LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: genetic structures
Purpose: To examine the effect of a home visit–based visual rehabilitation intervention on: (1) self-reported visual function and (2) depression, wellbeing, loneliness, adjustment to visual loss, and generic health-related quality of life.\ud \ud Methods: In an exploratory, assessor-masked, individually randomized, single-center controlled trial, 67 participants (age: 75.22 ± 16.21 years) with low vision were allocated either to receive the home visit–based visual rehabilitation intervention (n = 35) or to a waiting list control arm (n = 32). Outcome measures were collected by telephone interview at baseline and 6 months later. The primary outcome measure was the 48-item Veterans Affairs Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VA LV VFQ-48). Secondary outcome measures were: the Patient Health Questionnaire; the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, the Adjustment to Age-related Visual Loss Scale, the standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire, and the University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale. Questionnaire scores at follow-up were analyzed using analysis of covariance, controlling for the baseline score and the variables, age, number of comorbidities, visual acuity, and baseline wellbeing score.\ud \ud Results: Visual function (VA LV VFQ-48) improved at follow-up in both groups, with a significantly greater improvement demonstrated by the intervention group (95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.68 logits, P = 0.031), with a moderate effect size (0.55). Secondary outcomes did not indicate any statistically significant differences between groups.\ud \ud Conclusions: The study provides preliminary evidence that a home visit–based visual rehabilitation intervention has a positive influence on vision-related functional outcomes. A larger trial with an expanded intervention to include a mental health component and cost-effectiveness analysis is needed. (ISRCTN.com number, 44807874.)
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. World Health Organization. Global data on visual impairments, 2010. Available at: http://www.who.int/blindness/ GLOBALDATAFINALforweb.pdf. Accessed on March 30, 2016.
    • 2. Royal National Institute of Blind People. Key information and statistics. Available at: http://www.rnib.org.uk/knowledgeand-research-hub/key-information-and-statistics. Accessed on March 30, 2016.
    • 3. Nilsson UL, Nilsson SE. Rehabilitation of the visually handicapped with advanced macular degeneration. A follow-up study at the Low Vision Clinic, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Linkoping. Doc Ophthalmol. 1986;62:345-367.
    • 4. Court H, Ryan B, Bunce C, Margrain TH. How effective is the new community-based Welsh low vision service? Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:178-184.
    • 5. Girdler SJ, Boldy DP, Dhaliwal SS, Crowley M, Packer TL. Vision self-management for older adults: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:223-228.
    • 6. Ryan B, White S, Wild J, Court H, Margrain TH. The newly established primary care based Welsh Low Vision Service is effective and has improved access to low vision services in Wales. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30:358-364.
    • 7. Stelmack JA, Tang XC, Reda DJ, et al. Outcomes of the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT). Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:608-617.
    • 8. Binns AM, Bunce C, Dickinson C, et al. How effective is low vision service provision? A systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57:34-65.
    • 9. Rabiee P, Parker G, Bernard S, Baxter K. Vision Rehabilitation Services: What Is the Evidence? Heslington, UK: University of York; 2015. Available at: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/ research/pdf/VIrehabTPT.pdf. Accessed on Aug 26, 2016.
    • 10. Guide Dogs. Independence and well-being in sight - developing the vision. A consultation on the future of rehabilitation services for visually impaired adults in England. 200 7. Ava i l a b l e a t : htt p: //w w w.gu i d ed o g s. o rg . uk / rehabproject. Accessed on March 30, 2016.
    • 11. Kuyk T, Liu L, Elliott JL, et al. Health-related quality of life following blind rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:497- 507.
    • 12. de Boer MR, Twisk J, Moll AC, Voelker-Dieben HJ, de Vet HC, van Rens GH. Outcomes of low-vision services using optometric and multidisciplinary approaches: a non-randomized comparison. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006;26:535-544.
    • 13. Reeves BC, Harper RA, Russell WB. Enhanced low vision rehabilitation for people with age related macular degeneration: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88: 1443-1449.
    • 14. Horowitz A, Brennan M, Reinhardt JP, Macmillan T. The impact of assistive device use on disability and depression among older adults with age-related vision impairments. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006;61:S274-S280.
    • 15. Horowitz A, Reinhardt JP, Boerner K. The effect of rehabilitation on depression among visually disabled older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2005;9:563-570.
    • 16. Horowitz A, Reinhardt JP, Boerner K, Travis LA. The influence of health, social support quality and rehabilitation on depression among disabled elders. Aging Ment Health. 2003; 7:342-350.
    • 17. Gillespie-Gallery H, Conway ML, Subramanian A. Are rehabilitation services for patients in UK eye clinics adequate? A survey of eye care professionals. Eye (Lond). 2012;26:1302- 1309.
    • 18. Acton JH, Molik B, Binns A, Court H, Margrain TH. Effect of rehabilitation worker input on visual function outcomes in individuals with low vision: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:105.
    • 19. Stelmack JA, Szlyk JP, Stelmack TR, et al. Psychometric properties of the Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3919- 3928.
    • 20. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16: 606-613.
    • 21. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:63.
    • 22. Horowitz A, Reinhardt JP. Development of the adaptation to age-related vision loss scale. J Vis Impair Blind. 1998;92:30- 41.
    • 23. EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199- 208.
    • 24. Russell D, Peplau LA, Ferguson ML. Developing a measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1978;42:290-294.
    • 25. Harper R, Doorduyn K, Reeves B, Slater L. Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19:3-11.
    • 26. Andrich D. Rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978;43:561-573.
    • 27. Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2001.
    • 28. Linacre JM. A User's Guide to Winsteps: Rasch-Model Computer Programs. Chicago: Winsteps; 2005.
    • 29. Packer TL, Girdler S, Boldy DP, Dhaliwal SS, Crowley M. Vision self-management for older adults: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:1353-1361.
    • 30. Stelmack JA, Moran D, Dean D, Massof RW. Short- and longterm effects of an intensive inpatient vision rehabilitation program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:691-695.
    • 31. Dahlin Ivanoff S, Sonn U, Svensson E. A health education program for elderly persons with visual impairments and perceived security in the performance of daily occupations: a randomized study. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:322-330.
    • 32. Eklund K, Sjostrand J, Dahlin-Ivanoff S. A randomized controlled trial of a health-promotion programme and its effect on ADL dependence and self-reported health problems for the elderly visually impaired. Scand J Occup Ther. 2008;15: 68-74.
    • 33. Eklund K, Sonn U, Dahlin-Ivanoff S. Long-term evaluation of a health education programme for elderly persons with visual impairment. A randomized study. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26: 401-409.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article