Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Goh, Ian (2017)
Publisher: 0004-0975
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: hca
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. London.
    • _____. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge.
    • Armstrong, D. 1989. Horace. New Haven, CT.
    • Auhagen, U. 2001. “Lucilius und die Komödie,” in G. Manuwald, ed., Der Satiriker Lucilius und seine Zeit. Munich. 9-23.
    • Babcock, C. L. 1965. “The Early Career of Fulvia,” AJPh 86.1-32.
    • Bain, D. M. 1991. “Six Greek Verbs of Sexual Congress,” CQ 41: 51-77.
    • _____. 2007. “Low Words in High Places: Sex, Bodily Functions, and Body Parts in Homeric Epic and Other Higher Genres,” in P. J. Finglass, C. Collard & N. J. Richardson, eds., Hesperos: Studies in Ancient Greek Poetry Presented to M. L. West on his Seventieth Birthday. Oxford. 40-57.
    • Barchiesi, A. & Cucchiarelli, A. 2005. “Satire and the Poet: The Body as Self-Referential Symbol,” in K. Freudenburg, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Cambridge. 207-23.
    • Barsby, J. 1999. Terence: Eunuchus. Cambridge.
    • Batstone, W. W. 2002. “Catullus and Bakhtin: The Problems of a Dialogic Lyric,” in R. Bracht Branham, ed., Bakhtin and the Classics. Evanston, IL. 99-136.
    • Braund, S. M. 2004. “Libertas or Licentia? Freedom and Criticism in Roman Satire,” in I. Sluiter & R. M. Rosen, eds., Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Leiden. 409-28.
    • Brink, C. O. 1982. Horace on Poetry. Vol. 3, Epistles, Book II. Cambridge.
    • Chahoud, A. 2011. “The Language of Latin Verse Satire,” in J. Clackson, ed., A Companion to the Latin Language. Malden, MA. 367-83.
    • Charpin, F. 1978. Lucilius: Satires, Vol. 1. Paris.
    • Christes, J. 1971. Der frühe Lucilius: Rekonstruktion und Interpretation des XXVI. Buches sowie von Teilen des XXX. Buches. Heidelberg.
    • Cichorius, C. 1908. Untersuchungen zu Lucilius. Berlin.
    • Classen, C. J. 1996. “Grundlagen und Absicht der Kritik des Lucilius,” in C. Klodt, ed., Satura lanx: Festchrift für Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag. Hildesheim. 11-28.
    • Compton-Engle, G. 2015. Costume in the Comedies of Aristophanes. New York.
    • Corbeill, A. 1996. Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton.
    • Courtney, E. J. 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.
    • Crönert, W. 1910. “Variae lectiones,” RhM 65.461-71.
    • Csapo, E. 2013. “Comedy and the Pompe: Dionysian Genre-Crossing,” in E. Bakola, L. Prauscello & M. Telò, eds. Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres. Cambridge. 40-80.
    • Cucchiarelli, A. 2001. La satira e il poeta: Orazio tra i Epodi e Sermones. Pisa.
    • D'Alessandro Behr, F. 2005. “Open Bodies and Closed Minds? Persius' Saturae in the Light of Bakhtin and Voloshinov,” in R. Bracht Branham, ed. The Bakhtin Circle and Ancient Narrative. Groningen. 260-96.
    • Dixon, S. M. 2001. Reading Roman Women: Sources, “Genres” and Real Life. London.
    • Döpp, S. 2008. “'Credat Iudaeus Apella, non ego.' Die Satiriker Horaz, Persius und Juvenal über eine Minderheit,” in T. Haye & F. Schnoor, eds., Epochen der Satire: Traditionslinien einer literarischen Gattung in Antike, Mittelalter und Renaissance. Hildesheim. 15-33.
    • Dugan, J. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.
    • Dunbar, N. 1995. Aristophanes: Birds. Oxford.
    • Fantham, E. 1989. “Mime: The Missing Link in Roman Literary History,” CW 82.153-63.
    • Farrell, J. 2007. “Horace's Body, Horace's Books,” in S. J. Heyworth, ed., Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Oxford. 174-93.
    • Feldman, L. H. 1996. Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World: Attitudes and Interactions from Alexander to Justinian. Princeton.
    • Ferriss-Hill, J. L. 2011. “A Stroll with Lucilius: Horace, Satires 1.9 Reconsidered,” AJPh 132.429-55.
    • _____. 2015. Roman Satire and the Old Comic Tradition. New York.
    • Fischer, J. 1999. “Der Zwerg, der Phallos und Harpokrates: Groteskfiguren aus dem ptolemaischen Agypten,” in H. Felber & S. Pfisterer-Haas, eds., Kanobos. Forschungen zum griechischromischen Agypten, 1. Leipzig, 27-45.
    • Fiske, G. C. 1920. Lucilius and Horace: A Study in the Classical Theory of Imitation. Madison, WI.
    • Foley, H. P. 2000. “The Comic Body in Greek Art and Drama,” in B. Cohen, ed., Not the Classical Ideal: Athens and the Construction of the Other in Greek Art. Leiden. 275-311.
    • Freudenburg, K. 1990. “Horace's Satiric Program and the Language of Contemporary Theory in Satires 2.1,” AJPh 111.187-293.
    • _____. 1993. The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton.
    • _____. 2001. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. Cambridge.
    • Gibson, R. 2007. Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace, and Ovid's Ars Amatoria. London.
    • Gigante, M. 1993. Orazio, Una misura per l'amore: Lettura della satira seconda del primo libro. Venosa.
    • Goh, I. 2015. “A Note on a Euphemism in Lucilius,” HSCPh 109 (forthcoming).
    • Gowers, E. 1993. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford.
    • _____. 2011. “The Road to Sicily: Lucilius to Seneca,” Ramus 40: 168-97.
    • _____. 2012. Horace: Satires Book 1. Cambridge.
    • Graf, F. 2005. “Satire in a Ritual Context,” in K. Freudenburg, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Cambridge. 192-206.
    • Green, J. R. 2006. “The Persistent Phallos: Regional Variability in the Performance Style of Comedy,” in J. Davidson, F. Muecke & P. Wilson, eds., Greek Drama III: Essays in Honour of Kevin Lee. London. 141-62.
    • Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca, NY.
    • _____. 2002. Diaspora: Jews Amidst Greeks and Romans. Cambridge, MA.
    • Hass, K. 2007. Lucilius und der Beginn der Persönlichkeitsdichtung in Rom. Stuttgart.
    • Henderson, J. 1991. The Maculate Muse: Obscene Language in Attic Comedy. Oxford.
    • Henderson, J. 1989. “Satire Writes 'Woman': Gendersong,” PCPhS 35.50-80.
    • _____. 1993. “Be Alert (Your Country Needs Lerts): Horace, Satires 1.9,” PCPhS 39.67-93.
    • _____. 1998. “Virgil, Eclogue 9: Valleydiction,” PVS 23.149-76.
    • Hersch, K. K. 2010. The Roman Wedding: Ritual and Meaning in Antiquity. Cambridge.
    • Hollis, A. 2007. Fragments of Roman Poetry c. 60 BC-AD 20. Oxford.
    • Hooley, D. 1999. “Horace's Rud(e)-imentary Muse: Sat. 1.2,” Electronic Antiquity 5.2, at http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/ElAnt/V5N2/hooley.html.
    • Housman, A. E. 1907. “Luciliana,” CQ 1.53-74, 148-59.
    • Hughes, A. 2011. Performing Greek Comedy. Cambridge.
    • Hutchinson, G. O. 2012. “Booking Lovers: Desire and Design in Catullus,” in I. M. le M. du Quesnay & A. J. Woodman, eds., Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. Oxford. 48-78.
    • _____. 2013. Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality. Oxford.
    • Huzar, E. G. 1986-7. “Mark Antony: Marriages vs. Careers,” CJ 81.97-111.
    • Isaac, B. H. 2004. The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity. Princeton.
    • Jocelyn, H. D. 1996. “C. Licinius Macer Calvus, fr. 18 Büchner,” Eikasmos 7.243-54.
    • Johnson, M. & Ryan, T. 2005. Sexuality in Greek and Roman Society and Literature: A Sourcebook. New York.
    • Jones, F. 2007. Juvenal and the Satiric Genre. London.
    • Kraus, C. S. 2005. “Hair, Hegemony, and Historiography: Caesar's Style and its Earliest Critics,” in J. N. Adams, M. Lapidge & T. Reinhardt, eds., Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose. Oxford. 97- 115.
    • Krenkel, W. 1970. Lucilius: Satiren. 2 vols. Leiden.
    • Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. Leeds.
    • Marshall, C. W. 2006. The Stagecraft and Performance of Roman Comedy. Cambridge.
    • Marx, F. 1904-5. C. Lucilii Carminum Reliquae. 2 vols. Leipzig.
    • McClure, L. 1999. Spoken like a Woman: Speech and Gender in Athenian Drama. Princeton.
    • McKeown, J. 1979. “Augustan Elegy and Mime,” PCPhS 25.71-84.
    • Miller, P. A. 1998. “The Bodily Grotesque in Roman Satire: Images of Sterility,” Arethusa 31.257-83.
    • Mras, K. 1928. “Randbemerkungen zu Lucilius' Satiren,” WS 46.78-85.
    • Newman, J. K. 1990. Roman Catullus and the Modification of the Alexandrian Sensibility. Hildesheim.
    • Nikoloutsos, K. P. 2007. “Beyond Sex: The Poetics and Politics of Pederasty in Tibullus 1.4,” Phoenix 61.55-82.
    • Oliensis, E. 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.
    • Parker, H. N. 1998. “Loyal Slaves and Loyal Wives: The Crisis of the Outsider-within and Roman exemplum Literature,” in S. Joshel & S. Murnaghan, eds., Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture. London. 152-73.
    • Panayotakis, C. 2010. Decimus Laberius: The Fragments. Cambridge.
    • Petersmann, H. 1999. “The Language of Early Roman Satire: Its Function and Characteristics,” in J. N. Adams & R. G. Mayer, eds., Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. Oxford. 289-310.
    • Plaza, M. 2000. Laughter and Derision in Petronius' Satyrica. Stockholm.
    • _____. 2006. The Function of Humour in Roman Verse Satire: Laughing and Lying. Oxford.
    • Ramsey, J. T. 2003. Cicero: Philippics I-II. Cambridge.
    • Reckford, K. J. 1999. “Only a Wet Dream? Hope and Skepticism in Horace, Satire 1.5,” AJPh 120.525- 54.
    • Revermann, M. 2006. Comic Business: Theatricality, Dramatic Technique, and Performance Contexts of Aristophanic Comedy. Oxford.
    • Richlin, A. 1992. The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. New York.
    • Roberts, P. 2013. Life and Death in Pompeii and Herculaneum. London.
    • Roman, L. 2014. Poetic Autonomy in Ancient Rome. Oxford.
    • Rosen, R. 2007. Making Mockery: The Poetics of Ancient Satire. Oxford.
    • Rudd, N. 1986. Themes in Roman Satire. London.
    • Ruffell, I. A. 2003. “Beyond Satire: Horace, Popular Invective and the Segregation of Literature,” JRS 93.35-65.
    • _____. 2011. Politics and Anti-Realism in Athenian Old Comedy: The Art of the Impossible. Oxford.
    • Schlegel, C. 2005. Satire and the Threat of Speech: Horace's Satires, Book 1. Madison, WI.
    • Schmeling, G. 2011. A Commentary on the Satyrica of Petronius [with the collaboration of A. Setaioli]. Oxford.
    • Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1967. Cicero's Letters to Atticus. Vol. 6: 44 B.C. Cambridge.
    • Sharland, S. 2010. Horace in Dialogue: Bakhtinian Readings in the Satires. Bern, Oxford & New York.
    • Steenblock, M. 2013. Sexualmoral und politische Stabilität: Zum Vorstellungszusammenhang in der römischen Literatur von Lucilius bis Ovid. Berlin & Boston.
    • Stroh, W. 2000. “Sexualität und Obszönität in römischer 'Lyrik',” in T. Stemmler & S. Horlacher, eds., Sexualität im Gedicht. Mannheim. 11-49.
    • Svarlien, J. 1989. A Study of the Ancient Testimonia on Lucilius. Ph.D Diss. Austin.
    • Terzaghi, N. 1934. Lucilio. Turin.
    • Vincent, H. 2013. “Fabula Stataria: Language and Humor in Terence,” in A. Augoustakis & A. Traill, eds., A Companion to Terence. Malden, MA. 69-88.
    • von Möllendorff, P. 1995. Grundlagen einer Ästhetik der Alten Komödie: Untersuchungen zu Aristophanes und Michail Bachtin. Tübingen.
    • Warmington, E. H. 1938. Remains of Old Latin, Vol. 3: Lucilius & The Twelve Tables. Cambridge, MA.
    • Williams, C. A. 2010. Roman Homosexuality: Ideologies of Masculinity in Classical Antiquity. 2nd ed. Oxford.
    • Ziolkowski, J. M. 1998. “Obscenity in the Latin Grammatical and Rhetorical Tradition,” in J. M. Ziolkowski, ed., Obscenity: Social Control and Artistic Creation in the European Middle Ages. Leiden. 41-59.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article