LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: R
Introduction: In order to enable fast treatment response to anaphylactic reactions, adrenaline auto-injectors (AAI) have been developed and manufactured. It has been reported in several studies that administration technique is suboptimal. The primary purpose of this study was to review the nature and extent of the deficiencies in administration technique among patients, parents/caregivers and healthcare professionals.\ud \ud Methods: Relevant publications were identified between 1998 and 2015 using two search methods: a keyword search in Embase, PubMed, British Nursing Index and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and a search of reference lists of relevant articles.\ud \ud Results: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 37% of patients, 32% of parents/caregivers and 21% of healthcare professionals demonstrated correct administration technique. For studies which employed a before-and-after training study design, correct technique was achieved in 77% of patients, 79% of caregivers and 65% of healthcare professionals. The most consistently observed error was the failure to hold the device in place for the recommended time. For patients, factors associated with good technique were being aged over 18 years, trained in AAI administration by an allergist, prescribed an AAI for more than 30 months, having a history of severe anaphylaxis and membership of a support group. For parents/caregivers in addition to those mentioned, being given a training device with which to practice, improved technique.\ud \ud Discussion: There was wide variation in administration techniques reported. However, studies designed using before-and-after training show that even a brief demonstration and educational intervention can improve technique. Further studies are required to design and pilot acceptable and cost-effective educational materials.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 9. Sabroe RA, Glendinning AK, Sabroe I, Lawlor F, Kobza Black A. An audit of the use of selfadministered adrenaline syringes in patients with angio-oedema. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146(4):615-20.
    • 10. Kapoor S, Roberts G, Bynoe Y, Gaughan M, Habibi P, Lack G. Influence of a multidisciplinary paediatric allergy clinic on parental knowledge and rate of subsequent allergic reactions. Allergy. 2004;59(2):185-91.
    • 11. Arkwright PD, Farragher AJ. Factors determining the ability of parents to effectively administer intramuscular adrenaline to food allergic children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006;17(3):227-9.
    • 12. Huang S. Evaluating the Results of Teaching Epinephrine Auto-Injector Use in An Allergy Clinic. Pediatric Asthma, Allergy & Immunology. 2007;20(1): 19-22.
    • 13. Diwakar L, Heslegrave J, Richter AG et al. Self-injectable adrenaline devices: is training necessary? J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2010;20(5):452-3.
    • 14. Jones C, Llewellyn C, Frew A, Toit G, Mukhopadhyay S & Smith H. Factors associated with good adherence to self-care behaviours amongst adolescents with food allergy. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2015;26:111-118.
    • 15. Umasunthar T, Procktor A, Hodes M, et al. Patients' ability to treat anaphylaxis using adrenaline autoinjectors: a randomized controlled trial, Allergy. 2015;70:855-863.
    • 16. Huang S. A survey of Epi-PEN use in patients with a history of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;102(3):525-6.
    • 17. Grouhi M, Alshehri M, Hummel D, Roifman CM. Anaphylaxis and epinephrine auto-injector training: who will teach the teachers? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104(1):190-3.
    • 18. Sicherer SH, Forman JA, Noone SA. Use assessment of self-administered epinephrine among food-allergic children and paediatricians. Pediatr. 2000;105(2):359-62.
    • 19. Al-Matar H and Sussman GL. Use assessment of self-administered epinephrine devices among patients with anaphylactic reactions. Can J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;6:8-9.
    • 20. Kim JS, Sinacore JM, Pongracic JA. Parental use of EpiPen for children with food allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116(1):164-8.
    • 33. Brown JC, Tuuri RE, Akhter S, Guerra LD, Goodman IS, Myers SR, Nozicka C, Manzi S, Long Kapoor et al., 2004 Arga et al., 2011 Segal et al., 2012 Sicherer et al., 2012 Umasunthar et al., 2015 3 months 6 months First follow-up visit after 0.04- 6.54 years (mean 1.28 years) 6 weeks and 12 months Post-instruction (second visit) 68%
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article