LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Raven, Joanna; van den Broek, Nynke; Tao, Fangbiao; Kun, Huang; Tolhurst, Rachel (2015)
Publisher: Springer Nature
Journal: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: wq_160, Research Article, China, wq_415, Childbirth, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, wa_395, User perspectives, Quality of care, wa_310, wq_175
Background In the context of improved utilisation of health care and outcomes, rapid socio-economic development and health system reform in China, it is timely to consider the quality of services. Data on quality of maternal health care as experienced by women is limited. This study explores women’s expectations and experiences of the quality of childbirth care in rural China. Methods Thirty five semi-structured interviews and five focus group discussions were conducted with 69 women who had delivered in the past 12 months in hospitals in a rural County in Anhui Province. Data were transcribed, translated and analysed using the framework approach. Results Hospital delivery was preferred because it was considered safe. Home delivery was uncommon and unsupported by the health system. Expectations such as having skilled providers and privacy during childbirth were met. However, most women reported lack of cleanliness, companionship during labour, pain relief, and opportunity to participate in decision making as poor aspects of care. Absence of pain relief is one reason why women may opt for a caesarean section. Conclusions These findings illustrate that to improve quality of care it is crucial to build accountability and communication between providers, women and their families. Ensuring women’s participation in decision making needs to be addressed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0545-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, AMDD. Monitoring emergency obstetric care a handbook. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009. Available: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241547734_eng.pdf.
    • 2. Adegoke AA, van den Broek N. Skilled birth attendance-lessons learnt. BJOG. 2009;116(S1):33-40.
    • 3. van den Broek NR, Graham WJ. Quality of care for maternal and newborn health: the neglected agenda. BJOG. 2009;116(7):18-21.
    • 4. Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9947):980-1004.
    • 5. WHO. Global Health Observatory. Accessed 1 April 2015. Available at: http:// www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/en/
    • 6. Feng XL, Zhu J, Zhang L, Song L, Hipgrave D, Guo S, et al. Socio-economic disparities in maternal mortality in China between 1996 and 2006. BJOG. 2010;117(12):1527-36.
    • 7. Yanqiu G, Ronsmans C, Lin A. Time trends and regional differences in maternal mortality in China from 2000 to 2005. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(12):913-20.
    • 8. Meng Q, Xu L, Zhang Y, Qian J, Cai M, Xin Y, et al. Trends in access to health services and financial protection in China between 2003 and 2011: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):805-14.
    • 9. Ministry of Health China, UNICEF, WHO, UNFPA. Joint review of maternal and child survival strategies in China. Beijing: Ministry of Health; 2006.
    • 10. Tao F, Huang K, Long X, Tolhurst R, Raven J. Low postnatal care rates in two rural counties in Anhui Province, China: perceptions of key stakeholders. Midwifery. 2011;27(5):707-15.
    • 11. Raven J, Tolhurst R, Tang S, van den Broek N. What is quality in maternal and neonatal health care? Midwifery. 2011;28(5):e676-83.
    • 12. Freedman LP. Using human rights in maternal mortality programs: from analysis to strategy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;75(1):51-60.
    • 13. Klemetti R, Che X, Gao Y, Raven J, Wu Z, Tang S, et al. Cesarean section delivery among primiparous women in rural China: an emerging epidemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(1):65.e1-6.
    • 14. Long Q, Zhang Y, Raven J, Wu Z, Bogg L, Tang S, et al. Giving birth at a health-care facility in rural China: is it affordable for the poor? Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(2):144-52.
    • 15. Harris A, Gao Y, Barclay L, Belton S, Yue ZW, Min H, et al. Consequences of birth policies and practices in post-reform China. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(30):114-24.
    • 16. Harris A, Belton S, Barclay L, Fenwick J. Midwives in China: jie sheng po to zhu chan shi. Midwifery. 2009;25(2):203-12.
    • 17. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743-8.
    • 18. Ritchie J, Spencer L, O'Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications; 2003. p. 219-62.
    • 19. MAXqda. MAXqda qualitative data analysis software. Marburg, Germany: Verbi Software; 2007.
    • 20. Karkee R, Lee AH, Binns CW. Bypassing birth centres for childbirth: an analysis of data from a community-based prospective cohort study in Nepal. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(1):1-7.
    • 21. Ith P, Dawson A, Homer CSE. Women's perspective of maternity care in Cambodia. Women Birth. 2013;26:71-5.
    • 22. Chaturvedi S, Randive B, Diwan V, De Costa A. Quality of obstetric referral services in India's JSY cash transfer programme for institutional births: a study from Madhya Pradesh province. Plos One. 2014;9(5):e96773.
    • 23. Xu Q, Smith H, Zhou L, Liang J, Garner P. Evidence-based obstetrics in four hospitals in China: an observational study to explore clinical practice, women's preferences and provider's views. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2001;1(1):1-7.
    • 24. Baker A, Ferguson SA, Roach GD, Dawson D. Perceptions of labour pain by mothers and their attending midwives. J Adv Nurs. 2001;35(2):171-9.
    • 25. Callister L. The pain of childbirth: perceptions of culturally diverse women. Pain Manag Nurs. 2003;4(4):145-54.
    • 26. Cheung NF, Mander R, Wang X, Fu W, Zhou H, Zhang L. Views of Chinese women and health professionals about midwife-led care in China. Midwifery. 2011;27(6):842-7.
    • 27. Gagnon AJ, Sandall J. Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3:CD002869.
    • 28. Stamler LL. The participants' views of childbirth education: is there congruency with an enablement framework for patient education? J Adv Nurs. 1998;28(5):939.
    • 29. Koehn M. Contemporary women's perceptions of childbirth education. J Perinat Educ. 2008;17(1):11-8.
    • 30. Lee LYK, Holroyd E. Evaluating the effect of childbirth education class: a mixed-method study. Int Nurs Rev. 2009;56(3):361-8.
    • 31. Enkin M, Keirse M, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett ED, et al. Guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
    • 32. Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003;3:CD003766.
    • 33. Sercekus P, Okumus H. Fears associated with childbirth among nulliparous women in Turkey. Midwifery. 2009;25(2):155-62.
    • 34. Fenwick J, Staff L, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Bayes S. Why do women request caesarean section in a normal, healthy first pregnancy? Midwifery. 2010;26(4):394-400.
    • 35. Kasai KE, Nomura RMY, Benute GRG, de Lucia MCS, Zugaib M. Women's opinions about mode of birth in Brazil: a qualitative study in a public teaching hospital. Midwifery. 2010;26(3):319-26.
    • 36. Shahoei R, Riji HM, Saeedi ZA. Safe passage: pregnant Iranian Kurdish womens choice of childbirth method. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(10):2130-8.
    • 37. Tolhurst R, Huang K, Long Q, Zhang T, Xiao S, Tang X, et al. Utilisation, contents and costs of prenatal care under a rural health insurance (New Co-operative Medical System) in rural China: lessons from implementation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):1-11.
    • 38. Gao Y, Barclay L. Availability and quality of emergency obstetric care in Shanxi Province, China. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010;110(2):181-5.
    • 39. Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):S160-72.
    • 40. Olsen DP, Honghong Wang DP, Pang S. Informed consent practices of Chinese nurse researchers. Nurs Ethics. 2010;17(2):179-87.
    • 41. Cong Y. Doctor-family-patient relationship: the Chinese paradigm of informed consent. J Med Philos. 2004;29(2):149.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article