Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Languages: English
Types: Article
Models often underestimate blocking in the Atlantic and Pacific basins and this can lead to errors in both weather and climate predictions. Horizontal resolution is often cited as the main culprit for blocking errors due to poorly resolved small-scale variability, the upscale effects of which help to maintain blocks. Although these processes are important for blocking, the authors show that much of the blocking error diagnosed using common methods of analysis and current climate models is directly attributable to the climatological bias of the model. This explains a large proportion of diagnosed blocking error in models used in the recent Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change report. Furthermore, greatly improved statistics are obtained by diagnosing blocking using climate model data corrected to account for mean model biases. To the extent that mean biases may be corrected in low-resolution models, this suggests that such models may be able to generate greatly improved levels of atmospheric blocking.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barriopedro, D., R. Garc´ıa-Herrera, and R. Huth, 2008: Solar modulation of Northern Hemisphere winter blocking. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14118, doi:10.1029/2008JD009789.
    • Berrisford, P., B. J. Hoskins, and E. Tyrlis, 2007: Blocking and Rossby wave breaking on the dynamical tropopause in the Southern Hemisphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2881-2898.
    • D'Andrea, F., and Coauthors, 1998: Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking as simulated by 15 atmospheric general circulation models in the period 1979-1998. Climate Dyn., 14, 385-407.
    • Doblas-Reyes, F. J., M. De´que´, F. Valero, and D. B. Stephenson, 1998: North Atlantic wintertime intraseasonal variability and its sensitivity to GCM horizontal resolution. Tellus, 50A, 573-595.
    • Hinton, T. J., B. J. Hoskins, and G. M. Martin, 2009: The influence of tropical sea-surface temperatures and precipitation on North Pacific atmospheric blocking. Climate Dyn., 33, 549-563.
    • Kaas, E., and G. Branstator, 1993: The relationship between a zonal index and blocking activity. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 3061- 3077.
    • Kug, J.-S., and F.-F. Jin, 2009: Left-hand rule for synoptic eddy feedback on low-frequency flow. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L05709, doi:10.1029/2008GL036435.
    • Lau, N.-C., 1988: Variability of the observed midlatitude storm tracks in relation to low-frequency changes in the circulation pattern. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 2718-2743.
    • Lejena¨ s, H., and H. Økland, 1983: Characteristics of Northern Hemisphere blocking as determined from a long time series of observational data. Tellus, 35A, 350-362.
    • Martin, G. M., M. A. Ringer, V. D. Pope, A. Jones, C. Dearden, and T. J. Hinton, 2006: The physical properties of the atmosphere in the new Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1). Part I: Model description and global climatology. J. Climate, 19, 1274-1301.
    • Masato, G., B. Hoskins, and T. Woollings, 2009: Can the frequency of blocking be described by a red noise process? J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2143-2149.
    • Matsueda, M., R. Mizuta, and S. Kusunoki, 2009: Future change in wintertime atmospheric blocking simulated using a 20-kmmesh atmospheric global circulation model. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D12114, doi:10.1029/2009JD011919.
    • Palmer, T. N., G. J. Shutts, and R. Swinbank, 1986: Alleviation of a westerly bias in general circulation and numerical weather prediction models through an orographic gravity wave drag parametrization. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112, 1001-1039.
    • Pelly, J., and B. Hoskins, 2003: A new perspective on blocking. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 743-755.
    • Ren, H.-L., F.-F. Jin, J.-S. Kug, J.-X. Zhao, and J. Park, 2009: A kinematic mechanism for positive feedback between synoptic eddies and NAO. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L11709, doi:10.1029/ 2009GL037294.
    • Rex, D. F., 1950: Blocking action in the middle troposphere and its effect upon regional climate. 1. An aerological study of blocking action. Tellus, 2, 196-211.
    • Ringer, M. A., and Coauthors, 2006: The physical properties of the atmosphere in the New Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model (HadGEM1). Part II: Aspects of variability and regional climate. J. Climate, 19, 1302-1326.
    • Scaife, A. A., and J. R. Knight, 2008: Ensemble simulations of the cold European winter of 2005/6. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1647-1659.
    • Schwierz, C., M. Croci-Maspoli, and H. C. Davies, 2004: Perspicacious indicators of atmospheric blocking. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06125, doi:10.1029/2003GL019341.
    • Shutts, G. J., 1986: A case study of eddy forcing during an Atlantic blocking episode. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 29, Academic Press, 135-162.
    • Sillmann, J., and M. Croci-Maspoli, 2009: Present and future atmospheric blocking and its impact on European mean and extreme climate. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L10702, doi:10.1029/ 2009GL038259.
    • Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, M. Marquis, K. Averyt, M. M. B. Tignor, H. L. Miller Jr., and Z. Chen, Eds., 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, 996 pp.
    • Tibaldi, S., and F. Molteni, 1990: On the operational predictability of blocking. Tellus, 42A, 343-365.
    • Woollings, T., A. Charlton-Perez, S. Ineson, A. G. Marshall, and G. Masato, 2010: Associations between stratospheric variability and tropospheric blocking. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D06108, doi:10.1029/2009JD012742.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article