LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF
Over five experiments we test the fictive pass asymmetry hypothesis. Following observations of ethics and public reactions to media, we propose that fictional contexts, such as reality, imagination, and virtual environments, will mitigate people’s moral condemnation of harm violations, more so than purity violations. That is, imagining a purely harmful act is given a “fictive pass,” in moral judgment, whereas imagining an abnormal act involving the body is evaluated more negatively because it is seen as more diagnostic of bad character. For Experiment 1, an undergraduate sample (N = 250) evaluated nine vignettes depicting an agent committing either violations of harm or purity in real life, watching them in films, or imagining them. For Experiments 2 and 3, online participants (N = 375 and N = 321, respectively) evaluated a single vignette depicting an agent committing a violation of harm or purity that either occurred in real life, was imagined, watched in a film, or performed in a video game. Experiment 4 (N = 348) used an analysis of moderated mediation to demonstrate that the perceived wrongness of fictional purity violations is explained both by the extent to which they are seen as a cue to, and a cause of, a poor moral character. Lastly, Experiment 5 (N = 484) validated our manipulations and included the presumption of desire as an additional mediator of the fictive pass asymmetry effects. We discuss implications for moral theories of act and character, anger and disgust, and for media use and regulation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 106(1), 148-168 . http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0034726
    • Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of personality and social psychology,101(2), 366. doi: 10.1037/a0021847
    • Gray, K., Schein, C., & Ward, A. F. (2014). The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1600-1615. doi: http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0036149
    • Gray, K., Waytz, A., & Young, L. (2012). The moral dyad: A fundamental template unifying moral judgment. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 206-215. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.686247
    • Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Blaming God for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 7-16. doi: 10.1177/1088868309350299
    • Greenwald, A. G. (1976). Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? Psychological Bulletin, 83(2), 314. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.2.314
    • Guerra, V. M., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2010). The community, autonomy, and divinity scale (CADS): A new tool for the cross-cultural study of morality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(1), 35-50. doi: 10.1177/0022022109348919
    • Gutierrez, R., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2007). Anger, disgust, and presumption of harm as reactions to taboo-breaking behaviors. Emotion, 7(4), 853-868. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.853
    • Gutierrez, R., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2011). Disgusting but harmless moral violations are perceived as harmful due to the negative emotions they elicit. Revista de Psicologia Social, 26(1), 141-148. doi: 10.1174/021347411794078381
    • Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613-628. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.65.4.613
    • Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Uhlmann, E. (2012). Mindless, harmless, and blameworthy. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 185-188. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.670100
    • Price, J., Palsson, C., & Gentile, D. (2014). What matters in movie ratings? Cross-country differences in how content influences mature movie ratings. Journal of Children and Media, 8(3), 240-252. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2014.880359
    • Rozin, P., Millman, L., & Nemeroff, C. (1986). Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 703-712. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.4.703
    • Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2011b). Moral anger is more flexible than moral disgust. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 360 364. doi:10.1177/1948550610391678
    • Russell, P. S., Piazza, J., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2013). CAD revisited effects of the word moral on the moral relevance of disgust (and other emotions). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(1), 62-68. doi: 10.1177/194855061244291
    • Russell, P. S., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2013). Bodily moral disgust: What it is, how it is different from anger, and why it is an unreasoned emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 328-351. doi:10.1037/a0029319
    • Uhlmann, E. L., Zhu, L., & Diermeier, D. (2014). When actions speak volumes: The role of inferences about moral character in outrage over racial bigotry. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 23-29. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1987
    • Vauclair, C. M., & Fischer, R. (2011). Do cultural values predict individuals' moral attitudes? A cross cultural multilevel approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 645-657. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.794
    • Wilson, D. B. (2005). Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and Stata. Retrived November 6, 20015 from http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html
    • Young, G., & Whitty, M. T. (2011). Should gamespace be a taboo-free zone? Moral and psychological implications for single-player video games. Theory & Psychology, 21(6), 802- 820. doi: 10.1177/0959354310378926
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
    73
    73%
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article