Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

This paper reports findings from a study of support provided by non-school-based mentors of secondary science teachers in England. It focuses on the identity development of beginning teachers of physics, some of the recipients of the mentoring. Drawing on the analysis of interview and case study data, and utilising third space theory, the authors show how external mentors (experienced, subject specialist teachers who were not based in the same schools as the teachers they were supporting) facilitated opportunities for mentees to negotiate and shape their professional identities, and made valuable contributions to three distinct and important aspects of beginning teachers’ identity development. The paper argues that non-judgemental support from external mentors enhances beginner teachers’ professional learning and identity development through the creation of a discursive ‘third’ space in which mentees are able to openly discuss professional learning and development needs, discuss alternatives to performative norms and take risks in classrooms. Opportunities for beginner teachers to engage in such activities are often restricted in and by the current climate of schooling and teacher education within England.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Asada, T. 2012. “Mentoring Novice Teachers in Japanese Schools.” International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education 1 (1): 54-65.
    • Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215-228.
    • Beauchamp, C., and L. Thomas. 2009. “Understanding Teacher Identity: An Overview of Issues in the Literature and Implications for Teacher Education.” Cambridge Journal of Education 39: 175-189.
    • Beck, C., and C. Kosnik. 2000. “Associate Teachers in Pre-Service Education: Clarifying and Enhancing Their Role.” Journal of Education for Teaching 26 (3): 207-224.
    • Beijaard, D., P. Meijer, and N. Verloop. 2004. “Reconsidering Research on Teachers' Professional Identity.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20: 107-128.
    • Beijaard, D., N. Verloop, and J. D. Vermunt. 2000. “Teachers' Perceptions of Professional Identity: An Exploratory Study from a Personal Knowledge Perspective.” Teaching and Teacher Education 16 (7): 749-764.
    • Bell, D., and R. Klein, eds. 1996. Radically Speaking: Feminism Reclaimed. Melbourne: Spinifex Press.
    • Bhabha, H. 1990. “The Third Space: Interview with Homi Bhabha.” In Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by J. Rutherford, 207-221. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
    • Bhabha, H. K. 1994. The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.
    • Bradbury, L. 2010. “Educative Mentoring: Promoting Reform-based Science Teaching Through Mentoring Relationships.” Science Teacher Education 94 (6): 1049-1071.
    • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77-101.
    • BERA (British Educational Research Association ). 2011. Guidelines for Ethical Research. London: British Educational Research Association.
    • Bullough, R. V. 2012. “Mentoring and New Teacher Induction in the United States: A Review and Analysis of Current Practices.” Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 20 (1): 57-74.
    • Crasborn, F., P. Hennissen, N. Brouwer, F. Korthagen, and T. Bergen. 2008. “Promoting Versatility in Mentor Teachers' Use of Supervisory Skills.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 499-514.
    • Danielsson, A. T., and P. Warwick. 2014. “'You Have to Give Them Some Science Facts': Primary Student Teachers' Early Negotiations of Teacher Identities in the Intersections of Discourses about Science Teaching and about Primary Teaching.” Research in Science Education 44: 289-305.
    • Day, C., P. Sammons, G. Stobart, A. Kington, and Q. Gu. 2007. Teachers Matter: Connecting Lives, Work and Effectiveness. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    • DfE (Department for Education). 2010. The Schools White Paper: The Importance of Teaching. London: HMSO.
    • DfE (Department for Education). 2011. HC 1515 Attracting, Training and Retaining the Best Teachers, Written Evidence. Accessed August 3, 2012. http://www.publications.parlia ment.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmeduc/writev/1515/att22.htm
    • DfE (Department for Education). 2012a. Induction for Newly Qualified Teachers (England): Guidance for Appropriate Bodies, Local Authorities, Head Teachers, School Staff and Governing Bodies. London: HMSO.
    • DfE (Department for Education). 2012b. Teachers' Standards. Accessed October 2, 2012. https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/teachers%20standards.pdf DfE (Department for Education) and TA (The Teaching Agency). (2012). Subject Knowledge Enhancement Courses. Accessed May 31, 2012. http://www.education.gov.uk/get-intoteaching/subjects-age-groups/age-groups/teaching-secondary/boost-subject-knowledge/skecourses.aspx
    • Dingwall, R. 1997. “Accounts, Interviews and Observations.” In Context and Method in Qualitative Research, edited by G. Miller and R. Dingwall, 51-66. London: SAGE.
    • Edwards, A. 1998. “Mentoring Student Teachers in Primary Schools: Assisting Student Teachers to Become Learners.” European Journal of Teacher Education 21 (1): 47-62.
    • Fox, K. (2010). '''Belonging' as a Subject Specialist: Challenging the Barriers.” Tean Journal 1(2) December [Online]. Accessed 28th October 2013. http://bit.ly/tyfJ5 M
    • Gee, J. P. 2000. “Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education.” In Review of Research in Education 25 (2000-2001), edited by W. G. Secada, 99-125. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
    • Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1994. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 105-117. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Gutierrez, K. (1995). “Script, Counterscript, and Underlife in the Urban Classroom: Constructing a Third Space.” Paper presented at the Fourth International Literacy and Education Research Network Conference on Learning, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
    • Gutiérrez, K. 2008. “Developing a Sociocritical Literacy in the Third Space.” Reading Research Quarterly 43 (2): 148-164.
    • Hall, S. 2000. “Who Needs 'identity'?” In Identity: A Reader, edited by P. Du Gay, J. Evans, and P. Redman, 15-31. London: Sage.
    • Hamilton, L. C. 2010. “Teachers, Narrative Identity and Ability Constructs: Exploring Dissonance and Consensus in Contrasting School Systems.” Research Papers in Education 25 (4): 409-431.
    • Hammersley, M. 1996. “The Relationship between Qualitative and Quantitative Research: Paradigm Loyalty versus Methodological Eclecticism.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences, edited by J. T. E. Richardson, 159-174. Leicester: British Psychological Society.
    • Hargreaves, A. 2001. “Emotional Geographies of Teaching.” Teachers' College Record 103: 1056-1080.
    • Helms, J. V. 1998. “Science and Me: Subject Matter and Identity in Secondary School Science Teachers.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35 (7): 811-834.
    • Hillier, J., J. de Winter, and J. Twidle. 2013. “I Could Enjoy Teaching: The Case of Physics.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 13 (3): 287-302.
    • Hobbs, L. 2012. “Examining the Aesthetic Dimensions of Teaching: Relationships Between Teacher Knowledge, Identity and Passion.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (5): 718-727.
    • Hobbs, L. 2013. “Teaching 'Out-of-Field' as a Boundary-crossing Event: Factors Shaping Teacher Identity.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11: 271-297.
    • Hobson, A. J. 2010. “On Being Bottom of the Pecking Order: Beginner Teachers' Perceptions and Experiences of Support.” Teacher Development 13 (4): 299-320.
    • Hobson, A. J., P. Ashby, A. Malderez, and P. D. Tomlinson. 2009. “Mentoring Beginning Teachers: What We Know and What We Don't.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (1): 207-216.
    • Hobson, A. J., and A. Malderez. 2013. “Judgementoring and Other Threats to Realizing the Potential of School-based Mentoring in Teacher Education.” International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education 2 (2): 89-108.
    • Hobson, A. J., A. Malderez, L. Tracey, M. S. Giannakaki, G. Pell, and P. D. Tomlinson. 2008. “Student Teachers' Experiences of Initial Teacher Preparation in England: Core Themes and Variation.” Research Papers in Education 23 (4): 407-433.
    • Hobson, A. J., and J. McIntyre. 2013. “Teacher Fabrication as an Impediment to Professional Learning and Development: The External Mentor Antidote.” Oxford Review of Education 39 (3): 345-365.
    • Hobson, A. J., J. McIntyre, P. Ashby, V. Hayward, A. Stevens, and A. Malderez. 2012. The Nature, Impact and Potential of External Mentoring for Teachers of Physics and Other Subjects in England. London: Gatbsy Charitable Foundation.
    • Hobson, A. J., and A. J. Townsend. 2010. “Interviewing as Educational Research Method (S).” In Educational Research and Inquiry: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, edited by D. Hartas, 223-238. London: Continuum.
    • Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Is There Really a Teacher Shortage? Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy and The Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
    • Jenkinson, K., K. Turner, C. Lambley, and D. James. 2011. Evaluation of the Stimulating Physics Network: Final Report for the Institute of Physics and National Science Learning Centre. York: Babcock Research.
    • Johnson, S., J. Berg, and M. Donaldson. 2005. Who Stays in Teaching and Why: A Review of the Literature on Teacher Retention. The Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. Harvard: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
    • Kelchtermans, G., K. Ballet, and L. Piot. 2009. “Surviving Diversity in times of Performativity: Understanding Teachers' Emotional Experience of Change.” In Advances in Teacher Emotion Research: The Impact on Teachers' Lives, edited by P. A. Schutz and M. Zembylas, 215-232. New York: Springer.
    • Lasky, S. 2005. “A Sociocultural Approach to Understanding Teacher Identity, Agency and Professional Vulnerability in a Context of Secondary School Reform.” Teaching and Teacher Education 21: 899-916.
    • Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1990. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Law, L. 1997. “Dancing on the Bar: Sex, Money and the Uneasy Politics of Third Space.” In Geographies of Resistance, edited by M. Keith and S. Pile, 107-123. London: Routledge.
    • Leaton Gray, S. (2006). Teachers under Siege. Stoke: Trentham Books.
    • Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Lindgren, U. 2005. “Experiences of Beginning Teachers in a School‐based Mentoring Program in Sweden.” Educational Studies 31 (3): 251-263.
    • Lingard, B. 1995. Re-Articulating Relevant Voices in Reconstructing Teacher Education. The Annual Harry Penny Lecture, University of South Australia, Adelaide.
    • Long, J. 1997. “The Dark Side of Mentoring.” The Australian Educational Researcher 24 (2): 115-133.
    • Lopez-Real, F., and T. Kwan. 2005. “Mentors' Perceptions of Their Own Professional Development during Mentoring.” Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy 31 (1): 15-24.
    • Lovett, S., and R. Davey. 2009. “Being a Secondary English Teacher in New Zealand: Complex Realities in the First 18 Months.” Professional Development in Education 35 (4): 547-566.
    • Luehmann, A. 2007. “Identity Development as a Lens to Science Teacher Preparation.” Science Education 91 (5): 82-839.
    • Lumby, J. 2009. “Performativity and Identity: Mechanisms of Exclusion.” Journal of Education Policy 24 (3): 353-369.
    • Mahony, P., I. Menter, and I. Hextall. 2004. “The Emotional Impact of Performance-related Pay on Teachers in England.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (3): 435-456.
    • Martin, S. D., J. L. Snow, and C. A. Franklin Torrez. 2011. “Navigating the Terrain of Third Space: Tensions with/in Relationships in School-university Partnerships.” Journal of Teacher Education 62 (3): 299-311.
    • McNally, J., and A. Blake. 2012. “Miss, What's My Name? New Teacher Identity as a Question of Reciprocal Ontological Security.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 44: 196-211.
    • Miles, M. B., and M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: SAGE.
    • Moje, E. B., K. M. Ciechanowski, K. Kramer, L. Ellis, R. Carrillo, and T. Collazo. 2004. “Working Toward Third Space in Content Area Literacy: An Examination of Everyday Funds of Knowledge and Discourse.” Reading Research Quarterly 39 (1): 38-70.
    • Moor, H., M. Jones, F. Johnson, K. Martin, E. Cowell, and C. Bojke. 2006. Mathematics and Science in Secondary Schools: The Deployment of Teachers and Support Staff to Deliver the Curriculum, DfES Research Report 708. Nottingham: DfES.
    • Osborne, J., and J. Dillon. 2008. Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
    • Parry, B. (1994). Signs of Our times: Discussion of Homi Bhabha's the Location of Culture. Third Text 8 (28-29): 5-24.
    • Pearce, J., and C. Morrison. 2011. “Teacher Identity and Early Career Resilience: Exploring the Links.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 36 (1): 47-57.
    • Postlethwaite, K., and L. Haggarty. 2012. “Student Teachers' Thinking About Learning to Teach: A Study of Student Teachers of Mathematics and Science at the End of Their Initial Training.” Research Papers in Education 27 (3): 263-284.
    • Rajuan, M., D. Beijaard, and N. Verloop. 2010. “The Match and Mismatch Between Expectations of Student Teachers and Cooperating Teachers: Exploring Different Opportunities for Learning to Teach in the Mentor Relationship.” Research Papers in Education 25 (2): 201-223.
    • Roth, W. M. 2008. “Bricolage, Métissage, Hybridity, Heterogeneity, Diaspora: Concepts for Thinking Science Education in the 21st Century.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 3 (4): 891-916.
    • Ruohotie-Lyhty, M. 2013. “Struggling for a Professional Identity: Two Newly Qualified Language Teachers' Identity Narratives During the First Years at Work.” Teaching and Teacher Education 30: 120-129.
    • Sachs, J. 2005. “Teacher Education and the Development of Professional Identity: Learning to Be a Teacher.” In Connecting Policy and Practice: Challenges for Teaching and Learning in Schools and Universities, edited by P. Denicolo and M. Kompf, 5-21. Oxford: Routledge.
    • Sahlberg, P. 2010. “Rethinking Accountability in a Knowledge Society.” Journal of Educational Change 11: 45-61.
    • Saka, Y., S. A. Southerland, J. Kittleson, and T. Hutner. 2013. “Understanding the Induction of a Science Teacher: The Interaction of Identity and Context.” Research in Science Education 43: 1221-1244.
    • Scott, P., and J. Ryder. 2007. Physics Enhancement Project (PEP) Evaluation: Final Report. Leeds: University of Leeds.
    • Settlage, J., S. A. Southerland, L. K. Smith, and R. Ceglie. 2009. “Constructing a Doubt-Free Teaching Self: Self Efficacy, Teacher Identity, and Science Instruction Within Diverse Settings.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (1): 102-125.
    • Shepherd, C. 2008. “Towards Physics: Training Programmes for Non-Specialists.” School Science Review 89: 328-334.
    • Smith, T., and R. Ingersoll. 2004. “What are the Effects of Induction and Mentoring on Beginning Teacher Turnover?” American Educational Research Journal 41 (3): 681-714.
    • Smithers, A., and P. Robinson. 2008. Physics in School IV: Supply and Retention of Teachers. Buckingham: Carmichael Press.
    • Soja, E. W. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Su, J. J. 2011. Imagination and the Contemporary Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sullivan, H. S. 1953. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: W.W. Norton.
    • Talbert, J. E., and M. W. Mclaughlin. 2002. “Professional Communities and the Artisan Model of Teaching.” Teachers and Teaching 8 (3): 325-343.
    • Taylor, M., E. J. Klein, and L. Abrams. 2014. “Tensions of Reimagining Our Roles as Teacher Educators in a Third Space: Revisiting a Co/Autoethnography through a Faculty Lens.” Studying Teacher Education 10 (1): 3-19.
    • Tomlinson, P. D. 1989. “Having it Both Ways: Hierarchical Focusing as Research Interview Method.” British Educational Research Journal 15 (2): 155-176.
    • Tomlinson, P. D. 1995. Understanding Mentoring: Reflective Strategies for School-based Teacher Preparation. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Trent, J. 2013. “From Campus to Classroom: A Critical Perspective on Approximations of Practice in Teacher Education.” Research Papers in Education 28 (5): 571-594.
    • Ulvik, M., and E. Sunde. 2013. “The Impact of Mentor Education: Does Mentor Education Matter?” Professional Development in Education 39 (5): 754-770.
    • Wang, J., and S. J. Odell. 2002. “Mentored Learning to Teach According to Standards-based Reform: A Critical Review.” Review of Educational Research 72 (3): 481-546.
    • Williams, J. 2014. “Teacher Educator Professional Learning in the Third Space: Implications for Identity and Practice.” Journal of Teacher Education 65 (4): 315-326.
    • Wilson, R. E., and J. Kittleson. 2012. “The Role of Struggle in Pre-Service Elementary Teachers' Experiences as Students and Approaches to Facilitating Science Learning.” Research in Science Education 42: 709-728.
    • Zeichner, K. 2010. “Rethinking the Connections Between Campus Courses and Field Experiences in College- and University-based Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education 61 (1-2): 89-99.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article