Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Crabtree, N.J.; Shaw, N.J.; Bishop, N.J.; Adams, J.E.; Mughal, M.Z.; Arundel, P.; Fewtrell, M.S.; Ahmed, S.F.; Treadgold, L.A.; Högler, W.; Bebbington, N.A.; Ward, K.A.; ALPHABET Study Team, . (2017)
Publisher: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
Languages: English
Types: Article

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: musculoskeletal diseases
The increasing use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in children has led to the need for robust reference data for interpretation of scans in daily clinical practice. Such data need to be representative of the population being studied and be “future-proofed” to software and hardware upgrades. The aim was to combine all available pediatric DXA reference data from seven UK centers to create reference curves adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and body size to enable clinical application, using in vivo cross-calibration and making data back and forward compatible. Seven UK sites collected data on GE Lunar or Hologic Scanners between 1996 and 2012. Males and females aged 4 to 20 years were recruited (n = 3598). The split by ethnic group was white 2887; South Asian 385; black Afro-Caribbean 286; and mixed heritage 40. Scans of the total body and lumbar spine (L1 to L4) were obtained. The European Spine Phantom was used to cross-calibrate the 7 centers and 11 scanners. Reference curves were produced for L1 to L4 bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) and total body less head (TBLH) and L1 to L4 areal bone mineral density (aBMD) for GE Lunar Prodigy and iDXA (sex- and ethnic-specific) and for Hologic (sex-specific). Regression equations for TBLH BMC were produced using stepwise linear regression. Scans of 100 children were randomly selected to test backward and forward compatibility of software versions, up to version 15.0 for GE Lunar and Apex 4.1 for Hologic. For the first time, sex- and ethnic-specific reference curves for lumbar spine BMAD, aBMD, and TBLH aBMD are provided for both GE Lunar and Hologic scanners. These curves will facilitate interpretation of DXA data in children using methods recommended in ISCD guidelines. The databases have been created to allow future updates and analysis when more definitive evidence for the best method of fracture prediction in children is agreed. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Crabtree NJ, Arabi A, Bachrach LK, Fewtrell M, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Kecskemethy HH, et al. Dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting in children and adolescents: the revised 2013 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2014; 17(2):225-42. [PubMed: 24690232]
    • 2. Gordon CM, Leonard MB, Zemel BS, International Society for Clinical D. 2013 Pediatric Position Development Conference: executive summary and reflections. J Clin Densitom. 2014; 17(2):219- 24. [PubMed: 24657108]
    • 3. Bishop N, Arundel P, Clark E, Dimitri P, Farr J, Jones G, et al. Fracture prediction and the definition of osteoporosis in children and adolescents: the ISCD 2013 Pediatric Official Positions. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2014; 17(2):275-80. [PubMed: 24631254]
    • 4. Carter D, Bouxsein M, Marcus R. New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data. J Bone Miner Res. 1992; 7:137-45. [PubMed: 1570758]
    • 5. Kroger H, Vainio P, Nieminen J, Kotaniemi A. Comparison of different models for interpreting bone mineral density measurements using DXA and MRI technology. Bone. 1995; 17(2 SU -):157-9. [PubMed: 8554924]
    • 6. Zemel BS, Kalkwarf HJ, Gilsanz V, Lappe JM, Oberfield S, Shepherd JA, et al. Revised reference curves for bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density according to age and sex for black and non-black children: results of the bone mineral density in childhood study. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2011; 96(10):3160-9. [PubMed: 21917867]
    • 7. Zemel BS, Leonard MB, Kelly A, Lappe JM, Gilsanz V, Oberfield S, et al. Height adjustment in assessing dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of bone mass and density in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 95(3):1265-73. [PubMed: 20103654]
    • 8. Crabtree NJ, Hogler W, Shaw NJ. Fractures in children with chronic inflammatroy and/or disabling conditions: The SNAP study. Osteoporos Int. 2014; 25(Suppl 6):S670.
    • 9. Hogler W, Briody J, Woodhead HJ, Chan A, Cowell CT. Importance of lean mass in the interpretation of total body densitometry in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2003; 143(1):81-8. [PubMed: 12915829]
    • 10. Schoenau E. The "functional muscle-bone unit": a two-step diagnostic algorithm in pediatric bone disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005; 20(3):356-9. [PubMed: 15688231]
    • 11. Pludowski P, Lebiedowski M, Olszaniecka M, Marowska J, Matusik H, Lorenc RS. Idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis--an analysis of the muscle-bone relationship. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17(11): 1681-90. [PubMed: 16951909]
    • 12. Landin L. Fracture patterns in children. Analysis of 8,682 fractures with special reference to incidence, etiology and secular changes in a Swedish urban population 1950-1979. Acta Orthop Scan Suppl. 1983; 202:1-109.
    • 13. Cole TJ, Freeman J, Preece M. Body mass reference curves for the UK, 1990. Archives of disease in childhood. 1995; 73(1):25-9. [PubMed: 7639544]
    • 14. Cole TJ, Freeman JV, Preece MA. British 1990 growth reference centiles for weight, height, body mass index and head circumference fitted by maximum penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1998; 17(4):407-29. [PubMed: 9496720]
    • 15. Freeman J, Cole TJ, Chinn S, Jones P, White E, Preece M. Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990. Archives of disease in childhood. 1995; 73(1):17-24. [PubMed: 7639543]
    • 16. Ward KA, Ashby RL, Roberts SA, Adams JE, Zulf Mughal M. UK reference data for the Hologic QDR Discovery dual-energy x ray absorptiometry scanner in healthy children and young adults aged 6-17 years. Archives of disease in childhood. 2007; 92(1):53-9. [PubMed: 16943261]
    • 17. Ott S. Bone Mineral Apparent Density: Washington State University. 2005 [cited 2016 10 June] Available from: https://courses.washington.edu/bonephys/opBMAD.html.
    • 18. Crabtree NJ, Kibirige MS, Fordham JN, Banks LM, Muntoni F, Chinn D, et al. The relationship between lean body mass and bone mineral content in paediatric health and disease. Bone. 2004; 35(4):965-72. [PubMed: 15454104]
    • 19. Genant H, Grampp S, Gluer C, Faulkner K, Jergas M, Engelke K, et al. Universal standardization for dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res. 1994; 9:1503-14. [PubMed: 7817795]
    • 20. Pearson J, Dequeker J, Henley M, Bright J, Reeve J, Kalender W, et al. European semianthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: Assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. Osteoporos Int. 1995; 2:174-84.
    • 21. Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelehood. Statist Med. 1992; 11:1305-19.
    • 22. Pan H, Cole TJ. A comparison of goodness of fit tests for age-related reference ranges. Stat Med. 2004; 23(11):1749-65. [PubMed: 15160406]
    • 23. van Buuren S, Fredriks M. Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves. Stat Med. 2001; 20(8):1259-77. [PubMed: 11304741]
    • 24. Royston P, Wright EM. Goodness-of-fit statistics for age-specific reference intervals. Stat Med. 2000; 19(21):2943-62. [PubMed: 11042625]
    • 25. Bebbington NA, Chapman D, Shaw NJ, Hogler W, Boivin CM, Crabtree NJ. In-vivo crosscallibration of GE Lunar iDXA and Prodigy bone densitometers in adults and children. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 2012(23(Suppl 5)):S555.
    • 26. Crabtree NJ, Shaw nj, Boivin CM, Oldroyd B, Truscott JG. Paediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 16(12): 2157-67. [PubMed: 16234997]
    • 27. Prentice A, Parsons T, Cole T. Uncritical use of bone mineral density in absorptiometry may lead to size-related artifacts in the identification of bone mineral determinants. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994; 60:837-42. [PubMed: 7985621]
    • 28. Krueger D, Libber J, Sanfilippo J, Yu HJ, Horvath B, Miller CG, et al. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms. J Clin Densitom. 2015
    • 29. Shepherd JA, Fan B, Lu Y, Wu XP, Wacker WK, Ergun DL, et al. A multinational study to develop universal standardization of whole-body bone density and composition using GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic DXA systems. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27(10):2208-16. [PubMed: 22623101]
    • 30. Schoeller DA, Tylavsky FA, Baer DJ, Chumlea WC, Earthman CP, Fuerst T, et al. QDR 4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer underestimates fat mass in comparison with criterion methods in adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 81(5):1018-25. [PubMed: 15883424]
    • 31. Crabtree NJ, Hogler W, Cooper MS, Shaw NJ. Diagnostic evaluation of bone densitometric size adjustment techniques in children with and without low trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2013; 24(7):2015-24. [PubMed: 23361874]
    • 32. Jones G, Ma D, Cameron F. Bone density interpretation and relevance in Caucasian children aged 9-17 years of age: insights from a population-based fracture study. J Clin Densitom. 2006; 9(2): 202-9. [PubMed: 16785082]
    • 33. Kelly TL, Wilson KE, Heymsfield SB. Dual energy X-Ray absorptiometry body composition reference values from NHANES. PLoS One. 2009; 4(9):e7038. [PubMed: 19753111]
    • 34. Fan B, Shepherd JA, Levine MA, Steinberg D, Wacker W, Barden HS, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry reference data for GE Lunar systems. J Clin Densitom. 2014; 17(3):344-77. [PubMed: 24161789] m i t s e r o r r e d r a
    • E 178 269 tand E .0 .0 S S 0 0 =
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article