Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Barnes, Jake Peter (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: HC0079.E5
It is widely acknowledged that existing low carbon technologies offer substantial means to reduce the carbon intensity of existing lifestyles. Yet the problem is not simply one of diffusion: commercially developed technologies need to be made to work in diverse local contexts of use. They need to be locally embedded. I approach the study of ‘local embedding’ through a particular actor, community-led energy initiatives and the broad research question: how are community-led energy initiatives seeking to integrate sustainable technologies into local contexts of use? I explore the agency of community activists to locally embed technologies and the context dynamics influencing how their projects develop.\ud \ud In doing so, I identify a gap in current knowledge between the social embedding of technology by wider society (as conceptualised by sustainability transitions research) and the appropriation of technology by users (as conceptualised by domestication studies) and develop the concept of local embedding as a distinct conceptual contribution. Having identified community initiatives as performing a largely intermediary role I draw on insights from research on innovation intermediaries to understand their agency. A framework is constructed through building blocks from these approaches, then tested and refined through four comparative case studies on community attempts at local embedding.\ud \ud The research contributes a novel process model on community-based intermediation for local embedding. I identify an ideal-typical sequence to key community-based intermediary processes and identify a variety of context dynamics influencing project development. As such I contribute to current discussions within (a) sustainability transitions research, about actors and their agency, and (b) innovation intermediaries research, identifying an under-studied intermediary working at the user-end of innovation processes and refine an existing framework on key intermediary processes.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abbott, A. (1984) Event Sequence and Event Duration: Colligation and Measurement, Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 17(4), 192-204
    • Abbott, A. (1992) From Causes to Events: Notes on Narrative Positivism. Sociological Methods & Research, 20(4), 428-455.
    • Abell, P (1987) The syntax of social life: the theory and method of comparative narratives, Oxford, Clarendon Press, UK
    • Aitken, M. (2010) Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities, Energy Policy, 38, 6066-6075
    • Arthur, W., (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events, The Economics Journal. 99, 116-131.
    • Backhaus, J. (2010) Intermediaries as Innovating Actors in the Transition to a Sustainable Energy System. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), 86-108.
    • Backhaus, A. J., Mourik, R., & Breukers, S. (2010) Learning in single & double loops - interaction as key to scientific & practical insights. Draft paper presented to EASST conference 2010
    • Banks, N., & White, V. (2012) Evaluation of solid wall insulation in fuel poor households in the private sector Final Report to Eaga Charitable Trust. Bristol, UK.
    • BASIC. (2012) BASIC Lockleaze Quotation, June 2012. Internal project document Bristol Power
    • BCC. (2009) The Community's vision for Lockleaze, Bristol, UK
    • Berker, T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y., & Ward, K. (Eds.) (2006) Domestication of media and technology. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK
    • Berkhout, F. (2002) Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 12, 1-4.
    • Bernardi, M. Ferralis, N. Wan, J. H. Villalon, R. & Grossman, J. C. (2012) 'Solar energy generation in three dimensions' Energy & Environmental Science, 5(5), 6880- 6884
    • Bessant, J., Rush, H., (1995) Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer. Research Policy 24, 97-114.
    • BPC. (2011a) Outline Proposal, May 2011, Internal project document Bristol Power
    • BPC. (2012) Share Offer Prospectus, 29th October. Bristol Power Cooperative [Online] Available from www.bristolpower.coop [Accessed 20/01/2013]
    • BPCIC. (2012) Application to Local Energy Assessment Funds, 23rd Jan. 2012, Internal project document Bristol Power
    • Breukers, S., Heiskanen, E., Mourik, R. M., Bauknecht, D., Hodson, M., Barabanova, Y., Brohmann, B., Bürger, V., Feenstra, C., Jalas, M., Johnson, M., Maier, P., Marvin, S., Meinel, H., Pariag, J., Rask, M., Rinne, S., Robinson, S., Saastamoinen, M., Salminen, J., Valuntiené, I., Vadovics, E. (2009). Deliverable 5 :Integration scheme for successful energy demand side management.  [Online] Available at http://www.energychange.info/deliverables/192-d6-conceptualframework-and-model-synthesis-report-for-policy-makers [Accessed 03/04/2014]
    • Breukers, S. C., Heiskanen, E., Brohmann, B., Mourik, R. M., & Feenstra, C. F. J. (2011). Connecting research to practice to improve energy demand-side management (DSM). Energy, 36(4), 2176-2185.
    • Bristol Post (2012a) Solar panelled tree to be built in Brislington [Online] June 20th Available at www.bristolpost.co.uk/Solar-panelled-tree-built-Brislington/story16419032-detail/story.html [Accessed 25/06/12]
    • Brohmann, B., Feenstra, Y., Heiskanen, E., Hodson, M., Mourik, R., & Raven, R. (2007) Factors influencing the societal acceptance of new energy technologies: Metaanalysis of recent european projects. Paper presented at European Roundtable for Sustainable Consumption and Production, Basel, June 20-22 2007
    • Brown, H. S., Vergragt, P., Green, K., & Berchicci, L. (2003) Learning for Sustainability Transition through Bounded Socio-technical Experiments in Personal Mobility. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(3), 291-315.
    • Brown, H. S., & Vergragt, P. J. (2008) Bounded socio-technical experiments as agents of systemic change: The case of a zero-energy residential building. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(1), 107-130.
    • Brownlee, E. (2011) Bristol's Green Roots, The Schumacher Centre Ltd, Bristol. UK
    • BSC. (2013) Bristol Solar City. [Online] Available at www.bristolsolarcity.com [Accessed 8/07/2013]
    • Budde, B., Alkemade, F., & Weber, K. M. (2012) Expectations as a key to understanding actor strategies in the field of fuel cell and hydrogen vehicles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79-540(6-7), 1072-1083.
    • Bulkeley, H., Broto, V. C., Marvin, S., & Hodson, S. (Eds.). (2010) Cities and low carbon transitions. Routledge, London, UK
    • Capener, P. (2010) People-powered responses to Climate Change. [Online] Available at www.nesta.org.uk [Accessed 11/11/2013]
    • Catney, P., MacGregor, S., Dobson, A., Hall, S. M., Royston, S., Robinson, Z., Ormerod, M & Ross, S. (2013) Big society, little justice? Community renewable energy and the politics of localism. Local Environment, 19(7), 715-730.
    • CCC (2008) Building a low-carbon economy - the UK's contribution to tackling climate change. Committee on Climate Change, London, UK
    • CCC (2015) Meeting Carbon Budgets- 2015 Progress in reducing the UK's emissions, 2015 Report to Parliament. Committee on Climate Change, London, UK
    • DECC. (2012) The Energy Efficiency Strategy: The Energy Efficiency Opportunity in the UK, Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, UK
    • DECC (2013a) Energy Efficiency Strategy, 2013 update, Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, UK
    • DECC (2013b) UK Solar PV strategy Part 1: Roadmap to a brighter Future, Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, UK
    • DECC (2014a) Community Energy Strategy: Full Report, Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, UK
    • DECC (2014b) Community Energy Revolution. Letter to local authorities, Department of Energy and Climate Change, London, UK
    • Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (Eds.). (2004) System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK
    • Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., & Coenen, L. (2012) Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 991-998.
    • Fergusson, G (2010) 'Let's all bottle this sunshine' Bristol Post. [Online] 28th Jun. Available from: www.bristolpost.co.uk [Accessed 03/06/2013]
    • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
    • Flyvbjerg, B. (2011) 'Case study'. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitatitive Research (4th ed.) Sage, London, UK. pp. 301-316
    • Geels, F. W. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274.
    • Geels, F. W. (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Research Policy, 33(6-7), 897-920.
    • Geels, F. W. (2005) Technological Transitions and System Innovations. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK
    • Geels, F. W. & Schot, J. (2010) Theoretical Backgrounds: Science and Technology Studies, Evolutionary Economics and Sociology. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to Sustainable Development: Long Term Transformative Change, Routledge. London, UK. pp. 29-53
    • Geels, F. W., Hekkert, M. P., & Jacobsson, S. (2008) The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 521- 536.
    • Geels, F. W., Monaghen, A., Eames, M., & Steward, F. (2008) The Feasibility of Systems Thinking in Sustainable Consumption and Production Policy. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK
    • Geels, F., & Raven, R. (2006) Non-linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas (1973-2003). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3-4), 375-392.
    • Genus, A., & Coles, A.-M. (2008) Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy, 37(9), 1436-1445.
    • George, A., & Bennett, A. (2005) Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US
    • Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010) Conclusion : How to Understand Transitions? How to Influence Them? Synthesis and Lessons for Further Research. J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to Sustainable Development: Long Term Transformative Change, Routledge. London, UK. pp. 320-338
    • Haddon, L. (2006) The Contribution of Domestication Research to In-Home Computing and Media Consumption. The Information Society, 22(4), 195-203.
    • Haddon, L. (2011) Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the Centrality of Technologies in Everyday Life. Canadian Journal of Communication, 36, 311- 323.
    • Hale, S. (2010) The new politics of climate change: why we are failing and how we will succeed. Environmental Politics, 19(2), 255-275.
    • Hamilton, J., Mayne, R., Parag, Y., & Bergman, N. (2015). Scaling up local carbon action: the role of partnerships, networks and policy. Carbon Management, 37- 41.
    • Hargreaves, T. (2012a). Carbon Conversations: An Innovation History. [Online] February 2013. Available from www.grassrootsinnovations.org Accessed 04.04.2013
    • Hargreaves, T. (2012b). Bristol Green Doors: An Innovation History. [Online] November 2012. Available from www.grassrootsinnovations.org Accessed 05.01.2013
    • Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013) Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 868-880.
    • Heiskanen, E., Johnson, M., Robinson, S., Vadovics, E., & Saastamoinen, M. (2010). Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7586-7595.
    • Heiskanen, E., Jalas, M., Rinkinen, J., & Tainio, P. (2014). The local community as “lowcarbon lab”: Promises and perils. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1-16.
    • Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2011). Community Innovation for Sustainable Energy. CSERGE Working Paper 2011-03 (CSERGE, Norwich)
    • Hielscher, S. (2013) Isle of Gigha Heritage Trust : An Innovation History. [Online] February 2013. Available from www.grassrootsinnovations.org [Accessed 04.04.2013]
    • Highman, K (2011) Bristol Sunshine: An Analysis of Solar Rooftop Mapping Techniques & Outputs, Bristol City Council, Bristol, UK
    • Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2009) Cities mediating technological transitions: understanding visions, intermediation and consequences. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(4), 515-534.
    • Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010) Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39(4), 477-485.
    • Hodson, M., Marvin, S., & Bulkeley, H. (2013) The Intermediary Organisation of Low Carbon Cities: A Comparative Analysis of Transitions in Greater London and Greater Manchester. Urban Studies, 50(7), 1403-1422.
    • Hoffman, S. M., & High-Pippert, A. (2010) From private lives to collective action: Recruitment and participation incentives for a community energy program. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7567-7574.
    • Hoggett, R. (2010) The opportunities and barriers for communities to secure at-risk finance for the development of revenue-generating renewable energy projects. Masters thesis, University of Exeter, pp. 1-94
    • Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Truffer, B. (2002) Experimenting for Sustainable Transport. Spon Press. London, UK
    • Houghton, T. (2010). Galvanising Community-led responses to climate change, NESTA, London, UK
    • Howells, J. (2006) Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715-728.
    • Hughes, T. P. (1987) The Evolution of large technological system, In W..E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes & T. Pinch (ed.s) The social construction of technological systems. The MIT Press, Massachusetts, US, pp. 45-76
    • Kivimaa, P. (2014) Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in systemlevel transitions. Research Policy, 43(8), 1370-1380.
    • Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009) Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: Insights from the Dutch agricultural sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 849-860.
    • Laegran, A. S., & Stewart, J. (2003) Nerdy, Trendy or Healthy? Configuring the Internet Café. New Media & Society, 5(3), 357-377.
    • Laegran, A.S. (2005) Escape Vehicles? The internet and the automobile in a local-global intersection' In Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. (Eds.) How Users Matter: The CoConstruction of Users and Technologies, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. pp. 81-100.
    • Lamvik, G. M. (1996) “Fairy Tale on Wheels: The Car as a Vehicle for Meaning within a Norwegian Subculture”. In Lie, M. & Sørensen, K (eds.) Making Technologies our own? Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Scandinavian University Press. Oslo, Norway 151-170.
    • Langley, A. (1999) Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710
    • Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Ven de Ven, A. (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1-13.
    • Leicester, P. Goodier, C. & Rowley, P (2011) Evaluating the impacts of community renewable energy initiatives, presentation to ISES Solar World Congress 2011, Kassel, Germany
    • Middlemiss, L., & Parrish, B. D. (2010) Building capacity for low-carbon communities: The role of grassroots initiatives. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7559-7566.
    • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data analysis (2nd ed.) Sage, Thousand Oaks, California
    • Ornetzeder, M., & Rohracher, H. (2006) User-led innovations and participation processes: lessons from sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy, 34(2), 138-150.
    • Osborn, S (2009) Building a positive future for Bristol after Peak Oil, Report to the Bristol Green Capital Partnership, Commissioned by Bristol City Council, Bristol, UK [Online] Available at http://www.bristol.gov.uk/page/environment/peak-oiland-transition-bristol [Accessed 14/09/12]
    • Oudshoorn, & Pinch, T. J. (2005). How users and non-users matter. In N. Oudshoorn & T. J. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US
    • Parag, Y., Hamilton, J., White, V., & Hogan, B. (2013) Network approach for local and community governance of energy: The case of Oxfordshire. Energy Policy, 62, 1064-1077
    • PB (2012) Solar PV cost update. Produced by Parsons Brinckerhoff for the Department of Energy and Climate Change, May 2012, Bristol, UK
    • Pedriana, N. (2005) Rational Choice, Structural Context, and Increasing Returns: A Strategy for Analytic Narrative in Historical Sociology. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(3), 349-382.
    • Penna, C. C. R., & Geels, F. W. (2012) Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 999-1020.
    • Pentland, B. T. (1995) Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes. Organization Science, 6(5), 541-556.
    • Pentland, B. T. (1999) Building Process Theory with Narrative: From Description to Explanation. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711.
    • Poole, M. S. & Van de Ven, A. (1989) 'Toward a general theory of innovation' In Van de Ven, A., Angle., H & Poole, M. S. (Ed.s) (1989) Research on the management of innovation. Ballinger, New York. pp. 637-662
    • Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A., Dooley, K., & Holmes, M. (2000) Organisational change and innovation processes. Oxford University Press. Oxford, UK
    • Rip, A. (2000) There's No Turn Like the Empirical Turn. In Kroes, P. and Meijers, A. (eds.), The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 3-17.
    • Rip, A. (2012) The Context of Innovation Journeys. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 158-170.
    • Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998) Technological change. In S. Rayner & L. Malone (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol 2 Resources and Technology. Batelle Press, Washington, US. pp.327-399
    • Rip, A. Misa, T & Schot, S (1995) Managing technology in society: the approach of constructive technology assessment, Pinter, London, UK
    • Rogers, J., Simmons, E., Convery, I., & Weatherall, A. (2008) Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4217-4226.
    • Rohracher, H. (2001) Managing the Technological Transition to Sustainable Construction of Buildings : A Socio-Technical Perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, (October 2012), 37-41.
    • Rohracher, H. (2005) From Passive Consumer to Active Participants: the diverse roles of users in innovation processes. In Rohracher, H. (Ed.) User Involvement in Innovation Processes: Strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective. Profil. Munchen, Wein. pp.9-35
    • Rohracher, H. (2009) Intermediaries and the governance of choice: the case of green electricity labelling. Environment and Planning A, 41(8), 2014-2028.
    • Rohracher, H., & Spath, P. (2013) The Interplay of Urban Energy Policy and Sociotechnical Transitions: The Eco-cities of Graz and Freiburg in Retrospect. Urban Studies, 1-17. DOI:10.1177/0042098013500360
    • Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008) Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537-554.
    • Schreuer, A., Ornetzeder, M., & Rohracher, H. (2010) Negotiating the local embedding of socio-technical experiments: a case study in fuel cell technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(6), 729-743.
    • Schumpeter, J., (1942/1993) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Routledge, London.
    • Seyfang, G., Park, J. J., & Smith, A. (2013) A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy, 61, 977-989.
    • Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M., & Smith, A. (2014) A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 21-44.
    • Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007). CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A, 39(4), 763-770.
    • Sørensen, K. (2006) Domestication: the social enactment of technology. In T. Berker, M. Hartman, Y Punie & K. Ward (Ed.) Domestication of media and technology. Open University Press. Maidenhead, UK. Pp.40-61
    • Sørensen, K. H., Aune, M., & Halting, M. (2000) Against Linearity: On the Cultural Appropriation of Science and Technology. In M. Dierkes & C. von Grote (Eds.), Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology (pp. 237-257). Routledge, London, UK.
    • Sovacool, B. K. (2009) Rejecting renewables: The socio-technical impediments to renewable electricity in the United States. Energy Policy, 37(11), 4500-4513.
    • Sovacool, B. K., & Watts, C. (2009). Going Completely Renewable: Is It Possible (Let Alone Desirable)? Electricity Journal, 22(4), 95-111.
    • Te Kulve, H., 2014. Anticipating Market Introduction of Nanotechnology-enabled Drug Delivery Systems, in: A.D. Sezer, (Ed.), Application of Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery. InTech, pp.501-524
    • Truffer, B., & Coenen, L. (2012) Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies, 46(1), 1-22.
    • Van de Ven, A. H. (2007) Engaged scholarship: A guide for organisation and social research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
    • Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organisations. Acadamey of Management Review, 20(3), 510-540.
    • Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (2005) Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change. Organization Studies, 26(9), 1377-1404.
    • van Lente, H., Hekkert, M., Smits, R., & Waveren, B. A. S. Van. (2003) Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 247-279.
    • Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H., & Evans, B. (2010) Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 38(6), 2655-2663.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok