Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Denrell, Jerker; Kovács, Balázs (2015)
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Journal: PLoS ONE
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Q, R, Research Article, BF, Science, Medicine
Most studies of fashion and fads focus on objects and practices that once were popular. We argue that limiting the sample to such trajectories generates a selection bias that obscures the underlying process and generates biased estimates. Through simulations and the analysis of a data set that has previously not been used to analyze the rise and fall of cultural practices, the New York Times text archive, we show that studying a whole range of cultural objects, both popular and less popular, is essential for understanding the drivers of popularity. In particular, we show that estimates of statistical models of the drivers of popularity will be biased if researchers use only trajectories of those practices that once were popular.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Veblen T (1912) The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: Macmillan.
    • 2. Abrahamson E (1996) Managerial fashion. Academy of Management Review 21:254-285.
    • 3. Lieberson S (2000) A matter of taste: How names, fashions, and culture change. Yale Univ Press.
    • 4. Strang D, Macy MW (2001) In Search of Excellence: Fads, Success Stories, and Adaptive Emulation. American Journal of Sociology 107:147-182.
    • 5. Gureckis TM, Goldstone RL (2009) How you named your child: Understanding the relationship between individual decision making and collective outcomes. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(4), 651-674. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01046.x PMID: 25163451
    • 6. Acerbi A, Ghirlanda S, Enquist M (2012) The logic of fashion cycles. PloS One 7.3 e32541.
    • Chandler AD Jr (1962) Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    • Schelling TC (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.
    • 9. Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press. PMID: 15777467
    • 10. Fast NJ, Heath C, Wu G (2009) Common ground and cultural prominence: How conversation reinforces culture. Psychological Science 20:904-911. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02387.x PMID: 19538432
    • 11. Simmel G (1904) Fashion. International Quarterly 10:130-155.
    • 12. Berger J, Le Mens G (2009) How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:8146-8150. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812647106 PMID: 19416813
    • 13. Jonsson S (2009) Refraining from imitation: Professional resistance and limited diffusion in a financial market. Organization Science, 20(1), 172-186.
    • 14. Etzion D (2013) Diffusion as classification. Organization Science, 25(2), 420-437.
    • 15. Strang D, Soule SA (1998) Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills. Annual Review of Sociology 24:265-90.
    • 16. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
    • 17. Denrell JC, Kovács B (2008) Selective Sampling of Empirical Settings. Administrative Science Quarterly 53:109-144.
    • 18. Robinson DE (1976) Fashions in shaving and trimming of the beard: The men of the Illustrated London News, 1842-1972. American Journal of Sociology 81:1133-1141.
    • 19. David RJ, Strang D (2006) When fashion is fleeting: Transitory collective beliefs and the dynamics of TQM consulting. The Academy of Management Journal 49:215-233.
    • 20. Carroll GR, Hannan MT (2000) The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton University Press.
    • 21. Abrahamson E, Eisenman M (2008) Employee-management Techniques: Transient Fads or Trending Fashions? Administrative Science Quarterly 53:719-744.
    • 22. Zipf GK (1949) Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
    • 23. Naus JI (1966) Some probabilities, expectations and variances for the size of largest clusters and smallest intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association pp. 1191-1199.
    • 24. Wallenstein S (1980) A test for detection of clustering over time. American Journal of Epidemiology 111:367. PMID: 7361759
    • 25. Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science 15:215-227.
    • 26. Hedström P (2005) Dissecting the social. Cambridge University Press.
    • 27. Hamer WH (1906) The Milroy lectures on epidemic disease in England: the evidence of variability and of persistency of type. Bedford Press.
    • 28. Mahajan V, Peterson RA (1985) Models for innovation diffusion. Sage Publications Beverly Hills, CA.
    • 29. Deutsch M, Gerard HB (1955) A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51:629-636. PMID: 13286010
    • 30. Becker GS (1991) A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. Journal of Political Economy 99:1109-1116.
    • 31. Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy 100:992-1026.
    • 32. Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83:1420-1443.
    • 33. Festinger L, Schachter S, Back KW (1963) Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford Univ Press.
    • 34. Wood W (2000) Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual review of psychology 51:539-570. PMID: 10751980
    • 35. Coleman JS (1964) Introduction to mathematical sociology. Free Press New York.
    • 36. Barabasi AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509. PMID: 10521342
    • 37. Watts DJ (2002) A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99:5766. PMID: 16578874
    • 38. Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17:475.
    • 39. Weng L, Flammini A, Vespignani A, Menczer F (2012) Competition among memes in a world with limited attention. Scientific Reports, 2.
    • 40. Lomi A, Larsen ER, Freeman JH (2005) Things change: dynamic resource constraints and systemdependent selection in the evolution of organizational populations. Management Science 51:882.
    • 41. Ruef M (2004) For whom the bell tolls: ecological perspectives on industrial decline and resurgence. Industrial and Corporate Change 13:61.
    • 42. Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/ McGraw-Hill.
    • 43. Miller CM, McIntyre SH, Mantrala MK (1993) Toward formalizing fashion theory. Journal of Marketing Research 30:142-157.
    • 44. Cowan R, Cowan W, Swann GMP (2004) Waves in consumption with interdependence among consumers. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique 37:149-177.
    • 45. Bailey N, T J (1957) The mathematical theory of epidemics. Hafner.
    • 46. Cojocaru M-G, Thille H, Thommes E, Nelson D, Greenhalgh S. Social influence and dynamic demand for new products. Environmental Modelling & Software 50 (2013) 169-185.
    • 47. Cadavid L, Cardona CJF (2014) Saddle Points in Innovation Diffusion Curves: An Explanation from Bounded Rationality. In Advances in Social Simulation, pp. 73-82. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    • 48. Saavedra S, Reed-Tsochas F, Uzzi B (2008) Asymmetric disassembly and robustness in declining networks Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 43: 16466-16471.
    • 49. Holtz G (2014) Generating social practices. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 17(1), 17.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article