LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Rasche, Andreas (2009)
Publisher: Sage Publications Inc
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HF
The United Nations Global Compact is with currently more than 6,000 voluntary participants the world's largest corporate citizenship initiative. This article first analyzes three critical allegations often made against the Compact by looking at the academic and nonacademic literature. (1) The Compact supports the capture of the United Nations by "big business." (2) Its 10 principles are vague and thus hard to implement. (3) The Compact is not accountable due to an absence of verification mechanisms. This article discusses these three allegations and argues that they rest on a misunderstanding of (a) the nature of the Compact as well as its mandate and (b) the goals it tries to achieve. From this discussion of what the Compact is not, the article then outlines a perspective that classifies the initiative as a necessary supplement to incomplete state and nonstate regulatory approaches in order to illustrate what the Compact is.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Amnesty International (2003). Letter to Louise Fréchette raising concerns on UN Global Compact. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://web.amnesty.org.
    • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. (1985). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
    • Baldwin, R., Scott, C., & Hood, C. (1998). A reader on regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Bardach, E., & Kagan, R. A. (1982). Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    • Bigge, D. M. (2004). Bring on the Bluewash - A Social Constructivist Argument Against Using Nike v. Kasky to Attack the UN Global Compact. International Legal Perspectives, 14, 6-21.
    • Birch, D. (2001). Corporate citizenship: Rethinking business beyond corporate social responsibility. In J. Andriof & M. Mcintosh (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate citizenship (pp. 53-65). Sheffield: Greenleaf.
    • Blagescu, M., & Lloyd, R. (2006). 2006 Global accountability report: Holding power to account. London: One World Trust.
    • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
    • Cavanagh, G. F. (2004). Global Business Ethics - Regulation, Code, or Self-Restraint. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 625-642.
    • Centindamar, D., & Husoy, K. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 163-176.
    • Christian Science Monitor (2000). A new Global Compact. Retrieved July 20, 2007, from http://www.csmonitor.com/2000/0908/p10s1.html.
    • Cohen J. (2001). The world's business: The United Nations and the globalization of corporate citizenship. In J. Andriof & M. Macintosh (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate citizenship (pp. 185-197). Sheffield: Greenleaf.
    • Coglianese, C., & Nash, J. (2001). Regulating from the inside: Can environmental management systems achieve policy goals. Washington: Resources for the Future.
    • Deva, S. (2006). Global Compact: A Critique of the UN's 'Public-Private' Partnership for Promoting Corporate Citizenship. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Communication, 34, 107-151.
    • Dingwert, K., & Pattberg, P. (2006). Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics. Global Governance, 12, 185-203.
    • Engardio, P. (2004). Global Compact, little impact. Business Week, 12 July 2004, 86-87.
    • Fort, T. L., & Schipani, C. A. (2002). The Role of the Corporation in Fostering Sustainable Peace. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 35, 389-435..
    • Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2007). Discourse Ethics and Social Accountability: The Ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 187-216.
    • Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. (2008). Opportunities and Problems of Standardized Ethics Initiatives: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 755-773.
    • Global Compact (2003a). HIV/AIDS: Everybody's business. New York: Global Compact Office.
    • Global Compact (2003b). Experiences in management for sustainability. New York: Global Compact Office.
    • Global Compact (2003c). From principles to practice. New York: Global Compact Office.
    • Global Compact (2004). Embedding human rights in business practice. New York: Global Compact Office.
    • Global Compact (2006). Business against corruption: Case stories and examples. New York: Global Compact Office.
    • Global Compact (2007). UN Global Compact annual review. New York: Global Compact Office.
    • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) (2007). Sustainability reporting guidelines on economic, environmental, and social performance v3. Boston: GRI.
    • Goldman Sachs (2007). Introducing GS sustain. London: The Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
    • Hemphill, T. A. (2005). The United Nations Global Compact. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1, 303-316.
    • International Chamber of Commerce (2004, 24 June). The Global Compact: A business perspective, [Press release]. Paris: International Chamber of Commerce.
    • James. B. (2002, 2 September). Partnerships stressed at the summit: Many companies find an opportunity. International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 28 January, 2009, from http://www.iht.com/articles/2002/09/02/joburg_ed3_.php
    • Kell, G. (2003). The Global Compact: Origins, Operations, Progress, Challenges. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 11, 35-49.
    • Kell, G. (2005). The Global Compact: Selected Experiences and Reflections. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 69-79.
    • Kell, G., & Ruggie, J. G. (1999). Global Markets and Social Legitimacy: The Case for the 'Global Compact'. Transnational Corporations, 8, 101-120.
    • Kell, G., & Levin, D. (2003). The Global Compact Network: An Historic Experiment in Learning and Action. Business and Society Review, 108, 151-181.
    • Levy, D. L. (2008). Political Contestation in Global Production Networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943-963.
    • Levy, D. L., & Prakash, A. (2003). Bargains Old and New: Multinational Corporations in Global Governance. Business and Politics, 5(2), 131-150.
    • McIntosh, M., Thomas, R., Leipziger, D., & Coleman, G. (2003). Living corporate citizenship: Strategic routes to socially responsible business. London et al.: FT Prentice Hall.
    • McKinsey & Company (2004). Assessing the Global Compact's impact. New York: Global Compact Office.
    • McKinsey & Company (2007). Shaping the new rules of competition: UN Global Compact participant mirror. London: McKinsey & Company.
    • Murphy, S. D. (2005). Taking Multinational Corporate Codes of Conduct to the Next Level. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43, 388-433.
    • Nash, P. (2003). Global Compact challenges firms. Business Weekly. Retrieved 29 January, 2009, from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-04/08/content_162162.htm.
    • Nolan, J. (2005). The United Nations Global Compact With Business: Hindering or Helping the Protection of Human Rights? The University of Queensland Law Journal, 24, 445-466.
    • Norman, W., & Néron, P. Y. (2008). Citizenship Inc.: Do we Really Want Businesses to Be Good Corporate Citizens? Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(1), 1-26.
    • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
    • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71-88.
    • Poncelet, E. (2003). Resisting Corporate Citizenship: Business-NGO Relations in Multistakeholder Environmental Partnerships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 9, 97- 115.
    • Rasche, A. (2009). Toward a Model to Compare and Analyze Accountability Standards: The Case of the UN Global Compact. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development (in press).
    • Rasche, A., & Esser, D. E. (2006). From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability: Applying Habermasian Discourse Ethics to Accountability Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 251-67.
    • Rizvi, H. (2004). UN pact with business lacks accountability. Global Policy Forum. Retrived 20 July, 2007, from http://www.globalpolicy.org.
    • Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Governance, order and change in world politics. In J. N. Rosenau & E. O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 1-29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Ruggie. J. G. (2001). Global_governance.net: The Global Compact as Learning Network. Global Governance, 7, 371-378.
    • Ruggie, J. G. (2002). Trade, Sustainability and Global Governance. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 27, 297-307.
    • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global Rules and Private Actors: Toward a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16, 505-532.
    • Sethi, S. P. (2003). Global Compact is another exercise in futility. Financial Express. Retrieved 20 July, 2007, from http://www.financialexpress.com/news/global-compact-is-anotherexercise-in-futility/91447.
    • Selznick, P. (1985). Focusing organizational research on regulation. In R. Noll (Ed.), Regulatory policy and the social sciences (pp. 363-367). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Thérien, J. P., & Pouliot, V. (2006). The Global Compact: Shifting the Politics of International Development. Global Governance, 12, 55-75.
    • Transnational Resource and Action Center (TRAC) (2000). Tangled up in blue: Corporate partnerships at the United Nations. San Francisco: TRAC.
    • United Nations (1999, 1 February). Secretary-General address to the World Economic Forum in Davos, [Press Release SG/SM/6881]. New York: United Nations.
    • United Nations (2001, 3 December). Towards global partnerships, [General Assembly Resolution A/56/L.33]. New York: United Nations.
    • United Nations (2004, 24 June). Global compact participants on 'Common Historic Journey' to fairer, more stable world says Secretary-General at UN Summit, [Press Release SG/SM/9383, ECO/69]. New York: United Nations.
    • United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (2005). Implementing the Global Compact: A booklet for inspiration. Copenhagen: UNDP.
    • Waddock, S., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance: Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
    • Webb, K. (2004). Understanding the voluntary code phenomenon. In K. Webb (Ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private governance, the public interest and innovation (pp. 3-32). Ottawa, CA: Carleton University Press.
    • Williams, O. F. (2004). The UN Global Compact: The challenge and the promise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 755-774.
    • Windsor, D. (2007). Toward a Global Theory of Cross-Border and Multilevel Corporate Political Activity. Business and Society, 46(2), 253-278.
    • Zammit, A. (2003). Development at risk: Rethinking UN-Business partnerships. New York: The South Centre and United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
    • Ziegler, O. (2007). Global Compact Membership in Europe and the US: A Case Study of the Automobile Industry. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 26, 55-68.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article