OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Deroche, Mickael L. D.; Culling, John Francis (2011)
Publisher: Acoustical Society of America
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RC0321, BF, RF
Identifiers:doi:10.1121/1.3643812
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Allen, J. B., and Berkley, D. A. (1979). “Image method for efficiently simulating small-room acoustics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65, 943-950.
    • Assmann, P. F., and Summerfield, Q. (1990). “Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Vowels with different fundamental frequencies,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 680-697.
    • Assmann, P. F., and Summerfield, Q. (1994). “The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 471-484.
    • Bird, J., and Darwin, C. J. (1998). “Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences,” in Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing, edited by A. R. Palmer, A. Rees, A.Q. Summerfield, and R. Meddis (Whurr, London), pp. 263-269.
    • Brokx, J., and Nooteboom, S. (1982). “Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices,” J. Phonetics. 10, 23-36.
    • Carlyon, R. P., and Datta, A. J. (1997a). “Excitation produced by Schroeder-phase complexes: Evidence for fast-acting compression in the auditory system,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3636-3647.
    • Carlyon, R. P., and Datta, A. J. (1997b). “Masking period patterns of Schroeder-phase complexes: Effects of level, number of components, and phase of flanking components,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3648-3657.
    • Cherry, E. C. (1953). “Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25, 975-979.
    • de Cheveigne´, A., McAdams, S., Laroche, J., and Rosenberg, M. (1995). “Identification of concurrent harmonic and inharmonic vowels: A test of the theory of harmonic cancellation and enhancement,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3736-3748.
    • de Cheveigne´, A., Kawahara, H., Tsuzaki, M., and Aikawa, K. (1997). “Concurrent vowel segregation. I. Effects of relative amplitude and F0 difference,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 2839-2847.
    • de Cheveigne´, A. (1999). “Waveform interactions and the segregation of concurrent vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 2959-2972.
    • Ciocca, V., and Darwin, C. J. (1993). “Effects of onset asynchrony on pitch perception: Adaptation or grouping?,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2870-2878.
    • Culling, J. F. (1996). “Signal processing software for teaching and research for psychoacoustics under UNIX and X windows,” Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 28, 376-382.
    • Culling, J. F., and Darwin, C. J. (1993). “Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: Within and across-formant grouping by F0,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 3454-3467.
    • Culling, J. F., and Darwin, C. J. (1994). “Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: Cues arising from low frequency beating,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1559-1569.
    • Culling, J. F., Summerfield, Q., and Marshall, D. (1994). “Effects of simulated reverberation on the use of binaural cues and fundamental-frequency differences for separating concurrent vowels,” Speech Commun. 14, 71-95.
    • Culling, J. F., Hodder, K., and Toh, C. (2003). “Effects of reverberation on perceptual segregation of competing voices,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2871-2876.
    • Darwin, C. J., and Ciocca, V. (1992). “Grouping in pitch perception: Effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 3381-3390.
    • Darwin, C. J., Brungart, D. S., and Simpson, B. D. (2003). “Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length changes on attention to one of two simultaneous talkers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 2913-2922.
    • Glasberg, B. R., and Moore, B. C. J. (1990). “Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data,” Hear. Res. 47, 103-138.
    • Houtgast, T., and Steeneken, H. (1985). “A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria,” J. Acout. Soc. Am. 77, 1069-1077.
    • IEEE (1969). “IEEE recommended practise for speech quality measurements,” IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 17, 227-246.
    • Kohlrausch, A., and Sander, A. (1995). “Phase effects in masking related to dispersion in the inner ear. II. Masking period patterns of short targets,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1817-1829.
    • Lea, A. (1992). “Auditory models of vowel perception,” Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, UK.
    • Licklider, J. C. R. (1951). “A duplex theory of pitch perception,” Experientia 7, 128-134.
    • McKeown, J. D., and Patterson, R. D. (1995). “The time course of auditory segregation: Concurrent vowels that vary in duration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1866-1877.
    • Meddis, R., and Hewitt, M. J. (1992). “Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 233-245.
    • Moore, B. C. J., and Glasberg, B. R. (1983). “Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 750-753.
    • Moore, B. C. J., and Glasberg, B. R. (1989). “Difference limens for phase in normal and hearing-impaired subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 1351-1365.
    • Oxenham, A. J., and Dau, T. (2001). “Towards a measure of auditory-filter phase response,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 3169-3178.
    • Parsons, T. W. (1976). “Separation of speech from interfering speech by means of harmonic selection,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60, 911-918.
    • Peterson, P. M. (1986). “Simulating the response of multiple to a single source in a reverberant room,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 1527-1529.
    • Plomp, R., and Mimpen, A. M. (1979). “Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1333-1342.
    • Scheffers, M. T. M. (1983). “Sifting vowels: Auditory pitch analysis and sound segregation,” Ph.D. thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands.
    • Summerfield, Q., and Assmann, P. F. (1991). “Perception of concurrent vowels: Effects of harmonic misalignment and pitch-period asynchrony,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 1364-1377.
    • Summerfield, Q., and Culling, J. (1992). “Periodicity of maskers not targets determines ease of perceptual segregation using differences in fundamental frequency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 2317(A).
    • Summers, V., and Leek, M. R. (1998). “Masking of tones and speech by Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes in normally hearing and hearingimpaired listeners,” Hear. Res. 118, 139-150.
    • Steeneken, H., and Houtgast, T. (1980). “A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 318-326.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok