Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Savill, Nicola; Metcalfe, Tim; Ellis, Andrew W.; Jefferies, Elizabeth (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: 3206, 1203, 3205, BF, 3310, 1702
In three immediate serial recall (ISR) experiments we tested the hypothesis that interactive processing between semantics and phonology supports phonological coherence in verbal short-term memory (STM). Participants categorised spoken words in six-item lists as they were presented, according to their semantic or phonological properties, then repeated the items in presentation order (Experiment 1). Despite matched categorisation performance between conditions, semantically-categorised words were correctly recalled more often than phonologically-categorised words. This accuracy advantage in the semantic condition was accompanied by fewer phoneme recombination errors. Comparisons with a no- categorisation ISR baseline (Experiment 2) indicated that, although categorisations were disruptive overall, recombination errors were specifically rarer following semantic cate- gorisation. Experiment 3 replicated the key findings from Experiment 1 and also revealed fewer phonologically-related errors following semantic categorisation compared to a per- ceptual categorisation of high or low pitch. Therefore, augmented activation of semantic representations stabilises the phonological traces of words within verbal short-term memory, in line with the ‘‘semantic binding” hypothesis.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 50 68.
    • Acheson, D. J., MacDonald, M. C., & Postle, B. R. (2011). The effect of concurrent semantic categorization on delayed serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 44 59.
    • Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382 391.
    • Baddeley, A. D., & Ecob, J. R. (1970). Simultaneous acoustic and semantic coding in shortterm memory. Nature, 227, 287 289.
    • Bourassa, D. C., & Besner, D. (1994). Beyond the articulatory loop: A semantic contribution to serial order recall of subspan lists. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 122 125.
    • Buchsbaum, B. R., & Esposito, M. D. (2008). The search for the phonological store: from loop to convolution. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 762 778.
    • Campoy, G., & Baddeley, A. D. (2008). Phonological and semantic strategies in immediate serial recall. Memory, 16, 329 340.
    • Caza, N., & Belleville, S. (1999). Semantic contribution to immediate serial recall using an unlimited set of items: evidence for a multi-level capacity view of short-term memory. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 334 338.
    • Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497 505.
    • Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671 684.
    • Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268 294.
    • Durso, F. T., & Johnson, M. K. (1980). The effects of orienting tasks on recognition, recall, and modality confusion of pictures and words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 416 429.
    • Ellis, A. W. (1980). Errors in speech and short-term memory: The effects of phonemic similarity and syllable position. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 624 634.
    • Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological in influences on serial recognition and serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1 30.
    • Hanley, J. R., & Bakopoulou, E. (2003). Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: a test of the phonological loop model and the feature model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 435 444.
    • Hoffman, P., Jefferies, E., Ehsan, S., Jones, R. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Semantic memory is key to binding phonology: converging evidence from immediate serial recall in semantic dementia and healthy participants. Neuropsychologia, 47, 747 760.
    • Hoffman, P., Jefferies, E., Ehsan, S., Jones, R. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2012). How does linguistic knowledge contribute to short-term memory? Contrasting effects of impaired semantic knowledge and executive control. Aphasiology, 26, 383 403.
    • Hulme, C., Maughan, S., & Brown, Gordon, D. A. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 685 701.
    • Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., & Brown, G. (1995). The role of long term memory mechanisms in memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 527 536.
    • Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Schweickert, R., Brown, Gordon, D. A., Martin, S., & Stuart, G. (1997). Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1217 1232.
    • Jacoby, L. L., & Craik, F. I. M. (1976). Effects of Elaboration of Processing at Encoding and ( I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory (pp. 1 22). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
    • Jacquemot, C., & Scott, S. K. (2006). What is the relationship between phonological shortterm memory and speech processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 480 486.
    • Jefferies, E., Frankish, C. R., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006a). Lexical and semantic binding in verbal short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 81 98.
    • Jefferies, E., Frankish, C. R., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006b). Lexical and semantic influences on item and order memory in immediate serial recognition: evidence from a novel task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 949 964.
    • Jefferies, E., Frankish, C. R., & Noble, K. (2009). Lexical coherence in short-term memory: Quarterly Journal of Experimental
    • Majerus, S. (2013). Language repetition and short-term memory: an integrative framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 357.
    • Majerus, S., Linden, M. Van Der, Mulder, L., Meulemans, T., & Peters, F. (2004). Verbal short-term memory reflects the sublexical organization of the phonological language network: Evidence from an incidental phonotactic learning paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 297 306.
    • Majerus, S., Norris, D. G., & Patterson, K. E. (2007). What does a patient with semantic dementia remember in verbal short-term memory? Order and sound but not words. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 131 151.
    • Majerus, S., & van der Linden, M. (2003). Long-term memory effects on verbal short-term memory: A replication study. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 303 310.
    • Majerus, S., Van der Linden, M., Poncelet, M., & Metz-Lutz, M.-N. (2004). Can phonological and semantic short-term memory be dissociated? Further evidence from landau-kleffner syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 491 512.
    • Martin, N., & Saffran, E. M. (1997). Language and auditory-verbal short-term memory impairments: Evidence for common underlying processes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 641 682.
    • Martin, R. C., Lesch, M. F., & Bartha, M. C. (1999). Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 3 29.
    • Mazuryk, G. F., & Lockhart, R. S. (1974). Negative recency and levels of processing in free recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 28, 114 123.
    • Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2010). Serial and free recall in children can be improved by training: evidence for the importance of phonological and semantic representations in immediate memory tasks. Psychological Science, 21, 1694 700.
    • Papagno, C., Vernice, M., & Cecchetto, C. (2013). Phonology without semantics? Good enough for verbal short-term memory. Evidence from a patient with semantic dementia. Cortex, 49, 626 636.
    • Patterson, K. E., Graham, N., & Hodges, J. R. (1994). The impact of semantic memory loss on phonological representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 57 69.
    • Plaut, D. C., & Kello, C. T. (1999). The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production: a distributed connectionist approach. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 381 415). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Poirier, M., & Saint-Aubin, J. (1995). Memory for related and unrelated words: further evidence on the influence of semantic factors in immediate serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 48, 384 404.
    • Romani, C., McAlpine, S., & Martin, R. C. (2008). Concreteness effects in different tasks: implications for models of short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 292 323.
    • Rose, N. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (2012). A processing approach to the working memory/longterm memory distinction: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1019 1029.
    • Saint-Aubin, J., & Poirier, M. (1999). The influence of long-term memory factors on immediate serial recall: an item and order analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 347 352.
    • Saint-Aubin, J., & Poirier, M. (2000). Immediate serial recall of words and nonwords: Tests of the retrieval-based hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 332 340.
    • Savill, N., Ashton, J., Gugliuzza, J., Poole, C., Sim, Z., Ellis, A. W., & Jefferies, E. (2015). tDCS to temporoparietal cortex during familiarisation enhances the subsequent phonological coherence of nonwords in immediate serial recall. Cortex, 63, 132 144.
    • Schweickert, R. (1993). A multinomial processing tree model for degradation and redintegration. Memory & Cognition, 21, 168 175.
    • Stuart, G., & Hulme, C. (2000). The effects of word co-occurance on short-term memory: Associative links in long-term memory affect short-term memory performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 796 802.
    • Thorn, A. S. C., & Frankish, C. R. (2005). Long-term knowledge effects on serial recall of nonwords are not exclusively lexical. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 729 735.
    • Thorn, A. S. C., Gathercole, S. E., & Frankish, C. R. (2005). Redintegration and the benefits of long-term knowledge in verbal short(1993) multinomial processing tree model. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 133 158.
    • Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In J. Castellan & F. Restle (Eds.), Cognitive Theory Vol. 3 (pp. 200 239). Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Erlbaum.
    • Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038 1066.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects


Cite this article