LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Karger
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: P1
Identifiers:doi:10.1159/000434748
Objective: To gain an insight into speech and language therapists’ perspectives and practices on quality of life in aphasia. \ud \ud Participants and Methods: The International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics Aphasia Committee developed a survey questionnaire, which was delivered on-line, anonymously, through SurveyMonkey (November 2012 – April 2013) to clinicians working with people with aphasia in 16 countries across the world.\ud \ud Results: A large number of speech and language therapists responded to the survey, with 19/21 questions answered by 385 – 579 participants. Clinicians were well informed on what constitutes quality of life and viewed it as a complex construct influenced by health, participation, in/dependence, communication, personal factors, and environmental factors. In their clinical practice, they considered quality of life as important, used informal approaches to explore it and aimed to address quality of life goals; yet the majority did not evaluate quality of life in a systematic way. \ud \ud Conclusion: There is a need for training on quality of life to facilitate speech and language therapists to incorporate quality of life outcome measures in their interventions. There is also a need for further research on what interventions improve quality of life in aphasia.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, Fang J, Rowland A, & Black S: Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2010; 91: 196-202.
    • 2. Wade DT: Stroke (acute cerebrovascular disease). In A. Stevens & J. Raftery (Eds) Health Care Needs Assessment. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1994.
    • 3. Hilari K, Needle JJ, & Harrison KL: What are the important factors in health-related quality of life for people with aphasia? A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012;93:S86-S95.
    • 4. Kauhanen ML, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen P et al. Aphasia, depression, and non-verbal cognitive impairment ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovascular Disease 2000; 10: 455-61.
    • 5. Cruice M, Worrall L, & Hickson L: Quantifying aphasic people's social lives in the context of non-aphasic peers. Aphasiology 2006;20: 1210-1225.
    • 6. Dalemans RJP, de Witte L, Wade D, & van den Heuvel W: Social participation through the eyes of people with aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 2010; 45: 537-550.
    • 7. Davidson B, Howe T, Worrall L, Hickson L, & Togher L: Social participation for older people with aphasia: the impact of communication disability on friendships. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2008;15: 325- 340.
    • 8. Northcott S, Hilari K. Why do people lose their friends after a stroke? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article