LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: QL
Associations between specific host genes and susceptibility to Mycobacterial infections such as tuberculosis have been reported in several species. Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) impacts greatly the UK cattle industry, yet genetic predispositions have yet to be identified. We therefore used a candidate gene approach to study 384 cattle of which 160 had reacted positively to an antigenic skin test (‘reactors’). Our approach was unusual in that it used microsatellite markers, embraced high breed diversity and focused particularly on detecting genes showing heterozygote advantage, a mode of action often overlooked in SNP-based studies. A panel of neutral markers was used to control for population substructure and using a general linear model-based approach we were also able to control for age. We found that substructure was surprisingly weak and identified two genomic regions that were strongly associated with reactor status, identified by markers INRA111 and BMS2753. In general the strength of association detected tended to vary depending on whether age was included in the model. At INRA111 a single genotype appears strongly protective with an overall odds ratio of 2.2, the effect being consistent across nine diverse breeds. Our results suggest that breeding strategies could be devised that would appreciably increase genetic resistance of cattle to bTB (strictly, reduce the frequency of incidence of reactors) with implications for the current debate concerning badger-culling.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Anon (2008) DEFRA expenditure report. Available: http://www.defra.gov.uk/ foodfarm/farmanimal/diseases/atoz/tb/documents/expenditure-stats.pdf.
    • 2. Bourne J, Donnelly CA, Cox D, Gettinby G, McInerny J, et al. (2007) Bovine TB: the scientific evidence. A science base for a sustainable policy to control TB in cattle. An epidemiological investigation into bovine tuberculosis: Final Report of the Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB.
    • 3. Garnett BT, Delahay RJ, Roper TJ (2002) Use of cattle farm resources by badgers (Meles meles) and risk of bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) transmission to cattle. Proc R Soc B 269: 1487-1491.
    • 4. Carrique-Mas JJ, Medley GF, Green LE (2008) Risks for bovine tuberculosis in British cattle farms restocked after the foot and mouth disease epidemic of 2001. Prevent Vet Med 84: 85-93.
    • 5. Ram´ırez-Villescusa AM, Medley GF, Mason S, Green LE (2009) Herd and individual animal risks associated with bovine tuberculosis skin test positivity in cattle in herds in south west England. Prevent Vet Med 92: 188-198.
    • 6. Bellamy R, Hill AV (1998) Genetic susceptibility to mycobacteria and other infectious pathogens in humans. Curr Opin Immunol 10: 483-487.
    • 7. Cooke GS, Campbell SJ, Bennett S, Leienhardt C, MacAdam KPWJ, et al. (2008) Mapping of a novel susceptibility locus suggests a role for MC3R and CTSZ in human tuberculosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 178: 203-207.
    • 8. Galindo RC, Ayoubi P, Naranjo V, Gortazar C, Kocan KM, et al. (2009) Gene expression profiles of European wild boar naturally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. Vet Immunol Immunopath 129: 119-125.
    • 9. Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Vicente J, Gortazar C, Ho¨fle U, Ferna´ndez-deMera IG, et al. (2005) Genetic resistance to infection and severity of bovine tuberculosis in wild boar. Mol Ecol 14: 3209-3217.
    • 10. Meade KG, Gormley E, Doyle MB, Fitzsimmons T, O'Farrelly C, et al. (2007) Innate gene repression associated with Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle: toward a gene signature of the disease. BMC Genomics 8: 400.
    • 11. Bermingham ML, More SJ, Good M, Cromie AR, Higgins IM, et al. (2009) Genetics of tuberculosis in Irish Holstein-Friesian dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 92: 3447-3456.
    • 12. Allen AR, Minozzi G, Glass EJ, Skuce RA, McDowell SWJ, et al. (2010) Bovine tuberculosis: the genetic basis of host susceptibility. Proc R Soc B 277: 2737-2745.
    • 13. Suekawa Y, Aihara H, Araki M, Hosokawa D, Mannen H, et al. (2010) Development of breed identification markers based on a bovine 50 K SNP array. Meat Sci 85: 285-288.
    • 14. Yoo YJ, Bull SB, Paterson AD, Waggott D, The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Edidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group, et al. (2010) Were genome-wide linkage studies a waste of time? Exploiting candidate regions within genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol 34: 107-118.
    • 15. Ohashi J, Tokunaga K (2001) The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers. J Hum Genet 46: 478-482.
    • 16. Schulze TG, McMahon FJ (2002) Genetic association mapping at the crossroads: which test and why? Overview and practical guidelines. Am J Medic Genet (Neuropsych Genet) 114: 1-11.
    • 17. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Wieinblatt ME, Shadick NA, et al. (2006) Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38: 904-909.
    • 18. Messaoudi I, Pati n˜o JAG, Dyall R, LeMaoult J, Nikolich-Zˇ ugich J (2002) Science 298: 1797-1800.
    • 19. Lyons EJ, Amos W, Berkley JA, Mwangi I, Shafi M, et al. (2009) Homozygosity and risk of childhood death due to invasive bacterial disease. BMC Med Genet 10: 55.
    • 20. Amos W, Bryant C (2010) Using human demographic history to infer natural selection reveals contrasting patterns on different families of immune genes. Proc R Soc B (online early).
    • 21. de la Rua-Domenech R, Goodchild AT, Vordermeier HM, Hewinson RG, Christiansen KH, et al. (2006) Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: a review of tuberculin tests, y-interferon assay and other ancilliary diagnostic techniques. Res Vet Sci 81: 190-210.
    • 22. Strober W, Murray PJ, Kitani A, Watanabe T (2006) Signalling pathways and molecular interactions of NOD1 and NOD2. Nature Rev Immunol 6: 9-20.
    • 23. Ferwerda G, Girardin SE, Kullberg B-J, Le Bourhis L, de Jong DJ, et al. (2005) NOD2 and Toll-like receptors are non-redundant recognition systems of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Path 1: e34.
    • 24. Buddle BM, Wedlock DN, Denis M, Skinner MA (2005) Identification of immune response correlates for protection against bovine tuberculosis. Vet Immunol Immunopath 108: 45-51.
    • 25. Waters WR, Palmer MV, Whipple DL, Carlson MP, Nonnecke BJ (2003) Diagnostic implications of antigen-induced gamma interferon, nitric oxide and tumour necrosis factor alpha production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from Mycobacterium bovis-infected cattle. Clinic Diag Lab Immunol 10: 960-966.
    • 26. Singhal A, Jaiswal A, Arora VK, Prasad HK (2007) Modulation of gamma interferon receptor 1 by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a potential immune response evasive mechanism. Infect Immun 75: 2500-2510.
    • 27. Bennett S, Lienhardt C, Bah-Sow O, Gustafson P, Manneh K, et al. (2002) Investigation of environmental and host-related factors of tuberculosis in Africa. II Investigation of host genetic factors. Am J Epidem 155: 1074-1079.
    • 28. Estrada-Ch a´vez C, Pereira-Sua´ rez AL, Meraz MA, Arriaga C, Garc´ıaCarranca´ A, et al. (2001) High-level expression of NRAMP1 in peripheral cells and tuberculous granulomas from Mycobacterium bovis-infected bovines. Infect Immun 69: 7165-7168.
    • 29. Li H, Zhang TT, Zhou YQ, Huang QH, Huang J (2006) SLC11A1 (formerly NRAMP1) gene polymorphisms and tuberculosis susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 10: 3-12.
    • 30. Hoffman JI, Amos W (2005) Microsartellite genotyping error: detection approaches, common sources and consequences of paternal exclusion. Mol Ecol 14: 599-612.
    • 31. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Rosenberg NA, Donelly P (2000) Association mapping in structured populations. Am J Hum Genet 67: 170-181.
    • 32. Cardon LR, Palmer LJ (2003) Population stratification and spurious allele associations. Lancet 361: 598-604.
    • 33. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
    • 34. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D (2006) Population structure and Eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet 2: e190.
    • 35. Armitage P (1955) Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 11: 375-386.
    • 36. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    • 37. Amos W, Acevedo-Whitehouse KA (2009) A new test for genotype - fitness associations reveals a single microsatellite allele that strongly predicts the nature of tuberculosis infections in wild boar. Mol Ecol Res 9: 1102-1111.
    • 38. Ohashi J, Yamamoto S, Tsuchiya N, Hatta Y, Komata T, et al. (2001) Comparison of statistical power between 262 allele frequency and allele positivity tables in case-control studies of complex disease genes. Ann Hum Genet 65: 197-206.
    • 39. Epstein MP, Allen AS, Satten GA (2007) A simple and improved correction for population stratification in case-control studies. Am J Hum Genet 80: 921-930.
    • 40. Slate J, Pemberton JM (2006) Does reduced heterozygosity depress sperm quality in wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)? Curr Biol 16: R790-R791.
    • 41. Li M-H, Kantanen J (2009) Genetic structure of Eurasian cattle (Bos taurus) based on microsatellites: clarification of their breed classification. Anim Genet 41: 150-158.
    • 42. Novoa MA, Usaque´n W (2010) Population genetic structure of the Brahman cattle (Bos indicus) in Columbia with microsatellite markers. Anim Breed Genet 127: 161-168.
    • 43. Fernando SL, Britton WJ (2006) Genetic susceptibility to mycobacterial disease in humans. Immunol Cell Biol 84: 125-137.
    • 44. Amos W, Driscoll E, Hoffman JI (2010) Candidate genes versus genome-wide associations: which are better for detecting genetic susceptibility to infectious disease? Proc R Soc B. In press.
    • 45. Schulman NF, Viitala SM, de Koning DJ, Virta J, Ma¨ki-Tanila A, et al. (2004) Quantitative trait loci for health traits in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. J Dairy Sci 87: 443-449.
    • 46. Imai K, Kurita-Ochiai T, Ochiai K (2003) Mycobacterium bovis bacillus CalmetteGue´rin infection promotes SOCS induction and inhibits IFN-Q-stimulated JAK/STAT signaling in J774 macrophages. FEBS Immun Med Microbiol 39: 173-180.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article