Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Maon, François; Swaen, Valérie; Lindgreen, Adam (2017)
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Languages: English
Types: Article
This comparative study explores 499 corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives implemented by 178 corporations in five distinct, institutionally consistent European clusters. This study provides an empirically grounded response to calls to develop comprehensive, nuanced pictures of CSR in the composite European business environment. In so doing, the article stresses three distinct, non-exclusive approaches that characterize the embedding of CSR considerations in corporations’ strategies across Europe and the CSR challenges for corporations operating in different socio-political contexts. Furthermore, the study reaffirms the CSR notion as a contextualized concept, shaped by socio-political drivers, and contributes by bridging macro-level, socio-political facets of CSR with its meso-level, organizational implications.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions, available at http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/files/csr/newcsr/act_en.pdf (last access on July 27, 2015).
    • Fiss, P.C., & Zajac, E.J. (2004). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4): 501-534.
    • Fleming, P., & Jones, M. (2013). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. London: Sage.
    • Fortanier, F., Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2011). Harmonization in CSR reporting: MNEs and global CSR standards. Management International Review, 51(5): 665-696.
    • Frederick, W.C. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: deep roots, flourishing growth, promising future. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 522-531). Oxford: Oxford University Press,
    • García-Rosell, J.-C. (2013). Struggles over corporate social responsibility meanings in teaching practices: The case of hybrid problem-based learning. Management Learning, 44(5): 537- 555.
    • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2): 51-71.
    • Gond, J-P., Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2011). The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society, 40(4), 640- 671.
    • Grayson, D., & Hodges, A. (2004). Corporate social opportunity! 7 steps to make corporate social responsibility work for your business. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
    • Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., & Schmidpeter, R. (2004). Corporate social responsibility across Europe. Berlin: Springer.
    • Hall, P.A., & Soskice, D. (2001), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Hart, S., & Milstein, M. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2): 56-69.
    • Hartman, L., Rubin, R., & Dhanda, K. (2007). The communication of corporate social responsibility: United States and European Union multinational corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4): 373-89.
    • Hess, D., Rogovsky, N., &Dunfee, T.W. (2002). The next wave of corporate community involvement: Corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 44(2): 110-125.
    • Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2011). Corporate social strategy: Stakeholder engagement and competitive advantage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Idowu, S., Schmidpeter, R., & Fifka, M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in Europe: United in sustainable diversity. Berlin: Springer.
    • Illia, L., Romenti, S., &Zyglidopoulos, S. (2010). CSR Disclosure Communication Exploring European Cross-National Differences and Tendencies. Madrid: IE School of Communication.
    • Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9): 834-864.
    • Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3): 371-394.
    • Katzenstein, P.J. (1985). Small states in world markets. Industrial policy in Europe. London: Cornell University Press.
    • Kjaer, L., Abrahamson, P., & Raynard, P. (2003). Local partnerships in Europe. An action research project. Copenhagen: The Copenhagen Centre.
    • Koleva, P., Rodet-Kroichvili, N., David, P., & Marasova, J. (2010). Is corporate social responsibility the privilege of developed market economies? Some evidence from Central 35
    • Schmitter, P.C. (1981). Interest, intermediation and regime governability in contemporary Western Europe and North America. In S. Berger. (ed.), Pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics (pp. 285-327). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Smith, N.C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4): 52-76.
    • Steurer, R. (2010). The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Characterising public policies on CSR in Europe, Policy Sciences, 43(1): 49-72.
    • Steurer, R., Martinuzzi, A., & Margula, S. (2012). Public policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, instruments, and regional differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(4): 206-27.
    • Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., & Hockerts, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia: An overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1): 1-15.
    • Venn, S. Todd, L.R., & Pendleton, J. (2010). Public relations leadership in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3): 403-423.
    • Vogel, D. (1992). “The globalization of business ethics: Why America remains different”. California Management Review, 35(1): 30-49.
    • Vogel, D. (2006). The market for virtue: The potential and limits for corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    • Votaw, D. (1973). Genius becomes rare. In D. Votaw, & S.P. Sethi (eds.). The corporate dilemma: Traditional values versus contemporary problems (pp. 11-45). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    • Waldman, D.A., Sully de Luque, M. Washburn, N., House, R.J., Bolanle, A, Barrasa, A., Bobina, M., Bodur, M., Chen, Y-J., Debbarma, S., Dorfman, P., Dzuvichu, R.R., Evcimen, I., Fu, P., Grachev, M., Gonzalez Duarte, R., Gupta, V., Den Hartog, D.N., de Hoogh, A.H.B., Howell, J., Jone, K-Y., Kabasakal, H., Konrad, E., Koopman, P.L., Lang, R., Lin , C-C., Liu, J., Martinez, B., Munley, A.E., Papalexandris, N., Peng, T.K., Prieto, L., Quigley, 39
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article