LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Construction industry contributes a large portion of waste to landfill, which in turns results in environmental pollution and CO2 emission. Despite the adoption of several waste management strategies, waste reduction to landfill continues seeming an insurmountable challenge. This paper explores factors impeding the effectiveness of existing waste management strategies, as well as strategies for reducing waste intensiveness of the construction industry. Drawing on series of semi structured focus group discussions with experts from the UK leading construction companies, this paper combines phenomenological approach with a critical review and analysis of extant literatures. Five broad categories of factors and practices are responsible for ineffectiveness of construction and demolition waste management strategies, which subsequently results in waste intensiveness of the industry. These include end of pipe treatment of waste, externality and incompatibility of waste management tools with design tools, atomism of waste management strategies, perceived or unexpected high cost of waste management, and culture of waste behaviour within the industry. To reduce waste intensiveness of the construction industry, the study suggests that six factors are requisites. These are tackling of waste at design stage, whole life waste consideration, compliance of waste management solutions with BIM, cheaper cost of waste management practice, increased stringency of waste management legislation and fiscal policies, and research and enlightenment. The proposed strategies are not only important for achieving low waste construction projects, they are important for reducing waste intensiveness of the construction. Implementation of the suggested measures would drive waste management practices within the construction industry.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Akintoye, A., Taylor, C. & Fitzgerald, E. 1998. Risk analysis and management of private finance initiative projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 5(1), 9-21.
    • Al-Hajj, A., and Hamani, K., 2011. Material Waste in the UAE Construction Industry: Main Causes and Minimization Practices. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 7(4), pp. 221 - 235.
    • Anderson, J., and Thornback, J., 2012. A guide to understanding the embodied impacts of construction products. London: Construction Products Association.
    • Anink, D., Mak, J., and Boonstra, C., 1996. Handbook of Sustainable Building: An Environmental Preference Method for Selection of Materials for Use in Construction and Refurbishment. London: James and James.
    • Durana, X., Lenihana, H., and O'Reganb, B., 2006. A model for assessing the economic viability of construction and demolition waste recycling-the case of Ireland. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 46(3), pp. 302-320.
    • Durmus, S., and Gur, S.O., 2011. Methodology of deconstruction in architectural education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(2011), pp. 1586-1594
    • Eadie, R., Browne, M., Odeyinka, H., McKeown, C., and McNiff, S., 2013. BIM implementation throughout the UK construction project lifecycle: An analysis. Automation in Construction, 36(2013), pp. 145-151
    • Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., and Liston, K., 2011. BIM Handbook: A guide to Building Information Modelling for Owners, managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons
    • Edie, J. M., 1987. Edmund Husserl's phenomenology: A critical commentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    • Ekanayake, L.L., and Ofori, G., 2004. Building waste assessment score: Design-based tool. Building and Environment, 39(7), pp. 851-861.
    • Enshassi, A., Al-Najjar, J., and Kumaraswamy, M., 2009. Delays and cost overruns in the construction projects in the Gaza Strip. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 14(2), pp. 126-151.
    • EU, 2010. “Being wise with waste: The EU's approach to waste management”. Luxembourg: European Union.
    • Faniran, O.O, and Caban, G., 1998. Minimizing waste on construction project sites. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 5(2), pp. 182-188.
    • Formoso, C.T., Soibelman, L., De Cesare, C., and Isatto, E.L., 2002. Material Waste in Building Industry: Main Causes and Prevention. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(4), pp. 316 - 325.
    • Gao, W., Ariyama, T., Ojima, T., and Meier, A., 2001. Energy Impacts of Recycling Disassembly Materials in Residential Buildings. Energy and Buildings 33(6), pp. 553 - 562.
    • Guthrie, P., and Mallet, H., 1995. Waste minimization and recycling in construction: A review. London: CIRIA.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article