Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Kanavos, Panagiotis Grigoriou
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Health\ud care\ud now\ud accounts\ud for\ud just\ud under\ud 10%\ud of\ud national\ud income\ud in\ud most\ud developed\ud OEeD\ud countries.\ud Yet,\ud despite\ud its\ud importance\ud in\ud the\ud overall\ud economy,\ud the\ud factors\ud that\ud drive\ud health\ud care\ud expenditure\ud remain\ud only\ud imperfectly\ud understood.\ud This\ud thesis\ud shows\ud that\ud the\ud determinants\ud of\ud health\ud care\ud expenditures\ud are\ud simply\ud too\ud diverse\ud amongst\ud different\ud countries\ud to\ud be\ud brought\ud within\ud a\ud common\ud denominator\ud such\ud as\ud GDP,\ud as\ud it\ud has\ud been\ud argued\ud for\ud decades.\ud It\ud also\ud shows\ud that\ud the\ud assumption\ud that\ud health\ud care\ud is\ud a\ud homogeneous\ud good\ud across\ud countries\ud is\ud over-simplistic\ud and\ud arbitrary,\ud and\ud finds\ud ample\ud evidence\ud showing\ud that\ud health\ud care\ud is\ud not\ud a\ud luxury\ud good,\ud as\ud widely\ud suggested.\ud The\ud contribution\ud of\ud the\ud thesis\ud is\ud on\ud methodological,\ud theoretical\ud and\ud empirical\ud grounds.\ud In\ud terms\ud of\ud methodology,\ud the\ud thesis\ud shows\ud that\ud there\ud are\ud significant\ud flaws\ud in\ud several\ud areas\ud that\ud influence\ud our\ud thinking\ud concerning\ud the\ud determinants\ud of\ud health\ud care\ud expenditures\ud and\ud offers\ud alternative\ud ways\ud of\ud analysis\ud and\ud appraisal.\ud Flaws\ud were\ud shown\ud in:\ud the\ud relationship\ud between\ud health\ud expenditure\ud and\ud GDP;\ud the\ud importance\ud of\ud factors\ud such\ud as\ud ageing;\ud the\ud macroeconomic\ud context\ud and\ud the\ud burden\ud of\ud disease;\ud the\ud measurement\ud of\ud key\ud variables\ud used\ud in\ud empirical\ud analysis\ud such\ud as\ud health\ud spending,\ud national\ud income,\ud technology,\ud and\ud health\ud prices;\ud the\ud method\ud of\ud analysis\ud that\ud has\ud been\ud pursued;\ud and\ud the\ud conversion\ud factors\ud used\ud to\ud translate\ud prices\ud and\ud monetary\ud variables\ud across\ud countries\ud into\ud a\ud single\ud and\ud comparable\ud denominator.\ud The\ud thesis\ud makes\ud a\ud theoretical\ud contribution\ud of\ud the\ud analysis\ud of\ud health\ud care\ud expenditures,\ud assuming\ud that\ud health\ud care\ud is\ud at\ud least\ud a\ud quasi-public\ud good.\ud The\ud proposed\ud conceptual\ud framework\ud explicitly\ud links\ud the\ud determinants\ud of\ud health\ud care\ud expenditures\ud to\ud the\ud theory\ud of\ud public\ud finance\ud and\ud allows\ud flexible\ud adjustments\ud by\ud decision-makers\ud to\ud account\ud for\ud changes\ud in\ud technology,\ud prices,\ud and\ud the\ud macroeconomic\ud environment.\ud The\ud impact\ud of\ud the\ud macroeconomy\ud on\ud health\ud spending\ud is\ud assessed\ud by\ud evaluating\ud whether\ud the\ud rate\ud of\ud growth\ud of\ud income\ud has\ud any\ud influence\ud on\ud the\ud demand\ud for\ud health\ud and\ud whether\ud the\ud fiscal\ud deficit\ud impacts\ud on\ud health\ud spending\ud and\ud to\ud what\ud extent.\ud The\ud proposed\ud framework\ud incorporates\ud technology\ud and\ud this\ud is\ud an\ud advance\ud from\ud the\ud published\ud literature,\ud which\ud has\ud almost\ud invariably\ud considered\ud technology\ud to\ud be\ud a\ud residual\ud factor.\ud Finally,\ud the\ud thesis\ud recognises\ud that\ud the\ud lag\ud structure\ud of\ud the\ud model,\ud the\ud availability\ud of\ud data,\ud and\ud knowledge\ud of\ud the\ud relationship\ud between\ud disease\ud and\ud need\ud for\ud services\ud are\ud not\ud sufficient\ud to\ud test\ud for\ud the\ud impact\ud of\ud lifestyle\ud and\ud disease\ud factors\ud on\ud health\ud spending.\ud The\ud empirical\ud investigation\ud provides\ud conclusive\ud evidence\ud of\ud the\ud non-importance\ud of\ud GOP\ud in\ud explaining\ud health\ud care\ud spending\ud trends\ud over\ud time.\ud Consumption\ud is\ud shown\ud to\ud be\ud a\ud predictor\ud of\ud health\ud expenditures;\ud technology\ud is\ud an\ud important\ud cost-push\ud factor\ud across\ud countries;\ud the\ud macroeconomy\ud exerts,\ud in\ud general,\ud significant\ud pressure\ud on\ud health\ud care\ud expenditure;\ud however,\ud the\ud impact\ud of\ud health\ud care\ud reforms\ud does\ud not\ud show\ud any\ud significant\ud impact\ud on\ud health\ud care\ud expenditures;\ud and\ud the\ud number\ud of\ud doctors\ud per\ud capita\ud has\ud little\ud or\ud no\ud association\ud with\ud health\ud care\ud expenditures.
  • No references.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article