Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wilson, C.B.; Davies, S.; Nolan, M. (2009)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Personal relationships are all integral part of living, working and visiting in care homes, but little research has made relationships the main focus of enquiry, and there have been few studies of the perspectives of residents, staff and family members. The study reported here sought to redress this neglect. Using a constructivist approach, the nature and types of relationships between residents, staff and family members were explored in three care homes in England using combined methods including participant observation, interviews and focus groups. The data collection and analysis Occurred iteratively Over 21 months and three types of relationships were identified: 'pragmatic relationships' that primarily focus oil the instrumental aspects of care; 'personal and responsive relationships' that engage more fully with the particular needs of individual residents; and 'reciprocal relationships' that recognise the roles of residents, staff and family members in creating a sense of community within the home. This paper explores the contributions made by staff; residents and family members in the development of these relationships. The findings enhance our understanding of the role of inter-personal relationships in care home settings and of the factors that condition them. The implications for developing improved practice in care ponies are also considered.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Baldwin, N., Harris, J. and Kelly, D. 1993. Institutionalisation: why blame the institution? Ageing & Society, 13, 1, 69-81.
    • Barnes, M. 2005. The same old process? Older people, participation and deliberation. Ageing & Society, 25, 2 ,245-59.
    • Bebbington, A., Darton, R. and Netten A. 2001. Care Homes for Older People. Volume 2, Admissions, Needs and Outcomes. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK. Available online at http://www.pssru.ac.uk/research.php#Prog04 [Accessed 4/10/06].
    • Beringeer, T.R.O. and Crawford, V.L.S. 2003. Admissions to elderly care institutions in the United Kingdom. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 13, 1, 95-101.
    • Bouisson, J. and Swendsen, J. 2003. Routinization and emotional well being: an experience sampling investigation in an elderly French sample. Journals of Gerontology: Psychology Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, 5, 280-2.
    • Bowers, B. J., Fibich, B. and Jacobson, N. 2001. Practice concepts. Care-as-service, careas-relating, care-as-comfort: understanding nursing home residents' definitions of quality. The Gerontologist, 41, 4, 539-45.
    • Grau, L., Chandler, B. and Saunders, C. 1995. Nursing home residents' perceptions of the quality of their care. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing, 33, 1, 35-41.
    • Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park, California.
    • Haggstrom, E., Skovdahl, K., Flackman, B., Kihlgren, A.L. and Kihlgren, M. 2005. Work satisfaction and dissatisfaction: caregivers' experiences after a two-year intervention in a newly opened nursing home. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14, 1, 9-19.
    • Jackson, E. M. 1997. Dimensions of care in five United States nursing homes: identifying invisible work in care-giving. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 34, 3 192-200.
    • Jones, R. 2007. A journey through the years: ageing and social care. Ageing Horizons, 2, 6, 42-51. Available online at http://www.ageing.ox.ac.uk/ageinghorizonsnew/ltc/jones_ltc.pdf [Accessed 20 December 2007]. Not cited in text
    • Rantz, M. J., Zwygart-Stauffacher, M., Popejoy, L., Grando, V., Mehr, D. R., Hicks, L.L., Conn, V., Wipke-Tevis,D.,Porter, R., Bostick, J. and Meridean, M. 1999. Nursing home care quality: a multidimensional theoretical model integrating the views of consumers and providers. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 14, 1, 16-37.
    • Raynes, N. 1998. Involving residents in quality specification. Ageing & Society, 18, 1, 65- 78.
    • Reed, J. 1992. Individualised care: some implications. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 1, 1, 7- 12.
    • Reed, J. and Bond, S. 1991. Nurses' assessment of elderly patients in hospital. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 16, 1350-7. Pubmed found 28, 1, 55-64. Please confirm Reed, J., Cook, G. and Stanley, D. 1999. Promoting partnership with older people through quality assurance systems: issues arising in care homes. NT Research, 4, 5, 353-63.
    • Rodwell, M.K. 1998. Social Work Constructivist Research. Garland, New York.
    • Ronch, J. 2004. Changing institutional culture: can we re-value the nursing home? Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 43, 1, 61-82.
    • Ryan, A. A. and Scullion, H. F. 2000. Nursing home placement: an exploration of the experiences of family carers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 5, 1187-95.
    • 96 hours 60 hours
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article