Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD28
Interest in the outcomes of flexible working arrangements dates from the mid 1970s, when researchers attempted to assess the impact of flexitime on worker performance. This paper reviews the literature on the link between flexible working arrangements and performance related outcomes. Taken together, the evidence fails to demonstrate a business case for the use of flexible working arrangements. This paper attempts to explain the findings by analysing the theoretical and methodological perspectives adopted, as well as the measurements and designs used. In doing so, gaps in this vast and disparate literature are identified and a research agenda is developed.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Akerlof, G. A. (1982). Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, 543-569.
    • Alis, D., Karsten, L. and Leopold, J. (2006). From Gods to Godesses. Time and Society, 15, 81- 104.
    • Allen, T. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 414-435.
    • Allen, T., Herst, D., Bruck, C. and Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-forfamily conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health, 5, 278-308.
    • Almer, E. and Kaplan, S. (2002). The effects of flexible work arrangements on stressors, burnout and behavioural job outcomes in public accounting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14, 1-34.
    • Anderson, N., Herriot, P. and Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). The practitioner-researcher divide in industrial, work and organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 391-411.
    • Anderson, S., Coffey, B. and Byerly, R. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28, 787-810.
    • Ashford, B. E., Kreiner, G. E. and Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472-491.
    • Atkinson, J. (1985). Flexibility: Planning for an uncertain future. Manpower Policy and Practice, 1, 26-29.
    • Bailey, D. and Kurland, N. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 23, 383-400.
    • Bailyn, L., Fletcher, J. and Kolb, D. (1997). Unexpected connections: Considering employees' personal lives can revitalise your business. Sloan Management Review, 38, 11-19.
    • Baltes, B., Briggs, T., Huff, J., Wright, J. and Neuman, G. (1999). Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 496-513.
    • Baptiste, N. R. (2008). Tightening the link between employee wellbeing at work and performance: A new dimension for HRM. Management Decision, 46, 284-309.
    • Batt, R. and Valcour, M. (2003). Human resource practices as predictors of work-family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial Relations, 42, 189-220.
    • Beauregard, T. A. and Henry, L. C. (2009). Making the Link between work-life practices and organizational performance, Human Resource Management Review, 19, 9-22.
    • Bertolini, S. (2002). The microregulation of atypical jobs in Italy: The case of collaborators. In Zeytinoglu, I. U. (ed), Flexible work arrangements: Conceptualizations and international experiences. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, pp. 45-61.
    • Bielenski, H., Bosch E. and Wagner, A. (2002). Working Time Preferences in Sixteen European Countries. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
    • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
    • Blettner, M., Sauerbrei, W., Schlehofer, B., Scheuchenpflug, T., Friedenreich, C. (1999). Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 28, 1-9.
    • Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. (2006). Management practices, work-life balance and productivity: A review of some recent evidence. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22, 457- 482.
    • Boles, J. and Babin, B. (1996). On the front line: Stress, conflict and the customer service provider. Journal of Business Research, 37, 41-50.
    • Bond, J. and Galinsky, E. (2006). How can employers increase the productivity and retention of entry-level, hourly employees? Families and Work Institute. Research Brief No. 2.
    • Bond, S., Hyman, J., Summers, J. and Wise, S. (2002). Family-friendly working? Putting policy into practice. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    • Boxall, P. and Purcell, J. (2003). Strategy and human resource management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Branine, M. (2003). Part-time work and job sharing in Health Care: Is the NHS a family-friendly employer? Journal of Health Organization and Management, 17, 53-68.
    • Brough, P., O'Driscoll, M. and Kalliath, T. (2005). The ability of family-friendly organizational resources to predict work-family conflict and job and family satisfaction. Stress and Health, 21, 223-234.
    • Burke, R. (1988). Some antecedents and consequences of work-family benefits. Social Behaviour and Personality, 3, 287-302.
    • Campbell-Clark, S. (2001). Work cultures and work-family balance. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 58, 348-365.
    • Caprioni, P. J. (2004). Work/life balance: You can't get there from here. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 40, 208-218.
    • Casper, W. J., Eby, L. T., Bordeaux, C., Lockwood, A. and Lambert, D. (2007). A review of research methods in IO/OB work-family research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 28-43.
    • Chow, I. H. and Keng-Howe, I. C. (2006). The effect of alternative work schedules on employee performance. International Journal of Employment Studies, 14, 105-130.
    • Christensen, K. and Staines, G. (1990). Flexitime: A viable solution to work/family conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 11, 455-476.
    • Cooke, G., Zeytinoglu, I., Agarwal, N. and Rose, J. (2008). Employee-friendly and employerfriendly non-standard work schedules and locations. Journal of Employment Studies, 16, 31- 66.
    • Cooper-Hakim, A. and Viswesvaran, C. (2005). The construct of work commitment: testing an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 241-305.
    • Costa, G., Akerstedt, T., Nachreiner, F., Baltieri, F., Carvalhais, J., Folkhard, S., Dresen, M., Gadbois, C., Gatner, J., Sukalo, H., Harma, M., Kandolin, I., Satori, S. and Silverio, J. (2004). Flexible working hours, health and well-being in Europe: Some considerations from a SALTSA project. Chronobiology International, 21, 831-844.
    • Costa, G., Sartori, S. and Akerstedt, T. (2006). Influence of flexibility and variability of working hours on health and well-being. Chronobiology International, 23, 1125-1137.
    • Cranfield School of Management (2008). Flexible Working and Performance: Summary of Research. London: Working Families.
    • Dalton, D. and Mesch, D. (1990). The impact of flexible scheduling on employee attendance and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 370-387.
    • Dawis, R. V., England, G. W. and Lofquist, L. H. (1968). A theory of adjustment (Rev ed). In Vocational Rehabilitation XXIII. University of Minnesota.
    • De Cieri, H. and Bardoel, E.A. (2009). What does 'work-life management' mean in China and Southeast Asia for MNCs?, Community, Work & Family, 12, 179-196.Department for Work and Pensions (2006). A new deal for welfare: Empowering people at work. London: Stationery Office.
    • Dex, S. and Scheibl, F. (2002). SMEs and flexible working arrangements. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    • Dex, S. and Scheibl, F. (1999). Business performance and family-friendly policies. Journal of General Management, 24, 22-37.
    • Dex, S. and Smith, C. (2002). The nature and pattern of family-friendly employment policies in Britain. Bristol: Policy Press and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    • Di Martino, V. and Wirth, L. (1990). Telework: A new way of working and living. International Labour Review, 129, 529-554.
    • Dodd, N.G. and Ganster, D.C. (1996). The interactive effects of variety, autonomy, and feedback on attitude and performance. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 17, 329-347.
    • Dunham, R., Pierce, J. and Casaneda, M. (1987). Alternative work schedules: Two field quasi experiments. Personnel Psychology, 40, 215-242.
    • Eaton, S. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment and perceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42, 145-167.
    • Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C. and Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1989-2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124-197.
    • European Commission (2000). Guidance on work related stress. Spice of life or kiss of death? Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.
    • Facer, I. and Wadsworth, L. (2008). Alternative work schedules and work-family balance: A research note. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 166-177.
    • Fleetwood, S. (2007). Why work life balance now? International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 387-400.Fisher, C.D. (2010). Happiness at Work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 384-412.
    • Forsyth, S. and Polzer-Debruyne, A. (2007). The organisational pay-offs for perceived work-life balance support. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45, 113-123.
    • Foster Thompson, L. and Aspinwall, K. R. (2009). The recruitment value of work/life benefits. Personnel Review, 38, 195-210.
    • Fotini, K. (2008). Methods for meta-analysis in genetic association studies: a review of their potentials and pitfalls. Human Genetics, 123, 1-14. Frank, K. E. and Lowe, D. J. (2003). An examination of alternative work arrangements in private accounting practice. Accounting Horizons, 17, 139-151.
    • Friedman, D. (2008). Workplace flexibility: A guide for companies. Families and Work Institute.
    • Frye, N. K. and Breaugh, J. (2004). Family friendly policies, supervisor support, work family conflict, family work conflict and satisfaction: A test of a conceptual model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 197-220.
    • Fullin, G. (2002). Job precariousness and income instability: The strategies of non-permanent workers and the role of household as a protection against risk. In Zeytinoglu, I. U. (ed), Flexible work arrangements: Conceptualizations and international experiences. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, pp. 127-146.
    • Gajendran, R. S. and Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1524-1541.
    • Glass, J. and Finley, A. (2002). Coverage and effectiveness of family-responsive workplace policies. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 313-337.
    • Glass, J. and Riley, L. (1998). Family responsive policies and employee retention following childbirth. Social Forces, 76, 1401-1435.
    • Golden, T. (2007). Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations, 60, 1641-1667.
    • Golden, T., Veiga, J. and Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommuting's differential impact on workfamily conflict: Is there no place like home? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1340-1350.
    • Golembiewski, R., Hilles, R. and Kagno, M. (1974). A longitudinal study of flexi-time effects: Some consequences of an OD structural intervention. Journal of Applied Behavioural Sciences, 10, 503-532.
    • Golembiewski, R. and Proehl, C. (1978). A survey of the empirical literature on flexible work hours: Character and consequences of a major innovation. Academy of Management Review, 3, 837-853.
    • Goodstein, J. (1995). Employer involvement in eldercare: An organizational adaptation perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1657-1671.
    • Goodstein, J. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 350-382.
    • Gray, D. (1989). Gender and organizational commitment among hospital nurses. Human Relations, 42, 801-813.
    • Greene, C. N. (1984). Effects of alternative work schedules: A field experiment. Academy of Management.
    • Gregory, A. and Milner, S. (2009). Work-life balance a matter of choice? Gender, Work and Organization, 16, 1-13.
    • Guest, D. (2002). Human resource management, corporate performance and employee wellbeing: building the worker into HRM. The Journal of Industrial Relations, 44, 335-358.
    • Hackman, J.R. and Oldham, G.R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170.
    • Halpern, D. (2005). How time-flexible work practices can reduce stress, improve health and save money. Stress and Health, 21, 157-168.
    • Hannah, R. (1994). The trade-off between worker mobility and employer flexibility: Recent evidence and implication. Employee Benefits Journal, 19, 23-25.
    • Harley, B., Allen, B. C. and Sargent, L. D. (2007). High performance work systems and employee experience of work in the service sector: The case of aged care. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45, 607-633.
    • Harrick, E., Vanek, G. and Michlitsch, J. (1986). Alternate work schedules, productivity, leave usage and employee attitudes: A field study. Public Personnel Management, 15, 159-207.
    • Harris, L. and Foster, C. (2005). Small, flexible and family friendly - work practices in service sector businesses. London: Department of Trade and Industry. Employment Relations Research Series No. 47.
    • Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L. and Hayes, T.L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.
    • Harvey, B. and Luthans, F. (1979). Flexitime: An empirical analysis of its real meaning and impact. MSU Business Topics, 27, 31-36.
    • Healy, G. (2004). Work-life balance and family friendly policies - in whose interest? Work, Employment and Society, 18, 219-223.
    • Hill, E., Mead, N., Dean, L., Hafen, D., Gadd, R., Palmer, A. and Ferris, M. (2006). Researching the 60-hour dual-earner workweek: An alternative to the 'opt-out revolution'. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1184-1203.
    • Hill, E. J., Ferris, M. and Martinson, V. (2003). Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 220-241.
    • Hill, E. J., Miller, B., Weiner, S. and Colihan, J. (1998). Influences of the virtual office on aspects of work and work/life balance. Personnel Psychology, 51, 667-683.
    • Hogarth, T., Hasluck, C. and Pierre, G. (2001). Work-life balance 2000: Results from the Baseline Study. Department of Education and Employment.
    • Hohl, K. (1996). The effects of flexible working arrangements. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7, 69-86.
    • Holman, D., Frankel, S., Sorensen, O. and Wood, S. (2009). Work design variation and outcomes in call centres: Strategic choice and institutional explanations. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 62, 510-532.
    • Hooker, H., Neathey, F., Casebourne, J. and Munro, M. (2007). The Third Work-Life Balance Employee Survey: Main findings. Institute for Employment Studies.
    • Hughes, J. and Bozionelos, N. (2007). Work-life balance as a source of dissatisfaction and withdrawal attitudes: An exploratory study on the views of male workers. Personnel Review, 36, 145-154.
    • Hung, R. (1996). An annotated bibliography of compressed workweeks. International Journal of Manpower, 17, 43-53.
    • Hyland, M., Rowsome, C. and Rowsome, E. (2005). The integrative effects of flexible work arrangements and preferences for segmenting or integrating work and home roles. Journal of Behavior and Applied Management, 6, 141-160.
    • Johnson, E. N., Lowe, D. J. and Reckers, P. M. J. (2008). Alternative work arrangements and perceived career success: Current evidence from the big four firms in the US. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 48-72.
    • Kalbers, L. P. and Cenker, W. J. (2008). The impact of exercised responsibility, experience, autonomy and role ambiguity on job performance in public accounting. Journal of Managerial Issues, XX, 327-347.
    • Karasek, R. (1989). Control in the workplace and its health-related aspects. In Sauter, S. L., Hurrell, J. J. J. and Cooper, C. L. (eds), Job control and worker health. London: Wiley, pp. 129-159.
    • Karasek, R. A. Jr (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285-308.
    • Karatepe, O. and Tekinkus, M. (2006). The effects of work-family conflict, emotional exhaustion, and intrinsic motivation on job outcomes of front-line employees. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24, 173-193.
    • Kauffeld, S., Jonas, E. and Frey, D. (2004). Effects of a flexible work-time design on employee and company related aims. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 79-100.
    • Kelliher, C. and Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63, 83-106.
    • Kelly, E., Kossek, E., Hammer, L., Durham, M., Bray, J., Chermack, K., Murphy, l. and Kaskubar, D. (2008). Getting there from here: Research on the effects of work-family initiatives on work-family conflict and business outcomes. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 305-349.
    • Kelly, E. and Moen, P. (2007). Rethinking the clock work of work: Why schedule control may pay off at work and at home. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 487-506.
    • Kersley B, Alpin C, Forth J, Bryson A, Bewley H, Dix G and Oxenbridge S (2006). Inside the Workplace: Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey, London: Routledge.Kim, J. and Campagna, A. (1981). Effects of flexitime on employee attendance and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 729-741.
    • Konrad, A. and Mangel, R. (2000). The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1225-1237.
    • Kopleman, R. (1985). Alternative work schedules and productivity: A review of the evidence. National Productivity Review, Spring, 150-165.
    • Kossek, E., Lautsch, B. and Eaton, S. (2005). Telecommuting control and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 68, 347-367.
    • Kossek, E. and Lee, M. D. (2008). Implementing a reduced-workload arrangement to retain high talent: A case study. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 11, 49-64.
    • Kossek, E. and Ozeki, C. (1999). Bridging the work-family policy and productivity gap: A literature review. Community, Work and Family, 2, 7-32.
    • Krausz, M. and Freibach, N. (1983). Effects of flexible working time for employed women upon satisfaction, strains, and absenteeism. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56, 155-159.
    • Kraut, R. (1989). Telecommuting: The trade off of home work. Journal of Communication, 39, 19-47.
    • Kurland, N. and Bailey, D. (1999). Telework: The advantages of working here, there, anywhere and anytime. Organizational Dynamics, 28, 53-68.
    • Lapierre, L. and Allen, T. (2006). Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits and problem-focused coping: Implications for work-family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11, 169-181.
    • Lautsch, B.A., Kossel, E.E., Eaton, S.C. (2009). Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations, 62, 795-827.
    • Lewis, S., Smithson, J., Cooper, C. and Dyer, J. (2001), Flexible futures: Flexible working and work-life integration: Summary of findings from stage 2., available at: www.workliferesearch.org.
    • Lewis, S. and Taylor, K. (1996). Evaluating the impact of 'family friendly' employment policies. In Lewis, S. and Lewis, J. (eds), The work family challenge: Rethinking employment. London: Sage, pp. 112-127.
    • Lewis, Suzan (2003). The integration of paid work and the rest of life. Is post-industrial work the new leisure? Leisure Studies, 22, 343-345.
    • Lewis, Suzan, Gambles, R. and Rapoport, R. (2007). The constraints of a 'work-life balance' approach: an international perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 360-373.
    • Lightbody, M. (2008). No time to stand and stare: Imagery of flexible work arrangements in Australian professional accounting journals. Pacific Accounting Review, 20, 138-157.
    • Lodahl, T.M. and Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24-33.
    • MacEachen, E., Polzer, J. and Clarke, J. (2008). You are free to set your own hours: Governing worker productivity and health through flexibility and resilience. Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1019-1033.
    • Macky, K. and Boxall, P. (2008). High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being: A study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46, 38-55.
    • Macky, K. and Boxall, P. (2007). The relationship between 'high performance work practices' and employee attitudes: An investigation of additive and interaction effects. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 537-567.
    • Madsen, S. (2006). Work and family conflict: Can home-based teleworking make a difference? International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9, 307-350.
    • Madsen, S. (2003). The effects of home-based teleworking on work-family conflict. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14, 35-58.
    • Mahajan, R. and Foggin, N. (2006), Flexible working: Can your company compete without it?, available at: www.btglobalservices.com.
    • Martinez-Sanchez, A., Perez-Perez, M., Luis-Carnicer, P. and Vela-Jimenez, M. (2008). Teleworking adoption, change management and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21, 7-31.
    • Martinez-Sanchez, A., Perez-Perez, M., Luis-Carnicer, P. and Vela-Jimenez, M. (2007b). Teleworking and workplace flexibility: A study of impact on firm performance. Personnel Review, 36, 42-64.
    • Martinez-Sanchez, A., Perez-Perez, M., Luis-Carnicer, P. and Vela-Jimenez, M. (2007a). Telework, human resource flexibility and firm performance. New Technology, Work and Performance, 22, 208-223.
    • Maxwell, G., Rankine, L., Bell, S. and MacVicar, A. (2007). The incidence and impact of flexible working arrangements in smaller businesses. Employee Relations, 29, 138-152.
    • McCampbell, A. (1996). Benefits achieved through alternative work schedules. Human Resource Planning, 19, 30-37.
    • McDonald, P., Pini, B. and Bradley, L. (2007). Freedom or fallout in local government? How work-life culture impacts employees using flexible work practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 602-622.
    • de Menezes, L.M. and Kelliher C. (2011). Flexible working arrangements and performance: summary of the evidence for a business case; available at: http://cassknowledge.com/article.php?id=539.
    • Meyer, J.P. and Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 29.
    • Meyer, C., Mukerjee, S. and Sestero, A. (2001). Work-family benefits: Which ones maximise profits? Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 28-44.
    • Mohr, R. D. and Zoghi, C. (2008). High involvement management work design and job satisfaction. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 61, 275-296.
    • Moon, S.Y. and Roh, J.H. (2010). Balancing Work and Family in South Korea's Public Organizations: Focusing on Family-Friendly Policies in Elementary School Organizations', Public Personnel Management, 39, 117-131.
    • Moore, J. (2006). Homeworking and work-life balance: Does it add to quality of life? European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 56, 5-13.
    • Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus User's Guide. Fifth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Rodgers, C. (1992). The flexible workplace: What have we learned? Human Resource Management, 31, 183-199.
    • Shepard III, E., Clifton, T. and Kruse, D. (1996). Flexible working hours and productivity: Some evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Relations, 35, 123-139.
    • Shinn, M., Wong, N., Simko, P. and Ortiz-Torres, B. (1989). Promoting the well-being of working parents: Coping, social support, and flexible job schedules. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 31-55.
    • Shockley, K. and Allen, T. (2007). When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexibility work arrangements and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 479-493.
    • Skyrme, D. (1994). Flexible working: Building a responsive organisation. Long Range Planning, 27, 98-110.
    • Smith, P. and Wedderburn, A. (1998). Flexibility and long shifts. Employee Relations, 20, 483- 489.
    • Sparks, K. Faragher, B. and Cooper, C. (2001). Well-being and occupational health in the 21st century workplace. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 74, 489-509.
    • Staples, D. S. (2001). A study of remote workers and their differences from non-remote workers. Journal End User Computing, 13, 3-14.
    • Stavrou, E. T. (2005). Flexible work bundles and organizational competitiveness: A crossnational study of the European work context. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 26, 923- 947.
    • Takeuchi, R., Chen, G. and Lepak, D. P. (2009). Through the looking glass of a social system: Cross-level effects of high-performance work systems on employees' attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 62, 1-29.
    • Thomas, L. T. and Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on workfamily conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 6-15.
    • Thompson, C., Beauvais, L. and Lyness, K. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, family attachment and workfamily conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392-415.
    • Tietze, S. and Musson, G. (2005). Recasting the home-work relationship: A case of mutual adjustment. Organization Studies, 26, 1331-1352.
    • Tomlinson, J. (2007). Employment regulation, welfare and gender regimes: A comparative analysis of women's working time patterns and work life balance in the UK and US. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 401-415.
    • Trent, J., Smith, A. and Wood, D. (1994). Telecommuting: Stress and social support. Psychological Reports, 74, 1312-1314.
    • Vega, A. and Gilbert, M. (1997). Longer days, shorter weeks: Compressed work weeks in policing. Public Personnel Management, 26, 391-402.
    • Venne, R. (1997). The impact of the compressed workweek on absenteeism. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 52, 382-400.
    • Wall, T., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Sheehan, M., Wood, S., Clegg, C. and West, M. (2004). On the validity of reported company financial performance. Personnel Psychology, 57, 95-118.
    • Wallace, J. and Young, M. (2008). Parenthood and productivity: A study of demands, resources and family-friendly firms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 110-122.
    • Wang, P. and Walumbwa, F. (2007). Family friendly programs, organizational commitment and work withdrawal: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Personnel Psychology, 60, 397-413. Warr, P. (2007). Work, Happiness, and Unhappiness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • Whitehouse, G., Haynes, M., MacDonald, F. and Arts, D. (2007). Re-assessing the familyfriendly workplace: Trends and influences in Britain 1998-2004. London, UK: Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. Employment Relations Research Series, 76.
    • Wiley, D. (1987). The relationship between work/nonwork role conflict and job-related outcomes: Some unanticipated findings. Journal of Management, 13, 467-472.
    • Wise, S. and Bond, S. (2003). Work-life policy: Does it do exactly what is says on the tin? Women in Management Review, 18, 20-31.
    • Wood, S. and De Menezes, L. (2007). Family-friendly, equal-opportunity and high-involvement management in Britain. In Boxall, P., Purcell, J. and Wright, P. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 581-598.
    • Wood, S. and de Menezes, L. M. (2008). Comparing perspectives on high involvement management and organizational performance across the British economy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 639-682.
    • Wood, S. J., De Menezes, L. M. and Lasaosa, A. (2003). Family-friendly management in Great Britain: Testing various perspectives. Industrial Relations, 42, 221-250.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article