Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Delsante, Ioanni; Bertolino, N.; Bugatti, A.; Cristina, M.L.
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: NA
The paper is related with a research that was aimed to better define urban quality and sustainability\ud at a district scale (4000-10000 inhabitants), specifically referred to European towns and settlements.\ud An innovative set of indicators (72) has been developed, starting from and taking into consideration\ud also existing literature, both in terms of indicators and sets of indicators (OECD, UN, Agenda 21, and\ud existing European databases as CRISP), four “thematic” areas have been defined dealing with\ud architectural quality, accessibility, environment and services. Within each of these areas some macroindicators\ud and micro-indicators have been defined. The aim is to translate something that is usually\ud considered subjective into something “objective” and finally defined with a number (0-100). Microindicators\ud and macro-indicators are weighted thanks to a mathematical method based on symmetrical\ud matrixes, so that there is a correct balance between different areas. Indicators are both qualitative\ud and quantitative, so they are not just referred to urban planning procedures. The research has been\ud already successfully applied to some Italian districts in towns as Lodi, Genova and Milano. The set of\ud indicators was needed also to work within a multi disciplinary team that has already included\ud engineers, architects, planners as well as doctors and physicians. As a matter of fact the results in\ud terms of urban quality have been compared with medical results concerning health and wellness\ud perception (using SF-36 international recognized questionnaires) by users (inhabitants), finding (non\ud linear) relationships between urban quality and well being perception by inhabitants. The results of\ud this research can be used to: better define design strategies (by designers) accordingly to users\ud wellness, or evaluate ex-post the results of design activities (by municipalities or public authorities).
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • AA. VV., Living Places: Caring for quality, Londra, Ribabooks 2004.
    • AA.VV., Housing, space and quality of life, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2005.
    • AA.VV., Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design, Oxford, Architectural Press 2003 AA. VV., A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Studies and Papers, Nrda Inc., La Jolla 1994.
    • AA.VV. The quality of urban life: social, psychological, and physical conditions, Berlin, W. de Gruyter 1986.
    • AA. VV., Indicateurs d'environnement urbain, Paris, Ocde 1978.
    • Atkinson T., Public perceptions of the quality of life, Canada III, Perspectives 1980.
    • Bana E. Costa C. A. (a cura di), Readings in Multiple criteria Decision Aid, Berlin, SpringerVerlag, 1990.
    • Berry B.J.L., Land use, urban form and environmental quality, Chiacago, University of Chicago 1974.
    • Biddulph M. (Joseph Rowntree Foundation), Home Zones: A Planning and Design Handbook, York, The Policy Press 2001.
    • Bosselmann P., Representation of Places: Reality and Realism in City Design, Berkeley ; Los Angeles, London : University of California Press, c1998.
    • Canter L.W., Environmental Impact Assessment (2a ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill 1996.
    • Groat L. Wang D., Architectural research methods, New York, John Wiley & sons inc 2002.
    • Hanemann W.H., Theory Versus Data in the Contingent Valuation Debate, in Bjornstadt D.J. e Kahn J.R., The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources, Cheltenham, E. Elgar,1996.
    • Île-de-France. Commission de l'habitat et du cadre de vie, L'amélioration de la qualité de vie au quotidien et la gestion urbaine de proximité, Paris, CESR Île-de-France 2004.
    • Jacobs A. B., Mac Donald E., Rofe Y., The boulevard book: history, evolution, design of multiway boulevards, Cambridge, Mass; London : The MIT Press, 2002.
    • Joint Centre for Urban Design, Oxford Brookes University, Analysis of responses to the discussion document 'Quality in town and country', London, HMSO 1996.
    • Kahneman D. Knetscch J. L., Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction, in Jiournal of Environmental Economics and Management, n 30 1992.
    • Merleau-Ponty M., Fenomenologia della percezione, Milano, Bompiani 2003.
    • Osservatorio Città Sostenibili, C. Socco, M. Montrucchio, M.Bonandini, A. Cittadino, Indice di qualità ambientale dello spazio residenziale, Politecnico e Università di Torino, Dipartimento Interateneo Schneider M., The quality of life in Large American Cities: objective and subjective social indicators, in Social Indicator Research n.1, 1975, pp 495-509.
    • Socco C., Città, ambiente, paesaggio, Lineamenti di progettazione urbanistica, Utet, Torino 2000.
    • Tobelem-Zanin C., La qualité de la vie dans les villes françaises, Rouen, Publications de l'Université de Rouen 1995.
    • Terrien, S., Jugement de la qualité de vie urbaine, Nantes, Université de Nantes 2000.
    • Vismara R. Zavatti A., (cura di), Indicatori e scale di qualità, Pitagora editrice, Bologna 1996.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article