Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Perez-Arteaga, A.; Jackson, S.F.; Carrera, E.; Gaston, K.J. (2005)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
A set of priority sites for wildfowl conservation in Mexico was determined using contemporary count data (1991–2000) from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service mid-winter surveys. We used a complementarity approach implemented through linear integer programming that addresses particular conservation concerns for every species included in the analysis and large fluctuations in numbers through time.\ud \ud A set of 31 priority sites was identified, which held more than 69% of the mid-winter count total in Mexico during all surveyed years. Six sites were in the northern highlands, 12 in the central highlands, six on the Gulf of Mexico coast and seven on the upper Pacific coast. Twenty-two sites from the priority set have previously been identified as qualifying for designation as wetlands of international importance under the Ramsar Convention and 20 sites are classified as Important Areas for Bird Conservation in Mexico. The information presented here provides an accountable, spatially-explicit, numerical basis for ongoing conservation planning efforts in Mexico, which can be used to improve existing wildfowl conservation networks in the country and can also be useful for conservation planning exercises elsewhere.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abraham, K. F. & Jefferies, R. L. (1997). High goose populations: causes, impacts and implications. In Arctic ecosystems in peril: report on the arctic goose habitat working group: 7-72. Batt, B. D. (Ed.). Washington, DC and Ottawa, Ontario: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and Canadian Wildlife Service.
    • Allen, G. T., Caithamer, D. F. & Otto, M. (1999). A review of the status of greater and lesser scaup in NorthAmerica. Arlington, VA: Office of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Unpublished Report.
    • Ankney, C. D. (1996). An embarrassment of riches: too many geese. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 60: 217-223.
    • Arizmendi, M. C. & Marquez-Valdelamar, L. (2000). Areas de importancia para la conservacio´n de las aves en Me´xico. Mexico City: CONABIO.
    • Austin, J. E., Afton, A. D., Anderson, M. G., Clark, R. G., Custer, C. M., Lawrence, J. S., Pollard, J. B. & Ringelman, J. K. (2000). Declining scaup populations: issues, hypothesis, and research needs. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28: 254-263.
    • Banks, R. C. & Springer, P. F. (1994). A century of population trends of waterfowl in western North America. Stud. Av. Biol. 15: 134- 146.
    • Beauchamp, W. D., Koford, R. R., Nudds, T. D., Clark, R. G. & Johnson, D. H. (1996). Long-term declines in nest success of prairie ducks. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 60: 247-257.
    • Bellrose, F. C. (1980). Ducks, geese and swans of North America. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books.
    • BirdLife International (2000). Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge: Lynx Editions & BirdLife International.
    • Carrera, E. & de la Fuente, G. (1994). Laguna Madre. DUMAC 64: 28-31.
    • CONABIO (1997). Provincias biogeogra´ficas de Me´xico, escala 1:4,000,000. Mexico City: Comisio´n Nacional para el Uso y la Conservacio´n de la Biodiversidad.
    • Cooke, F., Francis, C. M., Cooch, E. G. & Alisauskas, R. (2000). Impact of hunting on population growth of mid-continent lesser snow geese. In Occasional Paper 102: Population modelling and management of snow geese: 17-31. Boyd, H. (Ed.). Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Wildlife Service.
    • Csuti, B., Polasky, S., Williams, P. H., Pressey, R. L., Camm, J. D., Kershaw, M., Kiester, A. R., Downs, B., Hamilton, R., Huso, M. & Sahr, K. (1997). A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biol. Conserv. 80: 83- 97.
    • Custer, C. M., Custer, T. W. & Zwank, P. J. (1997). Migration chronology and distribution of redheads on the lower Laguna Madre, Texas. Southwest. Nat. 42: 40-51.
    • Delany, S. & Scott, D. (2002). Waterbird population estimates, 3rd edn. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wetlands International.
    • Drewien, R. C., Brown, W. M. & Benning, D. S. (1996). Distribution and abundance of sandhill cranes in Mexico J. Wildl. Mgmt. 60: 270-285.
    • Ducks Unlimited (1990). SPRIG: population recovery strategy for the northern pintail. Long Grove, IL: Ducks Unlimited.
    • Ducks Unlimited (2001). Ducks Unlimited's Conservation Plan. Long Grove, IL: Ducks Unlimited.
    • Ely, C. R. & Takekawa, J. Y. (1996). Geographic variation in migratory behavior of greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons). Auk 113: 889-901.
    • Engilis, A., Oring, L. W., Carrera, E., Nelson, J. W. & Lopez, A. M. (1998). Shorebird surveys in Ensenada Pabellones and Bahia Santa Maria, Sinaloa, Mexico: critical winter habitats for Pacific flyway shorebirds. Wilson Bull. 110: 332-341.
    • Ferrier, S., Pressey, R. L. & Barrett, T. W. (2000). A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biol. Conserv. 93: 303-325.
    • Fling, P. L., Grand, J. B. & Rockwell, R. F. (1998). A model of northern pintail productivity and population growth rate. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 62: 1110-1118.
    • ILOG (1999). CPLEX 6.5. Gentilly, France: ILOG.
    • Lyons, J., Cochran, P. A., Polaco, O. J. & Merinonambo, E. (1994). Distribution and abundance of the Mexican lampreys (Petromyxontidae, Lampetra, Subgenus Tetrapleurodon). Southwest. Nat. 39: 105-113.
    • Lyons, J., Gonzalez-Hernandez, G., Soto-Galera, E. & Guzman-Arroyo, M. (1998). Decline of freshwater fishes and fisheries in selected drainages of west-central Mexico. Fisheries 23: 10-18.
    • Manomet Center for Conservation Science (2001). Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network. [online]. http://www.manomet.org/ WHSRN.htm
    • Migoya, R. & Baldasarre, G. A. (1993). Harvest and food habits of waterfowl wintering in Sinaloa, Mexico. Southwest. Nat. 38: 168-171.
    • Migoya, R. & Baldasarre, G. A. (1994). Diurnal activity budgets and habitat functions of northern pintail Anas acuta wintering in Sinaloa, Mexico. Wildfowl 45: 134-146.
    • Migoya, R. & Baldasarre, G. A. (1995). Winter survival of female northern pintails in Sinaloa, Mexico. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 59: 16-22.
    • Miller, M. R. & Duncan, D. C. (1999). The northern pintail in North America: status and conservation needs of a struggling population. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 27: 788-800.
    • Mitchell, C. A., Custer, T. W. & Zwank, P. J. (1994). Herbivory on shoalgrass by wintering redheads in Texas. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 58: 131-141.
    • NAWMP (2002). Strengthening the biological foundations: 2003 North American Waterfowl Management Plan update. [online] http://birdhabitat.fws.gov/NAWMP/images/FirstDraftforReviewby PlanStakeholdersS.pdf
    • Onuf, C. P. (1996). Biomass patterns in seagrass meadows of the Laguna Madre, Texas. Bull. Mar. Sci. 58: 404-420.
    • Ortega-Rubio, A., Castellanos-Vera, A. & Lluch-Cota, D. (1998). Sustainable development in a Mexican Biosphere Reserve: salt production in Vizcaino, Baja California (Mexico). Nat. Areas J. 18: 63-72.
    • Page, G. W., Palacios, E., Alfaro, L., Gonzalez, S., Stenzel, L. E. & Jungers, M. (1997). Numbers of wintering shorebirds in coastal wetlands of Baja California, Mexico. J. Field Ornith. 68: 562- 574.
    • Palacios, E., Alfaro, L. & Page, G. W. (1994). Distribution and abundance of breeding snowy-plovers on the Pacific coast of Baja California. J. Field Ornith. 65: 490-497.
    • Pe´rez-Arteaga, A. & Gaston, K. J. (2004). Wildfowl population trends in Mexico, 1961-2000: a basis for conservation planning. Biol. Conserv. 115: 343-355.
    • Pe´rez-Arteaga, A., Gaston, K. J. & Kershaw, M. (2002a). Undesignated sites in Mexico qualifying as wetlands of international importance. Biol. Conserv. 107: 47-57.
    • Pe´rez-Arteaga, A., Gaston, K. J. & Kershaw, M. (2002b). Population trends and priority conservation sites for Mexican Duck Anas diazi. Bird Conserv. Int. 12: 35-52.
    • Pressey, R. L., Johnson, I. R. & Wilson, P. D. (1994). Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiv. Conserv. 3: 242-262.
    • Ramsar Bureau (2002). The Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Bureau.
    • Reed, A., Stehn, R. H. & Ward, D. (1989). Autumn use of Izembek Lagoon, Alaska, by brant from different areas. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 53: 720-725.
    • Rodrigues, A. S., Cerdeira, J. O. & Gaston, K. J. (2000). Flexibility, efficiency, and accountability: adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problems. Ecography 23: 565-574 Scott, D. A. & Carbonell, M. (1986). A directory of neotropical wetlands. Cambridge and Slimbridge, UK: International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources & Waterfowl Research Bureau.
    • SEMARNAT (2002). Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL-2001, Proteccio´n ambiental-especies nativas de Me´xico de flora y fauna silvestres-categor´ıas de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusio´n, exclusio´n o cambio-lista de especies en riesgo. Me´xico City: Diario Oficial de la Federacio´n.
    • Soto-Galera, E., Paulo-Maya, J., Lopez-Lopez, E., Serna-Hernandez, J. A. & Lyons, J. (1999). Change in fish fauna as indication of aquatic ecosystem condition in Rio Grande de Morelia-Lago de Cuitzeo Basin, Mexico. Env. Mgmt. 24: 133-140.
    • Stroud, D. A., Mudge, G. P. & Pienkowski, M. W. (1990). Protecting internationally important bird sites: a review of the EEC special protection area network in Great Britain. Peterborough, UK: Nature Conservancy Council.
    • USDI (1994). 1994 update to the North American Waterfowl Management Plan: expanding the commitment. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
    • USDI (1997). Mexico Winter Waterfowl Counts. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of the Interior.
    • USFWS (2001). Waterfowl population status, 2001. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of the Interior.
    • Ward, D. H. (1983). The relationship of two seagrasses, Zostera marina and Ruppia maritima, to the black brant, Branta bernicla nigricans, San Ignacio Lagoon, Baja California, Mexico. MSc Thesis: Eugene, University of Oregon.
    • Ward, D. H., Rexstad, E. A., Sedinger, J. S., Lindberg, M. S. & Dawe, N. K. (1997). Seasonal and annual survival of adult Pacific brant. J. Wildl. Mgmt 61: 773-781.
    • Wilkins, K. A., Otto, M. C. & Garrettson, P. R. (2001). Trends in duck breeding populations, 1955-2001. Arlington, VA: Office of Migratory Bird Management. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Unpublished Report.
    • Williams, B. K., Koneff, M. D. & Smith, D. A. (1999). Evaluation of waterfowl conservation under the North American Waterfowl Management Plan. J. Wildl. Mgmt 63: 417-440.
    • Williams, S. O. III. (1980). The Mexican duck in Mexico: natural history, distribution, and population status. PhD Thesis: Fort Collins, Colorado State University.
    • Wilson, U. W. & Atkinson, J. R. (1995). Black brant and spring-staging use at two Washington coastal areas in relation to eelgrass abundance. Condor 97: 91-98.
    • Wilson, M. H. & Ryan, D. G. (1997). Conservation of Mexican wetlands: role of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25: 57-64.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok