LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF, LB1603

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education, health care economics and organizations
© 2015, © The Author(s) 2015. Prior to high stakes examinations, teachers may engage in instructional practices to encourage their students to prepare well for their exams, including the use of ‘fear appeals’. The current study examined whether academic buoyancy played a role in student appraisals of fear appeals as threatening or challenging. High school students (N = 770) preparing for high-stakes mathematics exams in England completed self-report measures of the frequency with which their teacher used fear appeals, how they appraised those fear appeals, and their academic buoyancy. In line with prediction, students appraised fear appeals as more threatening and challenging as the frequency of fear appeal use increased. When fear appeals were used more frequently, a challenge appraisal was more likely when academic buoyancy was higher. Although a threat appraisal was less likely when academic buoyancy was higher, the protective influence diminished when fear appeals were used more frequently. Educational implications are discussed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R.K., & Culpepper, S.A. (2013). Best practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interactions using multilevel modelling. Journal of Human Management, 39(6), 1490-1528.doi: 10.1177/0149206313478188
    • Chen, J.J.L. (2008). Grade-level differences: Relations of parental, teacher and peer support to academic engagement and achievement among Hong Kong students. School Psychology International, 29(2), 183-198. doi: 10.1177/0143034308090059
    • Hanushek, E. A., & Raymond, M. F. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis & Management, 24(2), 297-327. doi: 10.1002/pam.20091
    • Heck, R.H., & Thomas, S.L. (2009). An introduction to multilevel modelling techniques (2nd edition). Hove: Routledge.
    • Hoferichter, F., Raufelder, D. & Eid, M. (2014). The mediating role of socio-motivational relationships in the interplay of perceived stress, neuroticism, and test anxiety among adolescent students. Psychology in the School, 5(7), 736-752. doi: 10.1002/pits.21778
    • Koretz, D. & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Testing for accountability in K-12. In R.L Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4th ed.) (pp. 531-578). Westport, Connecticut: American Council on Education.
    • Locker, J. & Cropley, M. (2004). Anxiety, depression and self-esteem in secondary school children: An investigation into the impact of SAT's and other important school examinations. School Psychology International, 25(3), 333-345. doi: 10.1177/0143034304046905
    • Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., & Kunter, M. (2009). Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modelling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 120-131. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001
    • Malmberg, L-E., Hall, J., & Martin, A.J. (2013). Academic buoyancy in secondary school: Exploring patterns of convergence in English, mathematics, science, and physical education. Learning and Individual Differences, 23(1), 262-266.doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.014
    • Marsh, H.W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A. J. S., Abduljabbar, A. S. ,et al. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 106- 124. doi.10.1080/00461520.2012.670488.
    • Martin, A.J.. (2013). Academic buoyancy and academic resilience: Exploring 'everyday' and 'classic' resilience in the face of academic adversity. School Psychology International, 34(5), 488-500. doi: 10.1177/0143034312472759
    • Martin, A.J., Colmar, S.H., Davey, L.A. & Marsh, H.W. (2010). Longitudinal modelling of academic buoyancy and motivation: Do the '5Cs' hold up over time? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 473-496. doi:10.1348/000709910X486376
    • Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008a). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students' everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 53-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002
    • Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008b). Workplace and academic buoyancy: Psychometric assessment and construct validity amongst school personnel and students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26(2), 169-184. doi:10.1177/0734282907313767
    • Martin, A.J., & Marsh, H.W. (2009). Academic resilience and academic buoyancy: multidimensional and hierarchical conceptual framing of causes, correlates and cognate constructs. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 353-370. 10.1080/03054980902934639
    • Mathieu, J.E., Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S.A., & Chen, G. (2012). Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modelling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 951-966.doi: 10.1037/a0028380
    • Morin, A.J.S., Marsh, H.W., Nagengast, B., & Scalas, L.F. (2014). Doubly latent multilevel analyses of classroom climate: An illustration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(2), 143-167.doi: 10.1080/00220973.2013.769412
    • Onion, A.J. (2004). What use is mathematics to me? A report on the outcomes from student focus groups. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 23(4), 189- 194.doi.org/10.1093/teamat/23.4.189.
    • Peugh, J.L. (2009). A practical guide to multilevel modelling. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 85-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
    • Putwain, D.W. (2009). Assessment and examination stress in Key Stage 4. British Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 391-411. doi: 10.1080/01411920802044404
    • Putwain, D.W., Connors, L., Symes, W. & Douglas-Osborn, E. (2012). Is academic buoyancy anything more than adaptive coping? Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 25(3), 349-358. 10.1080/10615806.2011.582459.
    • Putwain, D.W. & Daly, A.L. (2013). Do clusters of test anxiety and academic buoyancy differentially predict academic performance? Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 157-162. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.010
    • Putwain, D.W. & Remedios, R. (2014). The scare tactic: Do fear appeals predict motivation and exam scores? School Psychology Quarterly. April 2014. doi:10.1037/spq0000048
    • Putwain, D.W., Remedios, R., & Symes, W. (2014). The appraisal of fear appeals as threatening or challenging: Frequency of use, academic self-efficacy and subjective value. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. Advance online publication, doi: 10.1080/01443410.2014.963028
    • Putwain, D. W. & Roberts, C.M. (2009). The development of an instrument to measure teachers' use of fear appeals in the GCSE classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 643-661. doi: 10.1348/000709909X426130
    • Putwain, D.W., & Roberts, C.M. (2012). Fear and efficacy appeals in the classroom: The secondary teachers' perspective. Educational Psychology, 32(3),355-372. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2012.659845
    • Putwain, D.W. & Symes, W. (2011a). Teachers' use of fear appeals in the Mathematics classroom: Worrying or motivating students? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 456-474. doi: 10.1348/2044-8279.002005
    • Putwain, D.W. & Symes, W. (2011b). Perceived fear appeals and examination performance: Facilitating or debilitating outcomes? Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 227- 232. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.022
    • Putwain, D.W. & Symes, W. (2014). The perceived value of maths and academic selfefficacy in the appraisal of fear appeals used prior to a high-stakes test as threatening or challenging. Social Psychology of Education, 17(2), 229-248. doi: 10.1007/s11218- 014-9249-7
    • Roberts, K. (2004). School-to-work transitions: Why the United Kingdom's educational ladders always fail to connect. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 14(3), 203-216.doi.10.1080/09620210400200126.
    • Zimmerman, B.J. & Dibenedetto, M.K. (2008). Mastery learning and assessment: Implications for students and teachers in an era of high-stakes testing. Psychology in the Schools, 45(3), 206-216. doi:10.1002/pits.20291
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article