Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: ASSOCIATIONS, Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases, DETERMINANTS, R5-920, Alimentation et Nutrition, ADULTS, [SDV.AEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food and Nutrition, Medicine, DOAJ:Medicine (General), DOAJ:Health Sciences, Research, R, Food and Nutrition, RA1-1270, Public aspects of medicine, WALKING, SCIENCE, Medicine (General), B900, Medicine and Health Sciences, RC620-627, BUILT-ENVIRONMENT



A questionnaire to assess physical activity related environmental factors in the European population (a 49-item and an 11-item version) was created as part of the framework of the EU-funded project "Instruments for Assessing Levels of PHysical Activity and fitness (ALPHA)". This paper reports on the development and assessment of the questionnaire's test-retest stability, predictive validity, and applicability to European adults.


The first pilot test was conducted in Belgium, France and the UK. In total 190 adults completed both forms of the ALPHA questionnaire twice with a one-week interval. Physical activity was concurrently measured (i) by administration of the long version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) by interview and (ii) by accelerometry (Actigraph™ device). After adaptations, the second field test took place in Belgium, the UK and Austria; 166 adults completed the adapted questionnaire at two time points, with minimum one-week interval. In both field studies intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and proportion of agreement were computed to assess the stability of the two test scores. Predictive validity was examined in the first field test by correlating the results of the questionnaires with physical activity data from accelerometry and long IPAQ-last 7 days.


The reliability scores of the ALPHA questionnaire were moderate-to good in the first field testing (ICC range 0.66 - 0.86) and good in the second field testing (ICC range 0.71 - 0.87). The proportion of agreement for the ALPHA short increased significantly from the first (range 50 - 83%) to the second field testing (range 85 - 95%). Environmental scales from both versions of the ALPHA questionnaire were significantly associated with self-reported minutes of transport-related walking, and objectively measured low intensity physical activity levels, particularly in women. Both versions were easily administered with an average completion time of six minutes for the 49-item version and less than two minutes for the short version.


The ALPHA questionnaire is an instrument to measure environmental perceptions in relation to physical activity. It appears to have good reliability and predictive validity. The questionnaire is now available to other researchers to investigate its usefulness and applicability across Europe.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Green LW, Richard L, Potvin L: Ecological foundations of health promotion. Am J Health Promot 1996, 10:270-281.
    • 2. Sallis JF, Bauman A, Pratt M: Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med 1998, 15:379-397.
    • 3. Active Living Research. Introduction to the Active Living Research Reference List January - July 2008 2009.
    • 4. Active Living Research. Introduction to the Active Living Research Reference List Jul. - Dec. 2008 2009.
    • 5. Wendel-Vos W, Droomers M, Kremers S, Brug J, Van Lenthe F: Potential environmental determinants of physical activity in adults: A systematic review. Obes Rev 2007, 8:425-440.
    • 6. Ferreira I, van der HK, Wendel-Vos W, Kremers S, van Lenthe FJ, Brug J: Environmental correlates of physical activity in youth - a review and update. Obes Rev 2007, 8:129-154.
    • 7. Foster C, Hillsdon M, Jones A, Grundy C, Wilkinson P, White M, Sheehan B, Wareham N, Thorogood M: Objective Measures of the Environment and Physical Activity - Results of the Environment and Physical Activity Study in English adults. J Phys Activ Health 2009, 6:.
    • 8. Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E: Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity: a review. Am J Prev Med 2002, 22:188-199.
    • 9. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ: The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Soc Sci Med 2002, 54:1793-1812.
    • 10. Emery J, Crump C, Bors P: Reliability and validity of two instruments designed to assess the walking and bicycling suitability of sidewalks and roads. Am J Health Promot 2003, 18:38-46.
    • 11. Kirtland KA, Porter DE, Addy CL, Neet MJ, Williams JE, Sharpe PA, Neff LJ, Kimsey CD Jr, Ainsworth BE: Environmental measures of physical activity supports: perception versus reality. Am J Prev Med 2003, 24:323-331.
    • 12. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D: Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health 2003, 93:1552-1558.
    • 13. Meusel D, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Hägströmer M, Bergman P, Sjöström M: Assessing Levels of Physical Activity in the European Population - the ALPHA project. Selección 2007, 16:9-12.
    • 14. Spittaels H, Foster C, Oppert JM, Rutter H, Oja P, Sjöström M, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Assessment of environmental correlates of physical activity: development of a European questionnaire. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:39.
    • 15. European commission: Guidelines for the development and criteria for the adoption of health survey instruments Luxembourg; 2005.
    • 16. Smith TW: Developing comparable questions in cross-national surveys. In Cross-cultural survey methods Edited by: Harkness JA, Van de Vijver FJR, Molder PH. NJ: Wiley; 2003.
    • 17. Cochrane T, Davey RC, Gidlow C, Smith GR, Fairburn J, Armitage CJ, Stephansen H, Speight S: Small area and individual level predictors of physical activity in urban communities: a multi-level study in Stoke on Trent, England. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009, 6:654-677.
    • 18. Rzewnicki R, Vanden Auweele Y, De Bourdeaudhuij I: Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutr 2003, 6:299-305.
    • 19. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P: International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 35:1381-1395.
    • 20. Tyron WW, Williams R: Fully proportional actigraphy: a new instrument. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput 1996, 28:392-403.
    • 21. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J: Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998, 30:777-781.
    • 22. Nunnally J, Bernstein I: Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
    • 23. Portney L, White M: Foundations of clinical research. Applications to practice. New Yersey: Pearson Education Inc; 2009.
    • 24. Fleiss J: Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley; 1981.
    • 25. Titze S, Stronegger WJ, Janschitz S, Oja P: Association of builtenvironment, social-environment and personal factors with bicycling as a mode of transportation among Austrian city dwellers. Prev Med 2008, 47:252-259.
    • 26. Brownson RC, Chang JJ, Eyler AA, Ainsworth BE, Kirtland KA, Saelens BE, Sallis JF: Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: a comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires. Am J Public Health 2004, 94:473-483.
    • 27. Alexander A, Bergman P, Hägströmer M, Sjöström M: IPAQ environmental module; reliability testing. J Public Health 2006, 14:76-80.
    • 28. Evenson KR, Eyler AA, Wilcox S, Thompson JL, Burke JE: Test-retest reliability of a questionnaire on physical activity and its correlates among women from diverse racial and ethnic groups. Am J Prev Med 2003, 25:15-22.
    • 29. Chen DD: The science of smart growth. Sci Am 2000, 283:84-91.
    • 30. Handy SL, Boarnet MG, Ewing R, Killingsworth RE: How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. Am J Prev Med 2002, 23:64-73.
    • 31. De Bourdeaudhuij I, Teixeira PJ, Cardon G, Deforche B: Environmental and psychosocial correlates of physical activity in Portuguese and Belgian adults. Public Health Nutr 2005, 8:886-895.
    • 32. Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF: Understanding environmental influences on walking; Review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med 2004, 27:67-76.
    • 33. Prins RG, Oenema A, van der HK, Brug J: Objective and perceived availability of physical activity opportunities: differences in associations with physical activity behavior among urban adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:70.
    • 34. Lackey KJ, Kaczynski AT: Correspondence of perceived vs. objective proximity to parks and their relationship to park-based physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:53.
    • 35. McGinn AP, Evenson KR, Herring AH, Huston SL, Rodriguez DA: Exploring associations between physical activity and perceived and objective measures of the built environment. J Urban Health 2007, 84:162-184.
    • 36. Maddison R, Hoorn SV, Jiang Y, Mhurchu CN, Exeter D, Dorey E, Bullen C, Utter J, Schaaf D, Turley M: The environment and physical activity: The influence of psychosocial, perceived and built environmental factors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009, 6:19.
    • 37. Lin L, Moudon AV: Objective versus subjective measures of the built environment, which are most effective in capturing associations with walking? Health Place 2010, 16:339-348.
    • 38. Moudon AV, Lee C, Cheadle AD, Garvin C, Johnson D, Schmid TL, Weathers RD, Lin L: Operational definitions of walkable neighborhood: theoretical and empirical insights. J Phys Act Health 2006, 3:S99-S117.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.