Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Greenwood, David; Walker, Peter; Walker, Alan (2008)
Publisher: Association of Researchers in Construction Management
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: K100
The traditional role of the Architect on UK building projects is well-known and has been the subject of much study and comment. However, recent surveys indicate that design-and-build arrangements now exceed traditional procurement in terms of their share of total UK construction. On such projects, architects and other designers are engaged, not by the employer, but under sub-contract to the main contractor. The question arises as to the effect this has had. This has been approached by considering architects and other design consultants as professional contractors, as opposed to trade contractors - a term adopted to describe the more traditional type of subcontractor. Within these distinctions there are contractual, managerial and cultural implications for the relationships between the parties. To explore this further, representatives of five main contractors were questioned on their relationships with the two types. Clear differences emerged in matters such as contract formation, price-setting, payment and claims; the treatment of selection, work scheduling, and defects / omissions was more complicated. Within trade contractors there is a strong argument for recognising a further category of specialist contractors, who include a design service in their work package. Within the professional contractor category, architects were clearly differentiated from other design team members. The findings are analysed to suggest a theoretical framework with four dimensions that relate to process/product, attitude/motivation, working culture and relative power. The concern is not to be definitive at this stage, but to suggest an agenda for future research into the issues that have emerged.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ankrah, N and Langford D (2005) Architects and Contractors: a comparative study of organisational cultures. Construction Management and Economics, 23(6), 595-607.
    • Bennett, J and Ferry, D (1990) Specialist contractors: A review of issues raised by their new role in building. Construction Management and Economics, 8(3), 259-283.
    • Bloor, G and Dawson, P (1994) Understanding Professional Culture in Organisational Culture. Organisation Studies 15(2) 275-295.
    • Bresnen, MJ (1991) Construction contracting in theory and practice: A case study. Construction Management and Economics, 9(3), 247-262.
    • Broadbent, G (1984) Design in architecture. In: Brandon, PS and Powell, JA (eds.) Quality and Profit in Building Design. London: E&FN Spon.
    • Cherns, AB and Bryant, DT (1984) Studying the client's role in construction management. Construction Management and Economics, 2(2): 177-184
    • Contract Journal (2008) Top 100 Construction Companies 200. Available at: http://www.contractjournal.com/Articles/2008/01/17/58182/top-100-constructioncompanies-2007.html. [Accessed 3 May 2008].
    • Dietrich, M and Roberts, J (1997) Beyond the Economics of Professionalism. In: Broadbent J., Dietrich M., and Roberts J.(eds.) The End of the Professions? London: Routledge.
    • Eisenhardt, KM (1989) Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.
    • Greenwood, DJ and Walker, P (2004) Procurement, contracts and conditions of engagement. In: Murray, M and Langford, D (eds.) Architect's Handbook of Construction Project Management. London: RIBA Enterprises.
    • Greenwood, DJ (2005) Partnering Approaches and Supply Chain Relations. Construction Information Quarterly 7(1) 3-5, Chartered Institute of Building, Ascot.
    • Hughes, WP, Hillebrandt, PM, Greenwood, DJ and Kwawu, W (2006) Procurement in the Construction Industry: The impact and cost of alternative market and supply processes. Spon Research Series. London: Taylor and Francis.
    • Masterman, JWE (1992) An Introduction to Building Procurement Systems. London: Spons.
    • Newcombe, R (1996) Empowering the construction project team. International Journal of Project Management 14(2), 75-80.
    • Nicholson, MP (1992) Architectural Management. London: E&FN Spon.
    • Pinnington A and Morris T (2002), Transforming the Architect: Ownership Form and Archetype Change. Organisation Studies 23(2), 189-210.
    • RICS (1998) The Standard Method of Measurement of Building Works, 7. London: RICS Publications.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article