LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: DA, HT, HV
Drunkenness assumed increasing importance as a ‘problem’ in the discourses of the nineteenth century. This is a bottom-up study to examine the extent to which the policing of drunkenness was informed by local cultures, rather than directed by policies imposed from above. Drink related offences formed the largest category of charges coming before the courts, and constituted a significant part of the offending dealt with by police. This paper examines how the police in Cumbria managed drunkenness from 1874 to 1900. It uses the primary sources of the police and the courts, looking particularly at Kirkby Stephen and Kirkby Lonsdale, to show how local cultures shaped the praxis of policing. After 1860, temperance was the norm for Methodists and non-conformists, who increasingly defined pub culture as incompatible with respectability. It has been possible to assess the impact of temperance and Methodism upon the policing of drunkenness by comparing the data on arrests and summonses. The analysis of this data shows that differences of rates of arrest in the these locations are best explained by the influence of local cultures upon policing, rather than different patterns of drinking or policies imposed from above.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article