Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Matthews, P. (2014)
Publisher: Emerald
Languages: English
Types: Article
Purpose – The aim of this work was to investigate longitudinal features of an established social question-answering site to study how question-answer resources and other community features change over time.\ud \ud Design/methodology/approach – Statistical analysis and visualisation was performed on the full data dump from the StackOverflow social question-answering site for programmers.\ud \ud Findings – The timing of answers is as strong a predictor of acceptance - a proxy for user satisfaction - as the structural features of provided answers sometimes associated with quality. While many questions and answer exchanges are short-lived, there is a small yet interesting subset of questions where new answers receive community approval and which may end up being ranked more highly than early answers.\ud \ud Research limitations/implications – As a large-scale data oriented research study, this work says little about user motivations to find and contribute new knowledge to old questions or about the impact of the resource on the consumer. This will require complementary studies using qualitative and evaluative methods.\ud \ud Practical implications – While content contribution to social question-asking is largely undertaken within a very short time frame, content consumption is usually over far longer periods. Methods and incentives by which content can be updated and maintained need to be considered. This work should be of interest to knowledge exchange community designers and managers. \ud \ud Originality/value – Few studies have looked at temporal patterns in social question-answering and how time and the moderation and voting systems employed may shape resource quality
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., et al. (2008) Finding High-Quality Content in Social Media. [Online]. In: Anon.
    • Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining, Palo Alto, California, USA New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 183-194. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1341531.1341557 .
    • Blooma, M.J., Chua, A.Y.K., et al. (2008) A Predictive Framework for Retrieving the Best Answer. [Online]. In: Anon. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 1107-1111. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1363686.1363944 .
    • Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., et al. (2008) Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary educational psychology 33(4), 814-840.
    • Campbell, D.G., and Fast, K.V. (2006) From Pace Layering to Resilience Theory: The Complex Implications of Tagging for Information Architecture. Paper presented at Information Architecture Summit, 2006.
    • Dearman, D. and Truong, K.N. (2010) Why Users of Yahoo!: Answers do Not Answer Questions. [Online]. In: Anon. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 329-332. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753376 .
    • Ehmann, K., Large, A., et al. (2008) Collaboration in context: Comparing article evolution among subject disciplines in Wikipedia. First Monday [online]. 13(10), 6.
    • Fichman, P. (2011) A comparative assessment of answer quality on four question answering sites. Journal of Information Science [online]. 37(5), 476-486.
    • Fountain, R. (2007) Conceptual Enhancement Via Textual Plurality:: A Pedagogical Wiki Bow Towards Collaborative Structuration. [Online]. In: Anon. Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis, ACM, pp 43-46.
    • Gazan, R. (2011) Social Q&A. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology [online]. 62(12), 2301-2312.
    • Goldman, A.I. (1999) Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford.
    • Jain, S., Chen, Y., et al. (2009) Designing Incentives for Online Question and Answer Forums. [Online]. In: Anon. Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, Stanford, California, USA New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 129-138. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1566374.1566393 .
    • Jones, J. (2008) Patterns of Revision in Online Writing. Written Communication} [online]. 25(2), 262-289.
    • Kim, S., and Oh, S. (2009) Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(4), 716-727.
    • Kosonen, M. (2009) Knowledge sharing in virtual communities a review of the empirical research.
    • International Journal of Web Based Communities 5144-163.
    • Kruglanski, A.W. (1990) Lay Epistemic Theory in Social-Cognitive Psychology. Psychological Inquiry 1(3), 181- 197.
    • Kumar, R., Liftshits, Y., et al. (2010) Evolution of Two-Sided Markets. [Online]. In: Anon. Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, New York February 3-6 2010. Available from: http://www.wsdm-conference.org/2010/proceedings/docs/p311.pdf .
    • Luyt, B., Aaron, T.C.H., et al. (2008) Improving Wikipedia's accuracy: Is edit age a solution? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology [online]. 59(2), 318-330.
    • Mamykina, L., Manoim, B., et al. (2011) Design Lessons from the Fastest q\&\#38;a Site in the West.
    • [Online]. In: Anon. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 2857-2866. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979366 .
    • Matthews, P. and Simon, J. (2012) Evaluating and Enriching Online Knowledge Exchange: A Socioepistemological Perspective. In: A.A. Lazakidou, R. Sharda and S. Voay, eds. Virtual Communities, Social Networks and Collaboration. [Online]. Springer New York.
    • Panciera, K., Halfaker, A., et al. (2009) Wikipedians are Born, Not made: A Study of Power Editors on Wikipedia. [Online]. In: Anon. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 international conference on Supporting group work, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 51-60. Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1531674.1531682 .
    • Paul, S.A., Hong, L., et al. (2012) Who is Authoritative? Understanding Reputation Mechanisms in Quora.
    • [online]. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.3724v1 http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.3724v1.
    • Prabha, C., Lynn, S.C., et al. (2007) What is enough? Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation [online]. 63(1), 74-89.
    • Sanger, L.M. (2009) The Fate of Expertise after WIKIPEDIA. Episteme 6(1), 52-73.
    • Shah, C. (2011) Measuring effectiveness and user satisfaction in Yahoo! Answers. First Monday6(2), .
    • Shah, C., and Kitzie, V. (2012) Social Q&A and virtual reference : comparing apples and oranges with the help of experts and users. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology [online].
    • Zheng, X., Hu, Z., et al. (2012) Algorithm for recommending answer providers in community-based question answering. Journal of Information Science [online]. 38(1), 3-14.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.
  • BioEntity Site Name

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article