW, Sedek G, von Hecker U, McIntosh DN. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005, p. 313-345.
    • Mitra S. Postural costs of suprapostural task load. Hum Mov Sci 22: 253-270, 2003.
    • Mitra S, Knight A, Munn A. Divergent effects of cognitive load on quiet stance and task-linked postural coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 39: 323-328, 2013.
    • Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97-113, 1971.
    • Orr EL, Lacourse MG, Cohen MJ, Cramer SC. Cortical activation during executed, imagined, and observed foot movements. Neuroreport 19: 625- 630, 2008.
    • Papaxanthis C, Schiepatti M, Gdentili R, Pozzo T. Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass. Exp Brain Res 14: 447- 452, 2002.
    • Prablanc C, Pélisson D, Goodale MA. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the hand. Exp Brain Res 62: 293-302, 1986.
    • Prut Y, Fetz EE. Primate spinal interneurons show pre-movement instructed delay activity. Nature 401: 590 -594, 1999.
    • Rodrigues EC, Lemos T, Gouvea B, Volchan E, Imbiriba LA, Vargas CD. Kinesthetic motor imagery modulates body sway. Neuroscience 169: 743- 750, 2010.
    • Schlaghecken F, Birak KS, Maylor EA. Age-related deficits in low-level inhibitory motor control. Psychol Aging 26: 905-918, 2011.
    • Schlaghecken F, Birak KS, Maylor EA. Age-related deficits in efficiency of low-level lateral inhibition. Front Hum Neurosci 6: 102, 2012.
    • Sirigu A, Duhamel JR, Cohen L, Pillon B, Dubois B, Agid Y. The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science 273: 1564 -1568, 1996.
    • Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Chen EE, Small SL. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cereb Cortex 14: 1246 -1255, 2004.
    • Stevens JA. Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition 95: 329 -350, 2004.
    • Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Steyvers M, Levin O, Swinnen SP. Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Exp Brain Res 168: 157- 64, 2006.
    • Swanenburg J, de Bruin ED, Uebelhart D, Mulder T. Falls prediction in elderly people: a 1-year prospective study. Gait Posture 31: 317-321, 2010.
    • Vargas CD, Olivier E, Craighero L, Fadiga L, Duhamel JR, Sirigu A. The influence of hand posture on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex 14: 1200 - 1206, 2004.
    • Wong T, Henriques DY. Visuomotor adaptation does not recalibrate kinesthetic sense of felt hand path. J Neurophysiol 101: 614 - 623, 2009.
    • Zatsiorsky VM, Duarte M. Rambling and trembling in quiet standing. Motor Control 4: 185-200, 2000.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article