LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: 2719, 2739
Objectives: To explore some of the key assumptions underpinning the continued development of general practitioner-led commissioning in health services. Methods: Qualitative data from two studies of service improvement in the English NHS were considered against England's plans for GP-led commissioning. These data were collected through in-depth interviews with a total of 187 professionals and 99 people affected by services in 10 different primary care trust areas across England between 2008 and 2009. Results: Internationally, GPs are seen to have a central position in health systems. In keeping with this, the English policy places emphasis on the 'pivotal role' of general practitioners, considered to be ideally placed to commission in the best interests of their patients. However, our evidence suggests that general practitioners do not always have a pivotal role for all patients. Moreover, it is planned that the new commissioning groups in England will not be subject to top-down performance management and this raises the question of how agreed quality standards will be met under the proposed new system. Conclusions: This paper questions the assumption that GPs are best placed to commission health services in a way that meets quality standards and leads to equitable outcomes. There is little evidence to suggest that GPs will succeed where others have failed and a risk that, without top-down performance management, service improvement will be patchy, leading to greater, not reduced, inequity.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 2. Boerma W. Coordination and integration in European primary care. In Primary care in the dri ean primary care, Saltman R., Rico A., Boerma W. (eds). OU: Maidenhead, 2006
    • 3. WHO. The World Health Report - Primary Health Care (Now More Than Ever). World Health Organisation, 2008
    • 4. Department of Health. Government response to the NHS Future Forum report. London: Department of Health, 2011
    • 9. House of Commons Health Committee. Commissioning: Fourth report of session 2009-2010. London: Stationary Office, 2010
    • 10. Department of Health and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Health reform evaluation programme: Evaluating the NHS reforms, what have we learnt so far? London: Department of Health, 2010
    • 11. Abbott S., Procter S and Iacovou N. NHS purchaser provider relationships in England and Wales: the view from primary care. Social Policy & Administration 2009;43:(1):1-14.
    • 12. Propper C., Sutton M., Whitnall C. and targets and terror reduce waiting times in England for hospital care? Berkeley Electronic Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 2008;2:5
    • 13. Connolly S., Bevan G. and Mays N. Funding and performance of healthcare systems in the four countries of the UK before and after devolution. London: Nuffield Trust, 2009
    • 14. Willcox S., Seddon M., Dunn M., Tudor Edwards R., Pearse J. and Tu JV. Measuring and reducing waiting times: a cross-national comparison of strategies. Health Affairs 2007;26:1078-87
    • 15. Bevan G. and the English public health care system. Public Administration 2006;84:517-38
    • 17. Lourenco T., Grant A., Burr J. and Vale L. Local decisionnational guidance on interventional procedures in the UK. Journal Health Service Research & Policy 2010;15:(2):3-11
    • 18. Thorlby R., Rosen R. and Smith J. (2011) GP commissioning: insights from medical groups in the United States. The Nuffield Trust
    • 19. Secretaries of State. Working for patients. London: Stationery Office, 1989
    • 20. NHS Executive. Developing NHS purchasing and GP fundholding. Towards a primary care-led NHS. EL 1994;(94)79. Leeds: NHSE
    • 21. Department of Health. Practice based commissioning: engaging practices in commissioning. London: Department of Health, 2004
    • 22. Wyke S., Mays N., Street A., Bevan G., McLeod H. and Goodwin N. Should general practitioners purchase health care for their patients? The total purchasing experiment in Britain. Health Policy 2003;65:243-59
    • 23. Audit Commission. Putting commissioning into practice; implementing practice based commissioning through good financial management. London: Audit Commission, 2007
    • 24. Curry N., Goodwin N., Naylor C. and Robertson R. Practice-based commissioning: reinvigorate, replace or abandon? London: King's Fund, 2008
    • 25. Coleman A., Checkland K., Harrison S. and Dowswell G. Practice-based commissioning: theory, implementation and outcome: final report. Manchester: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, 2009
    • 26. Mannion R. General practitioner-led commissioning in the NHS: progress, prospects and pitfalls. British Medical Bulletin 2011;97:7-15
    • 31. Ritchie J. The applications of qualitative methods to social research. In Ritchie J. and Lewis J. (eds) Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage, 2003
    • 32. Department of Health. Supporting people with long term conditions: An NHS and social care model to support local innovation and integration. London: Department of Health, 2005
    • 33. Department of Health. Autumn performance report. London: Department of Health, 2005
    • 34. Department of Health. Autumn performance report. London: Department of Health, 2008
    • 35. Department of Health. The NHS Outcomes Framework 2011/12. London: Department of Health, 2010
    • 36. Sell S. and Bostock N. Quality premium removed from Bill but not scrapped. GPonline, 2011 http://www.gponline.com/channel/news/article/1076183/qualitypremium-removed-bill-not-scrapped/ [accessed 26/06/11]
    • 37. Smith J., Mays N., Dixon J. et al. A review of the effectiveness of primary care-led commissioning and its place in the NHS. London: The Health Foundation, 2004
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article