Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BJ, H1
Whilst claims about the ethicality of shale gas development via hydraulic fracturing (‘fracking’) are commonplace in everyday discourse, little scholarly attention has been afforded explicitly to this aspect of unconventional fossil fuel extraction. The limited research that speaks to ethical considerations largely describes ethical concerns associated with development – extremely few claims in research literature make an ethical case for development. The most common ethical concerns cited in research stem from issues of distributive justice, with procedural justice, the precautionary principle, exposure to involuntary risks, rights-based arguments, and changes in community character and way of life as next most common. Additional research hints implicitly at ethical dilemmas associated with shale gas development, but does not openly identify these issues as having moral implications. Many ethical considerations relate closely to concerns about water quality and the volume/supply of water available for other purposes. The limited scholarship in this area reveals the import of understanding the ways in which ethics permeate thoughts about shale gas development for designing policy that responds to constituent needs and concerns. Even more limited than research on ethical claims in association with shale gas development is well-reasoned scholarship that analyses the extent to which ethical claims about development are well justified and philosophically justifiable. A comprehensive and systematic analysis of the range of ethical claims potentially relevant to shale gas development and their usefulness for informing policy on this topic would contribute greatly to informed decision-making on this controversial issue – something that science alone cannot achieve.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Sovacool B, Dworkin M. Energy justice: Conceptual insights and practical applications. Applied Energy 2015, 142:435-444.
    • [2] Evensen D, Stedman R, O'Hara S, Humphrey M. Differences and similarities in perceptions of 'fracking' between the UK and US. (In review.)
    • [3] Evensen D. Fractured discourse: Social representations of shale gas development via hydraulic fracturing. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, 2014.
    • [4] Wolske K, Hoffman A. Public perceptions of high-volume hydraulic fracturing and deep shale gas development. Graham Sustainability Institute Integrated Assessment Report Series, Volume 2, Report 8, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2013, 36.
    • [5] Evensen D, Jacquet J, Clarke C, Stedman R. What's the 'fracking' problem? One word can't say it all. The Extractive Industries and Society 2014, 1:130-136.
    • [6] Evensen D. Policy decisions on shale gas development ('fracking'): The insufficiency of science and the necessity of moral thought. Environmental Values 2015, 24:511-534.
    • [7] Vasi I, Walker E, Johnson J, Tan H. “No fracking way!” Documentary film, discursive opportunity, and local opposition against hydraulic fracturing in the United States, 2010 to 2013. American Sociological Review 2015, 80:934-959.
    • [8] Jaspal R, Nerlich B. Fracking in the UK press: Threat dynamics in an unfolding debate. Public Understanding of Science 2014, 23:348-363.
    • [9] Jaspal R, Turner A, Nerlich B. Fracking on YouTube: Exploring risks, benefits and human values. Environmental Values 2014, 23:501-527.
    • [10] Lamont J, Favor C. Distributive justice. In Zalta E, ed, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-distributive/ (accessed September 20 2015)
    • [11] Cotton M. Shale gas-community relations: NIMBY or not? Integrating social factors into shale gas community engagements. Natural Gas and Electricity 2013, 29(9):8-12.
    • [12] Fry M, Briggle A, Kincaid J. Fracking and environmental (in)justice in a Texas city. Ecological Economics 2015, 117:97-107.
    • [13] Hardy K, Kelsey T. Local income related to Marcellus shale activity in Pennsylvania. Community Development 2015, 46:329-340.
    • [15] Willow A, Wylie S. Politics, ecology, and the new anthropology of energy: Exploring the emerging frontiers of hydraulic fracking. Journal of Political Ecology 2014, 21:222-236.
    • [16] Malin S. There's no real choice but to sign: Neoliberalization and normalization of hydraulic fracturing on Pennsylvania farmland. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2014, 4(1):17-27.
    • [17] Hotaling A. The moral layers of fracking: From basic rights and obligations to human flourishing. Thesis, University of Montana, Missoula, 2013.
    • [18] Rawls J. A theory of justice. Revised edition. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999, 538.
    • [19] Pennsylvania Interfaith Power and Light. Principles for considering Marcellus shale drilling: An ethical analysis. http://www.keystonebusiness.net/paipl/index_files/ marcellus.htm (accessed September 20 2015)
    • [20] The Diocese of Blackburn. Environmental issues - fracking. http://www.blackburn. anglican.org/more_info.asp?current_id=469 (accessed on September 20 2015)
    • [21] Upper Susquehanna Synod ELCA Assembly. Final report of the horizontal slickwater hydraulic fracturing task force. 2014. http://www.uss-elca.org/forcongregations/fracking-resources/ (accessed on September 20 2015)
    • [22] Finkel M, Hays J, Law A. Modern natural gas development and harm to health: The need for proactive public health policies. ISRN Public Health 2013:1-5.
    • [23] de Wit M. The great shale debate in the Karoo. South African Journal of Science 2011, 107(7/8):1-9.
    • [24] Lewens T. Introduction. In Lewens T, ed, Risk: Philosophical perspectives. Routledge, London, 2007, 1-20.
    • [25] Cranor C. Toward a non-consequentialist approach to acceptable risks. In Lewens T, ed, Risk: Philosophical perspectives. Routledge, London, 2007, 36-53.
    • [26] de Melo-Martín I, Hays J, Finkel M. The role of ethics in shale gas policies. Science of the Total Environment 2014, 470:1114-1119.
    • [27] Hansson S. Philosophical perspectives on risk. Techné 2004, 8(1):10-35.
    • [28] Commission of the European Communities. Communication for the Commission on the precautionary principle. Brussels, 2000, 29. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf (accessed on September 20 2015)
    • [29] Löfstedt R. The swing of the regulatory pendulum in Europe: From precautionary principle to (regulatory) impact analysis. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2004, 28:233-260.
    • [30] Finkel M, Hays J. The implications of unconventional drilling for natural gas: A global public health concern. Public Health 2013, 127:889-893.
    • [31] Law A, Hays J, Shonkoff S, Finkel M. Public Health England's draft report on shale gas extraction: Mistaking best practices for actual practices. BMJ 2014, 348:2728.
    • [32] Kovats S, Depledge M, Haines A, Fleming L, Wilkinson P, Shonkoff S, Scovronick N. The health implications of fracking. The Lancet 2014, 383:757-758.
    • [33] Ozonoff D. The precautionary principle as a screening device. In Raffensperger C, Tickner J, eds, Protecting public health and the environment: Implementing the precautionary principle. Island Press, Washington, DC, 1999, 100-105.
    • [34] Harremoës P, Gee D, MacGarvin M, Stirling A, Keys J, et al. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2001.
    • [35] Sandin P. Dimensions of the precautionary principle, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 1999, 5:889-907.
    • [36] Hansson S. Risk and ethics: Three approaches. In Lewens T, ed, Risk: Philosophical perspectives. Routledge, London, 2007, 21-35.
    • [37] Ingle M, Atkinson D. Can the circle be squared? An enquiry into shale gas mining in South Africa's Karoo. Development Southern Africa 2015, 32:539-554.
    • [38] Short D, Elliot J, Norder K, Lloyd-Davies E, Morley J. Extreme energy, 'fracking' and human rights: A new field for human rights impact assessments. The International Journal of Human Rights 2015, 19(6):1-40.
    • [39] Nickel J. Making sense of human rights. Second edition. Blackwell, Oxford, 2007, 138.
    • [41] His Holiness Pope Francis. Laudato Si': On care for our common home. http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papafrancesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html (accessed on September 20 2015)
    • [42] United Nations General Assembly. Resolution A/RES/64/292: The human right to water and sanitation. http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/human_right_to_water.shtml (accessed January 20 2016)
    • [43] Pearson T. Frac sand mining in Wisconsin: Understanding emerging conflicts and community organizing. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment 2013, 35:30-40.
    • [44] Hurka T. Perfectionism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
    • [45] Wall S. Perfectionism in moral and political philosophy, In Zalta E, ed, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/perfectionism-moral/ (accessed September 20 2015)
    • [46] Parfit D. Overpopulation and the quality of life. In Singer P, ed, Applied Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986.
    • [47] Cavell S. Cities of words: Pedagogical letters on a register of moral life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004.
    • [48] Guyer P. Examples of perfectionism. Journal of Aesthetic Education 2014, 48(3):5-27.
    • [49] Patton P. Cavell and Rawls on the conversation of justice: Moral versus political perfectionism. Conversations: The Journal of Cavellian Studies 2014, 2:54-74.
    • [50] Cavell S. Conditions handsome and unhandsome: The constitution of Emersonian perfectionism. Second edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991.
    • [55] Duggan-Haas D, Ross R, Allmon W. The science beneath the surface: A very short guide to the Marcellus Shale. Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, NY, 2013.
    • [57] Hudgins A, Poole A. Framing fracking: Private property, common resources, and regimes of governance. Journal of Political Ecology 2014, 21:303-319.
    • [58] Mercer A, de Rijke K, Dressler W. Silence in the midst of the boom: Coal seam gas, neoliberalizing discourse, and the future of regional Australia. Journal of Political Ecology 2014, 21:279-302.
    • [59] Howarth R, Santoro R, Ingraffea A. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change 2011, 106:679-690.
    • [60] Weber C, Clavin C. Life Cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: Review of evidence and implications. Environmental Science & Technology 2012, 46:5688-5695.
    • [61] Jenner S, Lamadrid A. Shale gas vs. coal: Policy implication from environmental impact comparisons of shale gas, conventional gas, and coal on air, water, and land in the United States. Energy Policy 2013, 53:442-453.
    • [62] Allen D, et al. Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2013, 110:17768-17773.
    • [63] Alvarez R, Pacala S, Winebrake J, Chameides W, Hamburg S. Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2012, 109:6435-6440.
    • [64] Zavala-Araiza D, et al. Toward a functional definition of methane super-emitters: Application to natural gas production sites. Environmental Science & Technology 2015, 49:8167-8174.
    • [65] Newell R, Raimi D. Implications of shale gas development for climate change. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48:8360-8368.
    • [78] Sher G. Beyond neutrality. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997.
    • [79] Westra L. Virtue ethics as foundational for a global ethic. In Sandler R, Cafaro P, eds, Environmental virtue ethics. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD, 2005, 79-91.
    • [80] Shrader-Frechette K. Risk and rationality: Philosophical foundations for populist reforms. California University Press, Berkeley, 1991.
    • [81] Cranor C. Regulating toxic substances: A philosophy of science and the law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
    • [82] Nozick R. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books, New York, 1974.
    • [83] Pogge T. World poverty and human rights. 2nd edition. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008.
    • [84] Shrader-Frechette K. Environmental justice: Creating equality, reclaiming democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002.
    • [85] Peterson M, Hansson S. On the application of rights-based moral theories to siting controversies. Journal of Risk Research 2004, 7:269-275.
    • [86] Gross C. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2727-2736.
    • [87] Boholm Å, Löfstedt R, eds. Facility siting: Risk, power and identity in land use planning. Earthscan, London, 2004.
    • [88] Connolly P, Althaus R, Skipper R. Fracking under pressure. http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/environmental_ethics/frackingexemptions.html (accessed on September 20 2015)
    • [89] Hulme K, Short D. Ecocide and the 'polluter pays' principle: The case of fracking. Environmental Scientist April 2014, 7-10.
    • [90] Potter A, Rashid M. An ethical approach to hydraulic fracturing. American Society for Engineering Education Southeast Section Conference 2013. se.asee.org/proceedings/ASEE2013/Papers2013/156.PDF (accessed on 20 September 2015)
    • [92] North D, Stern P, Webler T, Field P. Public and stakeholder participation for managing and reducing the risks of shale gas development. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48:8388-8396.
    • [93] Spence D. Responsible shale gas production: Moral outrage vs. cool analysis. Fordham Environmental Law Review 2013-2014, 141-190.
    • [94] Chan K, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 2012, 74:8-18.
    • [95] Russell B. A history of western philosophy. Simon and Schuster, New York, 1959.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article