LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mann, Jonathan (2016)
Publisher: Cass School of Education and Communities, University of East London
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
Identifiers:doi:10.15123/PUB.5642
As a tutor of academic writing in a university committed to widening student participation, I frequently assist students in making sense of the feedback they have received on their essays. Students simultaneously have to learn how to improve their knowledge of their subject whilst also understanding the general conventions of academic writing in their area. It is an emotional as much as intellectual process (van der Hulst et al. 2014). Combining qualitative data from staff and student focus groups with quantitative data from the Turnitin system, this action research report provides a series of practical resources rooted in practice reflections and current debates, as a possible way to tackle this pedagogical problem
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agius, N. M. & Wilkinson, A. (2014). Students' and teachers' views of wrietn Kemmis, S. and McTaggart, R. (2001) 'Participatory Action Research.' In: feedback at undergraduate level: a literature revieNwu.rse Education Today , (4)34, 552-9.
    • Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y., (eds.)The Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd Amos, K. & McGowan, U. (2012). 'Integrating academic reading and writing skills development with core content in science and engineerinJogu'.rnal of Learning Development in Higher Education . Online: htp://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/ ojs/index.php?journal=jldhe&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=189 [accessed 19 April 2016] Ball, E. (2010) 'Annotation an eefctive device for student feedback: A critical review of the literatureN'.urse Education in Practice, (10)3,138-143.
    • (2012). A marked improvement. York: Higher Education Academy. Online: htps://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/a_marked_improvement.pdf [accessed 22 April 2016] Biggs, J. B. and Tang, C. (2011)Teaching for Quality Learning at University.
    • Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher Jossey-Bass.
    • . San Francisco: Buckley, E. & Cowap, L. (2013). 'An evaluation of the use of Turnitin for electronic submission and marking and as a formative feedback tool from an educator's perspective'. British Journal of Educational Technology , 44, 562-70.
    • Cotrell, S. (2015). Learning and Teaching Strategy 2015-20: 'Learning by doing'. Online: htps://www.uel.ac.uk/wwwmedia/services/celt/fouzia/UELLearning-and-Teaching-Strategy-2015-20-LTC-June-2015.docx [accessed 3 May 2016] Cole, M. (2005) 'Puting culture in the middle'. In Daniels, H (ed.)An Introduction to Vygotsky (2nd edn). pp. 199-226. London and New York: Routledge.
    • Elliot, J. (1991) Action Research for Educational Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Fitzpatrick, N., Hayes, N., O'Rourke, K.C. (2009). 'Beyond constriction and control: Constructivism in online theory and practice'. In Payne, C. (ed.).
    • Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks. pp. 14-26. Hershey, New York: Information Science Reference.
    • Fry, H, Keetridge, S, Marshall, S (2014) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing academic practice. London: Routledge.
    • Hatie, J., and Timperley, H. (2007) 'The Power of Feedback'. Review of Educational Research , (77)1, 81-112 Hatziapostolou, T. & Paraskakis, I. (2010). 'Enhancing the impact of formative feedback on student learning through an online feedback systeEmle'c.tronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(2), 111-22.
    • Helpful Hints for Conducting A Focus Group (2015). Available at: htp://web.
    • pdf?redirected [accessed 4 April 2016] edn). pp. 567-605. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
    • Koshy, V. (2005) Action research for improving practice: a practical guide.
    • Lavelle, E. and Zuercher, N. (2001). 'The Writing Approaches of University Students'. Higher Education , (42)3, pp. 373-91.
    • Lea, M. and Street, B. (2009) 'The “academic literacies” model: theory and applications'. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368-77.
    • Lewin, K. (1946), 'Action Research and Minority Problems',Journal of Social Issues, (2): 34-46.
    • Scopus Search Results (2016a). Available at: htp://tinyurl.com/jp4t3f8 [accessed 14th December 2016] Scopus Search Results (2016b). Available at: htp://tinyurl.com/hho34jj Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setings.
    • Turnitin (2016). Available at htp://www.turnitin.com [accessed: 22 February 2016] University of East London (UEL) (2013) Appendix 6: E-submission Guidelines. Online: htp://www.uel.ac.uk/wwwmedia/internal/qa/ assessmentandfeedbackpolicy/Appendix6_Assessment-Policy-1.doc [accessed 19 April 2016] UEL (2015a). 'Corporate Plan 2015-2020'. Internal report. Unpublished.
    • UEL (2015b). 'Assessment and Feedback Policy'. Online: htp://www.uel.ac.uk/ qa/policies/assessmentpolicy [accessed 14 December 2015] UEL (2016). 'Frequently asked questions [on Turnitin] for students'. Online:
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article